Pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap pelaku main hakim sendiri (Eigenrichting) putusan nomor: 194/Pid.B/2022/PN Unaha

Laras Sakti, Yeni Haerani, Yahyanto Yahyanto, Ade Caesar Premadani Adam
{"title":"Pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap pelaku main hakim sendiri (Eigenrichting) putusan nomor: 194/Pid.B/2022/PN Unaha","authors":"Laras Sakti, Yeni Haerani, Yahyanto Yahyanto, Ade Caesar Premadani Adam","doi":"10.47200/aoej.v15i1.2200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vigilantism (eigenrichting) is the act of punishing another person without going through the applicable legal process. This action can be categorised as a criminal offence, because it is contrary to the provisions of Article 1 of the Criminal Code which states that every person is prohibited from committing acts prohibited by law. The purpose of this study is to determine the concept of the criminal offence of vigilantism (eigenrichting) according to positive criminal law in Indonesia as well as to know and understand the form of criminal liability for the perpetrators of vigilantism (eigenrichting). This research uses normative-empirical legal research methods. The results showed that the concept of vigilantism (eigenrichting) according to positive criminal law in Indonesia that has been applied by the Public Prosecutor at the Konawe District Prosecutor's Office is Article 170 of the Criminal Code on Robbery, Article 338 of the Criminal Code on Murder, and Article 351 of the Criminal Code on Maltreatment. Criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of vigilantism (eigenrichting) in Decision Number: 194/Pid.B/2022/PN, the perpetrators are responsible for their actions based on their position and the form of their actions. The Panel of Judges applied Article 55 Paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code which regulates the position of the perpetrator in the participation of a criminal offence declared as a pleger (perpetrator) by the Panel of Judges of the Unaha District Court.","PeriodicalId":281807,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Education Journal","volume":" 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v15i1.2200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vigilantism (eigenrichting) is the act of punishing another person without going through the applicable legal process. This action can be categorised as a criminal offence, because it is contrary to the provisions of Article 1 of the Criminal Code which states that every person is prohibited from committing acts prohibited by law. The purpose of this study is to determine the concept of the criminal offence of vigilantism (eigenrichting) according to positive criminal law in Indonesia as well as to know and understand the form of criminal liability for the perpetrators of vigilantism (eigenrichting). This research uses normative-empirical legal research methods. The results showed that the concept of vigilantism (eigenrichting) according to positive criminal law in Indonesia that has been applied by the Public Prosecutor at the Konawe District Prosecutor's Office is Article 170 of the Criminal Code on Robbery, Article 338 of the Criminal Code on Murder, and Article 351 of the Criminal Code on Maltreatment. Criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of vigilantism (eigenrichting) in Decision Number: 194/Pid.B/2022/PN, the perpetrators are responsible for their actions based on their position and the form of their actions. The Panel of Judges applied Article 55 Paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code which regulates the position of the perpetrator in the participation of a criminal offence declared as a pleger (perpetrator) by the Panel of Judges of the Unaha District Court.
私刑实施者的刑事责任(Eigenrichting) 判决书编号:194/Pid.B/2022/PN Unaha
警戒主义(eigenrichting)是指不通过适用的法律程序而惩罚他人的行为。这种行为可归类为刑事犯罪,因为它违反了《刑法典》第 1 条的规定,即禁止任何人实施法律禁止的行为。本研究的目的是根据印度尼西亚的实在刑法确定私刑(eigenrichting)刑事犯罪的概念,并了解和理解私刑(eigenrichting)实施者的刑事责任形式。本研究采用规范-实证法律研究方法。结果表明,根据印度尼西亚实在刑法,科纳威地区检察院检察官适用的私刑(eigenrichting)概念是《刑法典》第170条 "抢劫"、第338条 "谋杀 "和第351条 "虐待"。在第 194/Pid.B/2022/PN 号裁决中,私刑(eigenrichting)实施者的刑事责任,实施者应根据其地位和行为形式对其行为负责。法官小组适用了《刑法典》第 55 条第(1)款至第(1)款,其中规定了乌纳哈地区法院法官小组宣布的刑事犯罪 行为人(行为人)在参与刑事犯罪中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信