QUANTIFYING THE IMPACT OF RISK FACTORS ON DIRECT COMPENSATION PROPERTY DAMAGE IN CANADIAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE

Pervin Baylan, Neslihan Demi̇rel
{"title":"QUANTIFYING THE IMPACT OF RISK FACTORS ON DIRECT COMPENSATION PROPERTY DAMAGE IN CANADIAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE","authors":"Pervin Baylan, Neslihan Demi̇rel","doi":"10.51541/nicel.1397941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a statistical analysis assessing the impact of various risk factors on direct compensation property damage (DCPD) claims in private passenger vehicle accidents. Using automobile insurance data in Ontario, Canada for the decade years period between 2003 and 2012, a statistical model of property damage was explored via a generalized linear binary logit mixed model and considered the imbalance between the classes of insureds. The results indicate that several risk factors have a significant impact on the likelihood of DCPD claims, including usage, training, outstanding losses, and incurred losses. The effects of these risk factors were observed under the weights — the number of trials used to generate each success proportion — in the different classes of insureds. The generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) analysis provides a powerful tool for quantifying the impact of risk factors on binary outcomes, which are called DCPD claims and property damage (PD) claims covered by third-party liability (TPL) insurance. These models can also inform insurance underwriting and policy design, focusing on identifying the most significant risk factors. The performance metrics calculated by considering the class imbalance in binary outcomes verify the proposed model’s ability to accurately predict classes. The F1 score, an evaluation metric to measure the performance of classification, was calculated as 0.934. In addition, the PR AUC score, which is the area under the Precision-Recall (PR) curve, was computed as 0.953. These high scores indicate that the proposed model performs well in the classification. The other metrics also support the classification accuracy of the proposed model. The findings of the analysis can help insurers better understand the underlying drivers of property damages and develop more accurate and effective strategies for risk mitigation. Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of developing class-specific risk assessment models to account for the imbalance across different classes.","PeriodicalId":499865,"journal":{"name":"Nicel bilimler dergisi","volume":" 616","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicel bilimler dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51541/nicel.1397941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a statistical analysis assessing the impact of various risk factors on direct compensation property damage (DCPD) claims in private passenger vehicle accidents. Using automobile insurance data in Ontario, Canada for the decade years period between 2003 and 2012, a statistical model of property damage was explored via a generalized linear binary logit mixed model and considered the imbalance between the classes of insureds. The results indicate that several risk factors have a significant impact on the likelihood of DCPD claims, including usage, training, outstanding losses, and incurred losses. The effects of these risk factors were observed under the weights — the number of trials used to generate each success proportion — in the different classes of insureds. The generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) analysis provides a powerful tool for quantifying the impact of risk factors on binary outcomes, which are called DCPD claims and property damage (PD) claims covered by third-party liability (TPL) insurance. These models can also inform insurance underwriting and policy design, focusing on identifying the most significant risk factors. The performance metrics calculated by considering the class imbalance in binary outcomes verify the proposed model’s ability to accurately predict classes. The F1 score, an evaluation metric to measure the performance of classification, was calculated as 0.934. In addition, the PR AUC score, which is the area under the Precision-Recall (PR) curve, was computed as 0.953. These high scores indicate that the proposed model performs well in the classification. The other metrics also support the classification accuracy of the proposed model. The findings of the analysis can help insurers better understand the underlying drivers of property damages and develop more accurate and effective strategies for risk mitigation. Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of developing class-specific risk assessment models to account for the imbalance across different classes.
量化风险因素对加拿大汽车保险直接赔偿财产损失的影响
本研究通过统计分析评估了各种风险因素对私人乘用车事故中直接赔偿财产损失(DCPD)索赔的影响。利用加拿大安大略省 2003 年至 2012 年十年间的汽车保险数据,通过广义线性二元对数混合模型探讨了财产损失的统计模型,并考虑了被保险人类别之间的不平衡。结果表明,几个风险因素对 DCPD 索赔的可能性有显著影响,包括使用、培训、未决损失和已发生损失。这些风险因素的影响在不同类别被保险人的权重--用于产生每个成功比例的试验次数--下均可观察到。广义线性混合模型(GLMMs)分析为量化风险因素对二元结果的影响提供了强有力的工具,二元结果即第三方责任保险(TPL)承保的 DCPD 索赔和财产损失(PD)索赔。这些模型还可以为保险承保和保单设计提供信息,重点是识别最重要的风险因素。考虑到二元结果中的类别不平衡,计算出的性能指标验证了拟议模型准确预测类别的能力。F1 分数是衡量分类性能的评价指标,计算结果为 0.934。此外,PR AUC 分数(即精度-召回(PR)曲线下的面积)计算结果为 0.953。这些高分表明所提出的模型在分类中表现良好。其他指标也证明了建议模型的分类准确性。分析结果可以帮助保险公司更好地了解财产损失的根本原因,并制定更准确、更有效的风险缓解策略。此外,本研究还强调了开发针对具体类别的风险评估模型以考虑不同类别之间不平衡的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信