DETERMINATION OF THE RISK OF OBTAINING UNSATISFACTORY RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH STATIC DEFORMITIES OF THE FOREFOOT WHEN USING VARIOUS SURGICAL APPROACHES

D. Prozorovskiy
{"title":"DETERMINATION OF THE RISK OF OBTAINING UNSATISFACTORY RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH STATIC DEFORMITIES OF THE FOREFOOT WHEN USING VARIOUS SURGICAL APPROACHES","authors":"D. Prozorovskiy","doi":"10.15674/0030-59872023463-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main method of treatment of static deformations of the forefoot (SDPVS) is surgical. The most static deformities of the foot in its front part most often include valgus deformity of the first toe — Hallux valgus (HV), hammer-like deformities of 2–4 toes, and Taylor's deformity. Objective. To assess the effectiveness of surgical treatment of SDPVS and to determine the risk of obtaining an unsatisfactory result with different surgical approaches. Methods. The treatment of 565 patients (1009 feet) was analyzed, the main group — 729 feet, control 280 feet. The groups of patients differed in the methods of surgical treatment of deformities of the forefoot. The choice of surgical intervention in the main group was carried out according to the algorithmized system of surgical treatment of patients with SDPVS. Results. The results of treatment of patients with static deformities of the front part of the foot in the main group were significantly (p < 0.001) better than the results in the control group of patients. In the main group, good results accounted for 55.0 % of cases, satisfied — 39.2 %, unsatisfactory — 5.8 %, compared to the control group — 26.1 %, 43.2 and 30.7 %, respectively. The reduction of the relative risk of obtaining an unsatisfied result (RRR) in the main group when using the proposed algorithmized system of treatment of SDPVS is 68 %. In the treatment of combined VDPPS with deformities of 2–5 toes, the risk of an unsatisfactory result is higher compared to isolated VDPPS in both groups. The risk of an unsatisfactory treatment result in patients with combined HV deformity and deformities of 2–5 toes in the control group is 15.9 % higher (RR = 0.159 ± 0.174) than in the main group. The use of the proposed approach to the selection of surgical treatment tactics based on the developed algorithmized system of surgical treatment of SDPVS can reduce the relative risk of obtaining unsatisfactory treatment results by 84 % (RRR = 0.841).","PeriodicalId":137495,"journal":{"name":"ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872023463-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main method of treatment of static deformations of the forefoot (SDPVS) is surgical. The most static deformities of the foot in its front part most often include valgus deformity of the first toe — Hallux valgus (HV), hammer-like deformities of 2–4 toes, and Taylor's deformity. Objective. To assess the effectiveness of surgical treatment of SDPVS and to determine the risk of obtaining an unsatisfactory result with different surgical approaches. Methods. The treatment of 565 patients (1009 feet) was analyzed, the main group — 729 feet, control 280 feet. The groups of patients differed in the methods of surgical treatment of deformities of the forefoot. The choice of surgical intervention in the main group was carried out according to the algorithmized system of surgical treatment of patients with SDPVS. Results. The results of treatment of patients with static deformities of the front part of the foot in the main group were significantly (p < 0.001) better than the results in the control group of patients. In the main group, good results accounted for 55.0 % of cases, satisfied — 39.2 %, unsatisfactory — 5.8 %, compared to the control group — 26.1 %, 43.2 and 30.7 %, respectively. The reduction of the relative risk of obtaining an unsatisfied result (RRR) in the main group when using the proposed algorithmized system of treatment of SDPVS is 68 %. In the treatment of combined VDPPS with deformities of 2–5 toes, the risk of an unsatisfactory result is higher compared to isolated VDPPS in both groups. The risk of an unsatisfactory treatment result in patients with combined HV deformity and deformities of 2–5 toes in the control group is 15.9 % higher (RR = 0.159 ± 0.174) than in the main group. The use of the proposed approach to the selection of surgical treatment tactics based on the developed algorithmized system of surgical treatment of SDPVS can reduce the relative risk of obtaining unsatisfactory treatment results by 84 % (RRR = 0.841).
确定采用各种手术方法对前足静态畸形患者进行手术治疗获得不满意效果的风险
治疗前足静态畸形(SDPVS)的主要方法是手术。足前部最常见的静态畸形包括第一趾外翻畸形(HV)、2-4趾锤状畸形和泰勒畸形。目的评估手术治疗 SDPVS 的有效性,并确定采用不同手术方法获得不满意结果的风险。方法。对 565 名患者(1009 英尺)的治疗情况进行了分析,主要组为 729 英尺,对照组为 280 英尺。两组患者前足畸形的手术治疗方法不同。主组患者的手术治疗选择是根据 SDPVS 患者手术治疗的算法系统进行的。结果主治疗组患者足前部静态畸形的治疗效果明显优于对照组患者(P < 0.001)。与对照组的 26.1%、43.2% 和 30.7%相比,主要治疗组中疗效好的占 55.0%,满意的占 39.2%,不满意的占 5.8%。使用拟议的算法系统治疗 SDPVS 时,主要治疗组获得不满意结果的相对风险(RRR)降低了 68%。在治疗合并 2-5 个脚趾畸形的 VDPPS 时,两组患者获得不满意结果的风险均高于孤立 VDPPS。在对照组中,合并 HV 畸形和 2-5 趾畸形的患者治疗效果不满意的风险(RR = 0.159 ± 0.174)比主要组高 15.9%。根据已开发的 SDPVS 手术治疗算法系统,采用建议的方法选择手术治疗策略,可将获得不满意治疗结果的相对风险降低 84 %(RRR = 0.841)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信