Initiation Rate of First-hour Breastfeeding in Healthy Term and Near Term Babies: Outcome Assessment After Quality Improvement Methods in Secondary Care District Hospital

Q4 Medicine
D. S. Gedam, Rajanya Prajapati, Mamta Verma
{"title":"Initiation Rate of First-hour Breastfeeding in Healthy Term and Near Term Babies: Outcome Assessment After Quality Improvement Methods in Secondary Care District Hospital","authors":"D. S. Gedam, Rajanya Prajapati, Mamta Verma","doi":"10.1177/09732179231220200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To improve the rate of first-hour breastfeeding in term and near-term healthy neonates by a quality improvement (QI) study at Secondary Care District Hospital. Design: QI study. Setting: Labor room-operation theatre of a secondary care district hospital. Participants: Stable newborns ≥35 weeks of gestation born by normal vaginal delivery and by cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Procedure: A team of nurses, pediatricians, obstetricians, and anesthetists analyzed possible reasons for delayed initiation of breastfeeding by flow chart and Fishbone analysis. Various change ideas were tested through sequential Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Outcome measure: Proportion of eligible babies breastfed within 1 hour of delivery. Results: The rate of first-hour initiation of breastfeeding increased from 69% to 88% in normal vaginal deliveries and from 17% to 61% in the cesarian section over the study period, which were sustained up to 80% in normal vaginal deliveries (NVD) and 55% in lower segment cesarean section. Conclusions: A QI approach was able to accomplish sustained improvement in first-hour breastfeeding rates in normal and cesarean deliveries.","PeriodicalId":16516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatology","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179231220200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To improve the rate of first-hour breastfeeding in term and near-term healthy neonates by a quality improvement (QI) study at Secondary Care District Hospital. Design: QI study. Setting: Labor room-operation theatre of a secondary care district hospital. Participants: Stable newborns ≥35 weeks of gestation born by normal vaginal delivery and by cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Procedure: A team of nurses, pediatricians, obstetricians, and anesthetists analyzed possible reasons for delayed initiation of breastfeeding by flow chart and Fishbone analysis. Various change ideas were tested through sequential Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Outcome measure: Proportion of eligible babies breastfed within 1 hour of delivery. Results: The rate of first-hour initiation of breastfeeding increased from 69% to 88% in normal vaginal deliveries and from 17% to 61% in the cesarian section over the study period, which were sustained up to 80% in normal vaginal deliveries (NVD) and 55% in lower segment cesarean section. Conclusions: A QI approach was able to accomplish sustained improvement in first-hour breastfeeding rates in normal and cesarean deliveries.
健康足月和临近足月婴儿第一小时母乳喂养的开始率:二级护理地区医院采用质量改进方法后的结果评估
目的通过在二级护理区医院开展质量改进(QI)研究,提高足月和近足月健康新生儿的首小时母乳喂养率。设计:QI 研究。地点一家二级护理地区医院的产房-手术室。参与者:妊娠≥35 周的稳定新生儿,经阴道顺产或在脊髓麻醉下剖宫产。手术过程:由护士、儿科医生、产科医生和麻醉师组成的团队通过流程图和鱼骨分析法分析了母乳喂养延迟的可能原因。通过有序的 "计划-实施-研究-行动 "周期,对各种变革想法进行了测试。结果测量:符合条件的婴儿在分娩后 1 小时内接受母乳喂养的比例。结果在研究期间,正常阴道分娩和剖宫产婴儿的第一小时母乳喂养率分别从 69% 和 17% 提高到 88%和 61%,正常阴道分娩和剖宫产婴儿的第一小时母乳喂养率分别保持在 80% 和 55%。结论:质量改进方法能够持续提高顺产和剖宫产产妇的第一小时母乳喂养率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neonatology
Journal of Neonatology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信