METHODOLOGY TO INVESTIGATE EFFECT OF PROSTHETIC INTERFACE DESIGN ON RESIDUAL LIMB SOFT TISSUE DEFORMATION

Thomas Arnstein, A. Buis
{"title":"METHODOLOGY TO INVESTIGATE EFFECT OF PROSTHETIC INTERFACE DESIGN ON RESIDUAL LIMB SOFT TISSUE DEFORMATION","authors":"Thomas Arnstein, A. Buis","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v6i1.42196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Residual limb discomfort and injury is a common experience for people living with lower limb amputation. Frequently, inadequate load distribution between the prosthetic device and the residual limb is the root cause of this issue. To advance our understanding of prosthetic interface fit, tools are needed to evaluate the mechanical interaction at the prosthetic interface, allowing interface designs to be evaluated and optimised.\nOBJECTIVES: Present a methodology report designed to facilitate comprehension of the mechanical interaction between the prosthetic interface and the residual limb. As a pilot study, this methodology is used to compare a hands-on and hands-off interface for a single transtibial prosthesis user using secondary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data.\nMETHODOLOGY: MRI data of the residual limb while wearing a prosthetic interface is segmented into a hard tissue and a skin surface model. These models are exported as stereolithography (STL) files. Two methods are used to analyse the interface designs. Firstly, CloudCompare software is used to compute the nearest vertex on the skin surface for every vertex on the compiled internal bony surface for both interface types. Secondly, CloudCompare software is used to compare registered skin surfaces of the residual limb while wearing the hands-on and hands-off interfaces.\nFINDINGS: The maximum and minimum nearest distances between the internal bony surface and skin surface were similar between interface types. However, the distribution of nearest distances was different. When comparing the skin surface while wearing both interfaces, where the fit is more compressive can be visualized. For the dataset used in this study, the classic features of a hands-on Patella Tendon Bearing interface and hands-off pressure cast interface could be identified.\nCONCLUSION: The methodology presented in this report may give researchers a further tool to better understand how interface designs affect the soft tissues of the residual limb.\nLayman's Abstract\nIf a person loses all or part of their leg because of injury or disease, they may use a replacement limb to help them walk again. The replacement limb is attached to their remaining leg using a rigid shell and flexible liner. Sometimes, the skin, muscles, and other tissues of their remaining leg are damaged while wearing the replacement limb. Often, this is because the replacement limb fits poorly to their remaining leg. In order to design replacement limbs that do not cause injury, a better understanding of replacement limb fit is required. In this study, a method to understand how replacement limbs deform remaining limb skin, muscles, and other tissues, is presented. 3D medical images are taken of a person’s remaining leg while they wear two different types of replacement limbs. These images are processed into 3D models and then analysed to investigate deformation. Firstly, deformation of the remaining leg, caused by the replacement limb, is calculated based on the distance between the bone surface and skin surface of the remaining leg. Secondly, the shape of the outer surface of the remaining leg while wearing the different replacement limbs is compared. When this method was used to compare the remaining leg of a person while wearing two different types of replacement limb, using previously acquired medical 3D images, differences in the shape of the remaining limb were found. This method may be useful to help design better replacement limbs that do not cause injury in the future.\nArticle PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/42196/32357\nHow To Cite: Arnstein T, Buis A. Methodology to investigate effect of prosthetic interface design on residual limb soft tissue deformation. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2023; Volume 6, Issue 1, No.7. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v6i1.42196\nCorresponding Author: Arjan Buis, PhD Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.E-Mail: arjan.buis@strath.ac.ukORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-293X","PeriodicalId":503370,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS JOURNAL","volume":" 732","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v6i1.42196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residual limb discomfort and injury is a common experience for people living with lower limb amputation. Frequently, inadequate load distribution between the prosthetic device and the residual limb is the root cause of this issue. To advance our understanding of prosthetic interface fit, tools are needed to evaluate the mechanical interaction at the prosthetic interface, allowing interface designs to be evaluated and optimised. OBJECTIVES: Present a methodology report designed to facilitate comprehension of the mechanical interaction between the prosthetic interface and the residual limb. As a pilot study, this methodology is used to compare a hands-on and hands-off interface for a single transtibial prosthesis user using secondary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. METHODOLOGY: MRI data of the residual limb while wearing a prosthetic interface is segmented into a hard tissue and a skin surface model. These models are exported as stereolithography (STL) files. Two methods are used to analyse the interface designs. Firstly, CloudCompare software is used to compute the nearest vertex on the skin surface for every vertex on the compiled internal bony surface for both interface types. Secondly, CloudCompare software is used to compare registered skin surfaces of the residual limb while wearing the hands-on and hands-off interfaces. FINDINGS: The maximum and minimum nearest distances between the internal bony surface and skin surface were similar between interface types. However, the distribution of nearest distances was different. When comparing the skin surface while wearing both interfaces, where the fit is more compressive can be visualized. For the dataset used in this study, the classic features of a hands-on Patella Tendon Bearing interface and hands-off pressure cast interface could be identified. CONCLUSION: The methodology presented in this report may give researchers a further tool to better understand how interface designs affect the soft tissues of the residual limb. Layman's Abstract If a person loses all or part of their leg because of injury or disease, they may use a replacement limb to help them walk again. The replacement limb is attached to their remaining leg using a rigid shell and flexible liner. Sometimes, the skin, muscles, and other tissues of their remaining leg are damaged while wearing the replacement limb. Often, this is because the replacement limb fits poorly to their remaining leg. In order to design replacement limbs that do not cause injury, a better understanding of replacement limb fit is required. In this study, a method to understand how replacement limbs deform remaining limb skin, muscles, and other tissues, is presented. 3D medical images are taken of a person’s remaining leg while they wear two different types of replacement limbs. These images are processed into 3D models and then analysed to investigate deformation. Firstly, deformation of the remaining leg, caused by the replacement limb, is calculated based on the distance between the bone surface and skin surface of the remaining leg. Secondly, the shape of the outer surface of the remaining leg while wearing the different replacement limbs is compared. When this method was used to compare the remaining leg of a person while wearing two different types of replacement limb, using previously acquired medical 3D images, differences in the shape of the remaining limb were found. This method may be useful to help design better replacement limbs that do not cause injury in the future. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/42196/32357 How To Cite: Arnstein T, Buis A. Methodology to investigate effect of prosthetic interface design on residual limb soft tissue deformation. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2023; Volume 6, Issue 1, No.7. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v6i1.42196 Corresponding Author: Arjan Buis, PhD Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.E-Mail: arjan.buis@strath.ac.ukORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-293X
假肢接口设计对残肢软组织变形影响的研究方法
背景:对于下肢截肢者来说,残肢不适和损伤是一种常见症状。通常,假肢装置和残肢之间的负荷分配不足是造成这一问题的根本原因。为了加深我们对假肢接口适配性的理解,我们需要一些工具来评估假肢接口的机械相互作用,从而对接口设计进行评估和优化:提出一份方法报告,旨在帮助理解假肢界面与残肢之间的机械相互作用。作为一项试验性研究,该方法使用二次核磁共振成像(MRI)数据,比较了单个经胫假肢使用者的 "动手 "和 "不动手 "界面。这些模型以立体光刻(STL)文件的形式输出。使用两种方法对界面设计进行分析。首先,使用 CloudCompare 软件为两种界面类型的编译内骨表面上的每个顶点计算皮肤表面上最近的顶点。其次,使用 CloudCompare 软件比较佩戴手持式和非手持式界面时残肢皮肤表面的注册情况。然而,最近距离的分布却不同。在比较佩戴两种界面时的皮肤表面时,可以直观地看到贴合度更高的地方。结论:本报告中介绍的方法可为研究人员提供进一步的工具,以更好地了解接口设计如何影响残肢软组织。替代肢体使用刚性外壳和柔性衬垫连接到残腿上。有时,在佩戴义肢的过程中,残肢的皮肤、肌肉和其他组织会受到损伤。这通常是因为义肢与残腿的贴合度较差。为了设计出不会造成损伤的义肢,需要更好地了解义肢的贴合情况。本研究介绍了一种了解替换肢体如何使残肢皮肤、肌肉和其他组织变形的方法。当一个人佩戴两种不同类型的替换肢体时,他的残肢会被拍摄成三维医学图像。这些图像被处理成三维模型,然后进行分析以研究变形情况。首先,根据残肢骨骼表面和皮肤表面之间的距离,计算替换肢体造成的残肢变形。其次,比较佩戴不同假肢时残肢外表面的形状。当使用这种方法,利用之前获得的医学三维图像,比较一个人在佩戴两种不同类型的假肢时剩余腿部的形状时,发现剩余腿部的形状存在差异。这种方法可能有助于设计出更好的替代肢体,避免将来造成伤害。文章 PDF 链接:https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/42196/32357How To Cite:Arnstein T, Buis A. 研究假肢接口设计对残肢软组织变形影响的方法。加拿大假肢与矫正杂志》。2023; Volume 6, Issue 1, No.7. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v6i1.42196Corresponding Author:Arjan Buis, PhD 苏格兰格拉斯哥斯特拉思克莱德大学工程学院生物医学工程系.E-Mail: arjan.buis@strath.ac.ukORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-293X
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信