Is trans-laryngeal ultrasound (TLUS) an accurate and acceptable tool in the assessment of inducible laryngeal obstruction? A protocol for the ILOTUS: A cross-sectional, two-stage feasibility study

C. Slinger, Paul Leong, Sally Spencer, R. Slinger, R. Govender
{"title":"Is trans-laryngeal ultrasound (TLUS) an accurate and acceptable tool in the assessment of inducible laryngeal obstruction? A protocol for the ILOTUS: A cross-sectional, two-stage feasibility study","authors":"C. Slinger, Paul Leong, Sally Spencer, R. Slinger, R. Govender","doi":"10.3233/acs-230003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) describes an inappropriate narrowing of the larynx during breathing in. ILO can lead to several respiratory symptoms and be misidentified and treated as asthma, with associated patient morbidity and healthcare cost. ILO is also known as vocal cord dysfunction, or paradoxical vocal fold movement. The current reference assessment tool for diagnosing ILO is a video-laryngoscopy. However, timely access to specialist diagnostic laryngoscopy services may be challenging, and laryngoscopy may be poorly tolerated. AIMS: The aim of this cross-sectional, two-stage feasibility study is to determine whether abnormal vocal fold movements associated with ILO can be adequately visualised using trans-laryngeal ultrasound (TLUS) namely, the ILOTUS study: (ILO assessment via trans- laryngeal ultrasound). The second aim is to compare TLUS with a reference standard diagnostic tool to ascertain whether it may serve as a less invasive screening tool to assess ILO. Participants’ opinions about the acceptability of TLUS will also be gathered and compared with responses to a validated symptom score questionnaire. METHODS: In stage one, healthy volunteers (n = 30) will undergo TLUS to assess whether the vocal folds can be visualised,and whether narrowing of the vocal folds can be seen when they mimic ILO. Stage 2 will be conducted with a patient population(n = 30) referred to a tertiary airways service for breathlessness assessment. Participants in stage 2 will undergo the reference standard laryngoscopy as well as simultaneous TLUS. The level of agreement between TLUS and laryngoscopy will be evaluated, as well as comparison of symptom scores. DISCUSSION: This study will help inform future studies of the utility of TLUS in the assessment of ILO. This will be valuable for understanding whether TLUS could be offered as a non-invasive option for patients in the assessment of ILO if they are not able to tolerate or access laryngoscopy diagnostic services. It is not intended that TLUS will replace the current reference standard of video-laryngoscopy but may have potential as an early screening tool if found to be non-inferior.","PeriodicalId":93726,"journal":{"name":"Advances in communication and swallowing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in communication and swallowing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/acs-230003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) describes an inappropriate narrowing of the larynx during breathing in. ILO can lead to several respiratory symptoms and be misidentified and treated as asthma, with associated patient morbidity and healthcare cost. ILO is also known as vocal cord dysfunction, or paradoxical vocal fold movement. The current reference assessment tool for diagnosing ILO is a video-laryngoscopy. However, timely access to specialist diagnostic laryngoscopy services may be challenging, and laryngoscopy may be poorly tolerated. AIMS: The aim of this cross-sectional, two-stage feasibility study is to determine whether abnormal vocal fold movements associated with ILO can be adequately visualised using trans-laryngeal ultrasound (TLUS) namely, the ILOTUS study: (ILO assessment via trans- laryngeal ultrasound). The second aim is to compare TLUS with a reference standard diagnostic tool to ascertain whether it may serve as a less invasive screening tool to assess ILO. Participants’ opinions about the acceptability of TLUS will also be gathered and compared with responses to a validated symptom score questionnaire. METHODS: In stage one, healthy volunteers (n = 30) will undergo TLUS to assess whether the vocal folds can be visualised,and whether narrowing of the vocal folds can be seen when they mimic ILO. Stage 2 will be conducted with a patient population(n = 30) referred to a tertiary airways service for breathlessness assessment. Participants in stage 2 will undergo the reference standard laryngoscopy as well as simultaneous TLUS. The level of agreement between TLUS and laryngoscopy will be evaluated, as well as comparison of symptom scores. DISCUSSION: This study will help inform future studies of the utility of TLUS in the assessment of ILO. This will be valuable for understanding whether TLUS could be offered as a non-invasive option for patients in the assessment of ILO if they are not able to tolerate or access laryngoscopy diagnostic services. It is not intended that TLUS will replace the current reference standard of video-laryngoscopy but may have potential as an early screening tool if found to be non-inferior.
经喉超声(TLUS)是评估诱发性喉梗阻的准确且可接受的工具吗?ILOTUS方案:一项横断面、两阶段可行性研究
背景:诱发性喉阻塞(ILO)是指吸气时喉部不适当地狭窄。诱发性喉阻塞(ILO)可导致多种呼吸道症状,并被误认为是哮喘而加以治疗,从而增加患者的发病率和医疗成本。ILO 也被称为声带功能障碍或矛盾性声带运动。目前诊断 ILO 的参考评估工具是视频喉镜检查。然而,及时获得专业的喉镜诊断服务可能具有挑战性,而且喉镜检查的耐受性可能较差。目的: 该横断面、两阶段可行性研究的目的是确定经喉超声(TLUS)是否能充分显示与 ILO 相关的声带异常运动,即 ILOTUS 研究:(通过经喉超声进行 ILO 评估)。第二个目的是将 TLUS 与参考标准诊断工具进行比较,以确定它是否可作为一种创伤较小的筛查工具来评估 ILO。此外,还将收集参与者对 TLUS 可接受性的意见,并将其与对有效症状评分问卷的答复进行比较。方法:在第一阶段,健康志愿者(n = 30)将接受 TLUS 检查,以评估是否能看到声带,以及在模仿 ILO 时是否能看到声带变窄。第二阶段将对转诊到三级气道服务机构进行呼吸困难评估的患者(30 人)进行测试。第二阶段的参与者将接受参考标准喉镜检查和同步 TLUS 检查。将评估 TLUS 与喉镜检查的一致程度,并比较症状评分。讨论:这项研究将有助于为今后有关 TLUS 在评估 ILO 方面的效用的研究提供信息。这将有助于了解,如果患者无法忍受或无法获得喉镜诊断服务,TLUS 是否可作为评估 ILO 的一种无创选择。TLUS 并不打算取代目前的视频喉镜参考标准,但如果发现其不具劣势,则有可能成为一种早期筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信