Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Normal Tension Glaucoma Diagnosis: The Role of Macular Thickness Asymmetry

Ahmed El Sayed, Mona Mansour
{"title":"Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Normal Tension Glaucoma Diagnosis: The Role of Macular Thickness Asymmetry","authors":"Ahmed El Sayed, Mona Mansour","doi":"10.21608/ijma.2023.233510.1797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article information Background: According to reports, the macula provides a number of potential physiological and anatomical benefits for glaucoma detection and management. The Aim of the work: This study aims to determine if spectral domain optical coherence tomography [SD-OCT] measures of macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL] thickness can reliably differentiate between primary open-angle glaucoma [POAG] and normal-tension glaucoma [NTG]. Patients and Methods: A prospective study enrolled 10 healthy participants, 29 glaucomatous patients: 13 with POAG and 16 with NTG. Diagnosis based on intraocular pressures, visual fields, and optic nerves. The following parameters were measured by SD-OCT B-scans: RNFL thickness [circumpapillary scan] and macular thickness [posterior pole asymmetry scan] in both eyes and then recorded in addition to the calculated inter-eye and intra-eye differences [asymmetry parameters]. Receiver operator characteristic [ROC] analysis was used to determine the optimum cut off value for the studied diagnostic markers [RNFL and macular thickness]. Results: Inferior macular thickness asymmetry [intereye] had the highest discrimination for normal-POAG [AUC=0.838, sensitivity = 61.5% at 80% specificity], followed by inferior RNFL thickness [intereye] asymmetry [AUC=0.808, sensitivity = 61.5% at 80% specificity]. For normal-NTG total macular thickness asymmetry [intereye] had the highest discrimination [AUC=0.756, sensitivity = 68.8 % at 80% specificity], followed by inferior RNFL thickness [intereye] asymmetry [AUC=0.700, sensitivity = 62.5 % at 80% specificity]. Conclusion: For the discriminating of NTG and POAG, the macular parameters function is comparable to the RNFL parameters. The top SD-OCT metrics with the best discriminating skills were intereye Inferior macular thickness asymmetry, the total retinal nerve fibre layer thickness, the intereye inferior retinal nerve fibre thickness, and the inferior macular thickness","PeriodicalId":53130,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Arts","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijma.2023.233510.1797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article information Background: According to reports, the macula provides a number of potential physiological and anatomical benefits for glaucoma detection and management. The Aim of the work: This study aims to determine if spectral domain optical coherence tomography [SD-OCT] measures of macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL] thickness can reliably differentiate between primary open-angle glaucoma [POAG] and normal-tension glaucoma [NTG]. Patients and Methods: A prospective study enrolled 10 healthy participants, 29 glaucomatous patients: 13 with POAG and 16 with NTG. Diagnosis based on intraocular pressures, visual fields, and optic nerves. The following parameters were measured by SD-OCT B-scans: RNFL thickness [circumpapillary scan] and macular thickness [posterior pole asymmetry scan] in both eyes and then recorded in addition to the calculated inter-eye and intra-eye differences [asymmetry parameters]. Receiver operator characteristic [ROC] analysis was used to determine the optimum cut off value for the studied diagnostic markers [RNFL and macular thickness]. Results: Inferior macular thickness asymmetry [intereye] had the highest discrimination for normal-POAG [AUC=0.838, sensitivity = 61.5% at 80% specificity], followed by inferior RNFL thickness [intereye] asymmetry [AUC=0.808, sensitivity = 61.5% at 80% specificity]. For normal-NTG total macular thickness asymmetry [intereye] had the highest discrimination [AUC=0.756, sensitivity = 68.8 % at 80% specificity], followed by inferior RNFL thickness [intereye] asymmetry [AUC=0.700, sensitivity = 62.5 % at 80% specificity]. Conclusion: For the discriminating of NTG and POAG, the macular parameters function is comparable to the RNFL parameters. The top SD-OCT metrics with the best discriminating skills were intereye Inferior macular thickness asymmetry, the total retinal nerve fibre layer thickness, the intereye inferior retinal nerve fibre thickness, and the inferior macular thickness
原发性开角型青光眼和正常张力型青光眼的诊断:黄斑厚度不对称的作用
文章信息 背景:据报道,黄斑为青光眼的检测和管理提供了许多潜在的生理和解剖益处。工作目的:本研究旨在确定光谱域光学相干断层扫描[SD-OCT]测量黄斑和毛细血管周围视网膜神经纤维层[RNFL]厚度是否能可靠地区分原发性开角型青光眼[POAG]和正常张力青光眼[NTG]。患者和方法:一项前瞻性研究招募了 10 名健康参与者、29 名青光眼患者:其中 13 人患有 POAG,16 人患有 NTG。诊断依据眼压、视野和视神经。通过 SD-OCT B 扫描测量以下参数:双眼的 RNFL 厚度[环毛细血管扫描]和黄斑厚度[后极不对称扫描],然后记录计算出的眼间差和眼内差[不对称参数]。采用接收操作者特征[ROC]分析确定所研究的诊断指标[RNFL和黄斑厚度]的最佳截断值。结果如下下黄斑厚度[眼内]不对称对正常-POAG的辨别率最高[AUC=0.838,特异性为80%时灵敏度=61.5%],其次是下RNFL厚度[眼内]不对称[AUC=0.808,特异性为80%时灵敏度=61.5%]。对于正常-NTG,黄斑总厚度[眼内]不对称的辨别率最高[AUC=0.756,特异性为 80% 时灵敏度=68.8%],其次是下部 RNFL 厚度[眼内]不对称[AUC=0.700,特异性为 80% 时灵敏度=62.5%]。结论在区分 NTG 和 POAG 时,黄斑参数的功能与 RNFL 参数相当。辨别能力最强的 SD-OCT 指标是眼内黄斑下厚度不对称、视网膜神经纤维层总厚度、眼内黄斑下视网膜神经纤维厚度和黄斑下厚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信