The use of cell salvage in adult cardiac surgery at Queen Alia Heart Institute

Dya D. Alsmadi, Abdallah Alhadidi, Ahmad Alawamleh, Suhaib Alghawanmeh, Wael Alshobaki, A. F. Mohd
{"title":"The use of cell salvage in adult cardiac surgery at Queen Alia Heart Institute","authors":"Dya D. Alsmadi, Abdallah Alhadidi, Ahmad Alawamleh, Suhaib Alghawanmeh, Wael Alshobaki, A. F. Mohd","doi":"10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20240015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Objective of the study was to determine the incidence of use cell salvage, indications, efficacy in blood conservation and benefits on recovery after adult cardiac surgery.\nMethods: This is an observational analysis of adult cardiac surgical patients presenting for cardiac surgery at Queen Alia Heart Institute in the period between September 2023 and December 2023. Patients’ demographics, type of surgery (cardiac pathology), comorbidities, preoperative and postoperative laboratory results, blood transfusion requirements, extubation and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay were recorded and statistically analysed to determine the effectiveness of cell salvage. Patients were divided into two groups: The cell saver group and the no cell saver group for comparison.\nResults: Data from 141 adult cardiac surgeries is included in this analysis. Indications for cell saver use were recent anticoagulation (41.4%), more complex surgery (20.7%), high risk of bleeding (13.8%), preoperative anaemia (6.9%), intraoperative major bleeding (6.9%), coagulopathy (6.9%) and rare patient blood type (3.45%). Patients from the cell saver group required blood transfusion 2.1% more than the no cell saver group. There was no significant difference in the length of hospitalization between those who had and those who had not cell saver used during surgery (11.9 and 12 days, respectively).\nConclusions: Cell saver was used in one fifth of adult cardiac surgeries. Most common indications for cell saver use during cardiac surgery were recent anticoagulation and more complicated cardiac surgery. The use of cell saver had no impact on postoperative haematocrit or overall time of hospitalization.\n ","PeriodicalId":13827,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advances in Medicine","volume":" 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advances in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20240015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Objective of the study was to determine the incidence of use cell salvage, indications, efficacy in blood conservation and benefits on recovery after adult cardiac surgery. Methods: This is an observational analysis of adult cardiac surgical patients presenting for cardiac surgery at Queen Alia Heart Institute in the period between September 2023 and December 2023. Patients’ demographics, type of surgery (cardiac pathology), comorbidities, preoperative and postoperative laboratory results, blood transfusion requirements, extubation and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay were recorded and statistically analysed to determine the effectiveness of cell salvage. Patients were divided into two groups: The cell saver group and the no cell saver group for comparison. Results: Data from 141 adult cardiac surgeries is included in this analysis. Indications for cell saver use were recent anticoagulation (41.4%), more complex surgery (20.7%), high risk of bleeding (13.8%), preoperative anaemia (6.9%), intraoperative major bleeding (6.9%), coagulopathy (6.9%) and rare patient blood type (3.45%). Patients from the cell saver group required blood transfusion 2.1% more than the no cell saver group. There was no significant difference in the length of hospitalization between those who had and those who had not cell saver used during surgery (11.9 and 12 days, respectively). Conclusions: Cell saver was used in one fifth of adult cardiac surgeries. Most common indications for cell saver use during cardiac surgery were recent anticoagulation and more complicated cardiac surgery. The use of cell saver had no impact on postoperative haematocrit or overall time of hospitalization.  
阿丽雅王后心脏研究所在成人心脏手术中使用细胞挽救术
研究背景本研究的目的是确定成人心脏手术后使用细胞抢救的发生率、适应症、血液保存的有效性以及对恢复的益处:本研究对 2023 年 9 月至 2023 年 12 月期间在阿丽雅王后心脏研究所接受心脏手术的成人心脏外科患者进行观察分析。记录并统计分析了患者的人口统计学特征、手术类型(心脏病理)、合并症、术前和术后实验室结果、输血需求、拔管和重症监护室(ICU)住院时间,以确定细胞挽救的效果。患者被分为两组:结果:本分析包括 141 例成人心脏手术的数据。使用细胞保存剂的指征包括近期抗凝(41.4%)、更复杂的手术(20.7%)、高出血风险(13.8%)、术前贫血(6.9%)、术中大出血(6.9%)、凝血功能障碍(6.9%)和罕见血型(3.45%)。细胞保存者组患者需要输血的比例比无细胞保存者组高 2.1%。手术期间使用和未使用细胞保存剂的患者的住院时间没有明显差异(分别为11.9天和12天):结论:五分之一的成人心脏手术使用了细胞保存液。结论:五分之一的成人心脏手术中使用了细胞保存液。心脏手术中使用细胞保存液的最常见适应症是近期抗凝和较复杂的心脏手术。使用细胞保存液对术后血细胞比容或总体住院时间没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信