Decolonizing the Politics of Love: A Ghazālian Genealogy of Love in Islam

IF 0.3 N/A RELIGION
Ebrahim Moosa
{"title":"Decolonizing the Politics of Love: A Ghazālian Genealogy of Love in Islam","authors":"Ebrahim Moosa","doi":"10.1080/1462317x.2024.2304442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article invites a consideration of more diverse conceptions of love. It proposes as a contribution specific Islamic forms of love, especially those theorized by the medieval Muslim theologian, Abū H.āmid al-Ghazālī (d. 1111). The goal is to decolonize the concept of love from dominant Christocentric notions of agape and redemptive forms of love that shape interfaith dialogue. It argues why we need to explore and take account of different conceptions of love. Pope Benedict scandalized the Muslim world with his 2006 Regensberg lecture. The source for many of these misunderstandings is the equation of the ontotheology of love in a particular strand of Christianity with love in Islam. Historically, Islam’s ontotheology is centered around incumbent mercy, whereas love is a product within a theological apparatus of experiential relationships of humans with each other as well as with the divine. The article elaborates why Ghazālī’s phenomenology of love enriches our understanding of love. Foregrounding knowledge, perception, and obedience, Ghazālī offers a complex experiential conception of love within a Muslim theological ‘apparatus’ and matrix. Proposing that Christianity and Islam have love in common, as some have proposed, does not do justice to the rich, but very different conceptions of love in each tradition.","PeriodicalId":43759,"journal":{"name":"Political Theology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317x.2024.2304442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article invites a consideration of more diverse conceptions of love. It proposes as a contribution specific Islamic forms of love, especially those theorized by the medieval Muslim theologian, Abū H.āmid al-Ghazālī (d. 1111). The goal is to decolonize the concept of love from dominant Christocentric notions of agape and redemptive forms of love that shape interfaith dialogue. It argues why we need to explore and take account of different conceptions of love. Pope Benedict scandalized the Muslim world with his 2006 Regensberg lecture. The source for many of these misunderstandings is the equation of the ontotheology of love in a particular strand of Christianity with love in Islam. Historically, Islam’s ontotheology is centered around incumbent mercy, whereas love is a product within a theological apparatus of experiential relationships of humans with each other as well as with the divine. The article elaborates why Ghazālī’s phenomenology of love enriches our understanding of love. Foregrounding knowledge, perception, and obedience, Ghazālī offers a complex experiential conception of love within a Muslim theological ‘apparatus’ and matrix. Proposing that Christianity and Islam have love in common, as some have proposed, does not do justice to the rich, but very different conceptions of love in each tradition.
爱情政治的非殖民化:伊斯兰爱的加扎利谱系
这篇文章邀请人们思考更加多样化的爱情观。它提出了具体的伊斯兰爱的形式,特别是中世纪穆斯林神学家阿布-哈米德-加扎利(Abū H.āmid al-Ghazālī,卒于 1111 年)理论化的爱的形式。该书的目的是将爱的概念从主导宗教间对话的以基督为中心的 "爱的救赎"(agape)和 "救赎"(redemptive)形式的爱的概念中解放出来。它论证了为什么我们需要探索和考虑不同的爱的概念。教皇本笃在 2006 年的雷根斯堡演讲中丑化了穆斯林世界。许多误解的根源在于将基督教中的爱本体论等同于伊斯兰教中的爱。从历史上看,伊斯兰教的本体论是以义不容辞的仁慈为中心的,而爱则是人与人之间以及人与神之间经验关系的神学装置中的产物。文章阐述了为什么加扎利的爱的现象学丰富了我们对爱的理解。加扎利将知识、感知和服从放在首位,在穆斯林神学 "装置 "和矩阵中提供了一种复杂的爱的体验概念。有些人认为基督教和伊斯兰教对爱的理解是相同的,但这并不符合两种传统对爱的丰富而又迥异的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Political Theology
Political Theology RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信