{"title":"Digital banking ecosystems: Comparative analysis and competition regulation in Russia","authors":"Svetlana Galazova","doi":"10.29141/2658-5081-2023-24-4-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital ecosystems allow banks to expand their offerings of financial and non-financial services, and thereby raise the quality and speed of customer service. Yet the broader range of banks’ non-financial services increases the size of their non-core assets and affects their financial stability. This creates certain complexities to ecosystems’ management both at the level of a bank and at the level of financial market regulation. The study covers theoretical and practical aspects of setting up and developing ecosystems in the Russian banking industry. The theory of industrial organisation and the ecosystem concept constitute the methodological basis of the research. The study adopts comparative and structural analysis methods. The evidence comes from public and internal reporting of PAO Sberbank, AO Tinkoff Bank, VTB Bank (PAO). The research found that banking ecosystems differ in the key area of activities (for instance, the Tinkoff Bank’s ecosystem focuses on investment and education, whereas VTB Bank’s one concentrates on a housing programme), nature of interaction between their participants, and the method of creation (universal, niche, outsourcing, insourcing). The development specifics of digital banking ecosystems depend on their specialisation, structure of immobilised assets, customer base, and level of business processes’ digitalisation. The value of the research comes from the revealed structural and functional peculiarities of digital ecosystems in the banking industry, as well as in the proved necessity to further refine the methods for accounting and assessing immobilised assets of banks.","PeriodicalId":33954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Economy","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2023-24-4-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Digital ecosystems allow banks to expand their offerings of financial and non-financial services, and thereby raise the quality and speed of customer service. Yet the broader range of banks’ non-financial services increases the size of their non-core assets and affects their financial stability. This creates certain complexities to ecosystems’ management both at the level of a bank and at the level of financial market regulation. The study covers theoretical and practical aspects of setting up and developing ecosystems in the Russian banking industry. The theory of industrial organisation and the ecosystem concept constitute the methodological basis of the research. The study adopts comparative and structural analysis methods. The evidence comes from public and internal reporting of PAO Sberbank, AO Tinkoff Bank, VTB Bank (PAO). The research found that banking ecosystems differ in the key area of activities (for instance, the Tinkoff Bank’s ecosystem focuses on investment and education, whereas VTB Bank’s one concentrates on a housing programme), nature of interaction between their participants, and the method of creation (universal, niche, outsourcing, insourcing). The development specifics of digital banking ecosystems depend on their specialisation, structure of immobilised assets, customer base, and level of business processes’ digitalisation. The value of the research comes from the revealed structural and functional peculiarities of digital ecosystems in the banking industry, as well as in the proved necessity to further refine the methods for accounting and assessing immobilised assets of banks.
数字生态系统使银行能够扩大金融和非金融服务,从而提高客户服务的质量和速度。然而,银行非金融服务范围的扩大会增加其非核心资产的规模,并影响其财务稳定性。这在银行层面和金融市场监管层面都给生态系统的管理带来了一定的复杂性。本研究涵盖了在俄罗斯银行业建立和发展生态系统的理论和实践方面。产业组织理论和生态系统概念构成了研究的方法论基础。研究采用了比较分析和结构分析方法。证据来自 PAO Sberbank、AO Tinkoff Bank 和 VTB Bank (PAO) 的公开和内部报告。研究发现,银行生态系统在主要活动领域(例如,Tinkoff 银行的生态系统侧重于投资和教育,而 VTB 银行的生态系统侧重于住房计划)、参与者之间的互动性质以及创建方法(通用、利基、外包、内包)方面存在差异。数字银行生态系统的发展特点取决于其专业化程度、固定资产结构、客户群和业务流程的数字化水平。研究的价值在于揭示了银行业数字生态系统在结构和功能上的特殊性,以及进一步完善银行固定资产核算和评估方法的必要性。