Biopsy or no biopsy? Risk of Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules Based on TI-RADS Criteria

Faadil Shariff, Vivek Halappa
{"title":"Biopsy or no biopsy? Risk of Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules Based on TI-RADS Criteria","authors":"Faadil Shariff, Vivek Halappa","doi":"10.18060/27782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules recommended for biopsy using the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting & Data System (TIRADS). \nMethods: We conducted a retrospective review of ultrasound (US) guided thyroid biopsies performed from 2018- 2023 at IU Health hospitals for nodules which were recommended for biopsy based on ACR TI-RADS criteria and compared with histopathology results. The research was conducted at University and Methodist Hospital radiology reading rooms. \nResults: Of the total 210 thyroid nodules recommended for biopsy, only 8.57% of nodules biopsied were malignant. Positive malignancy rate for TR-3 was 10.2%, TR-4 was 7.1%, and TR-5 was 12.5%. TR-3 nodules less than 2.9 cm were all benign on histopathology. TR-4 nodules less than 1.5 cm were all benign on histopathology. TR-5 nodules were all benign on histopathology. The most common malignancy was papillary thyroid carcinoma. \nConclusion: ACR TI-RADS is currently the standard of care for guidelines and lexicon for radiologists for characterizing thyroid nodules. Our results demonstrate that all TR-3 nodules less than 2.9 cm were all benign and most of the TR-4 and TR-5 nodules biopsied were benign on histopathology. The lower biopsy rate for positive malignancy even for TR-4 and TR-5 nodules respectively raises the need for revision for existing TI-RADS criteria, as more nodules could be followed up with ultrasound rather than percutaneous biopsy, which will alleviate patient anxiety as well as decrease overall healthcare costs.","PeriodicalId":20522,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IMPRS","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IMPRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/27782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules recommended for biopsy using the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting & Data System (TIRADS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of ultrasound (US) guided thyroid biopsies performed from 2018- 2023 at IU Health hospitals for nodules which were recommended for biopsy based on ACR TI-RADS criteria and compared with histopathology results. The research was conducted at University and Methodist Hospital radiology reading rooms. Results: Of the total 210 thyroid nodules recommended for biopsy, only 8.57% of nodules biopsied were malignant. Positive malignancy rate for TR-3 was 10.2%, TR-4 was 7.1%, and TR-5 was 12.5%. TR-3 nodules less than 2.9 cm were all benign on histopathology. TR-4 nodules less than 1.5 cm were all benign on histopathology. TR-5 nodules were all benign on histopathology. The most common malignancy was papillary thyroid carcinoma. Conclusion: ACR TI-RADS is currently the standard of care for guidelines and lexicon for radiologists for characterizing thyroid nodules. Our results demonstrate that all TR-3 nodules less than 2.9 cm were all benign and most of the TR-4 and TR-5 nodules biopsied were benign on histopathology. The lower biopsy rate for positive malignancy even for TR-4 and TR-5 nodules respectively raises the need for revision for existing TI-RADS criteria, as more nodules could be followed up with ultrasound rather than percutaneous biopsy, which will alleviate patient anxiety as well as decrease overall healthcare costs.
活检还是不活检?基于 TI-RADS 标准的甲状腺结节恶性风险
目的:使用美国放射学会(ACR)甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)评估建议进行活检的甲状腺结节的恶性风险。方法:我们对2018-2023年期间IU Health医院根据ACR TI-RADS标准推荐进行活检的结节进行了超声(US)引导下甲状腺活检的回顾性研究,并与组织病理学结果进行了比较。研究在大学医院和卫理公会医院放射科阅片室进行。研究结果在建议活检的 210 个甲状腺结节中,只有 8.57% 的结节为恶性。TR-3的阳性恶性率为10.2%,TR-4为7.1%,TR-5为12.5%。组织病理学结果显示,小于 2.9 厘米的 TR-3 结节均为良性。小于 1.5 厘米的 TR-4 结节经组织病理学检查均为良性。TR-5结节的组织病理学检查结果均为良性。最常见的恶性肿瘤是甲状腺乳头状癌。结论ACR TI-RADS 是目前放射科医生描述甲状腺结节特征的标准指南和词典。我们的研究结果表明,所有小于 2.9 厘米的 TR-3 结节都是良性的,大多数活检的 TR-4 和 TR-5 结节在组织病理学上都是良性的。即使是TR-4和TR-5结节的活检阳性恶性率也较低,这就提出了修订现有TI-RADS标准的必要性,因为更多的结节可以通过超声而不是经皮活检进行随访,这将减轻患者的焦虑并降低总体医疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信