The Yoke as a Metaphor in the Ancient World: From Symbolizing Imperial Domination to Signifying Subjugation

Е. V. Rung, Е. A. Venidiktova
{"title":"The Yoke as a Metaphor in the Ancient World: From Symbolizing Imperial Domination to Signifying Subjugation","authors":"Е. V. Rung, Е. A. Venidiktova","doi":"10.26907/2541-7738.2023.4-5.54-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the perception of the yoke as a symbol of domination and subordination in texts from Ancient Mesopotamia and the Middle East, as well as from ancient Greek and Roman writings. The metaphor of the yoke is analyzed from the perspective of both the conquerors and subjugated. In the texts of the Assyrian kings, conquest is perceived as the imposition of a yoke, while the fight for independence is portrayed as liberation from it. The Greeks adopted the concept of the yoke from the East, which explains why it was often used to describe the Greco-Persian conflict in the ancient Greek tradition. In many cases, the yoke was not only a metaphor for subordination but also had a military-political meaning. For example, the Assyrians harnessed captives to the royal chariot, while the Romans drove away captive enemies “under the yoke”, which was a structure consisting of two spears or pillars stuck into the ground with a third spear or pillar as a crossbar.","PeriodicalId":503809,"journal":{"name":"Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki","volume":" 752","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2023.4-5.54-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the perception of the yoke as a symbol of domination and subordination in texts from Ancient Mesopotamia and the Middle East, as well as from ancient Greek and Roman writings. The metaphor of the yoke is analyzed from the perspective of both the conquerors and subjugated. In the texts of the Assyrian kings, conquest is perceived as the imposition of a yoke, while the fight for independence is portrayed as liberation from it. The Greeks adopted the concept of the yoke from the East, which explains why it was often used to describe the Greco-Persian conflict in the ancient Greek tradition. In many cases, the yoke was not only a metaphor for subordination but also had a military-political meaning. For example, the Assyrians harnessed captives to the royal chariot, while the Romans drove away captive enemies “under the yoke”, which was a structure consisting of two spears or pillars stuck into the ground with a third spear or pillar as a crossbar.
古代世界中作为隐喻的枷锁:从象征帝国统治到象征征服
本文探讨了古代美索不达米亚和中东以及古希腊和古罗马著作中将枷锁视为统治和从属象征的观点。本文从征服者和被征服者的角度分析了枷锁的隐喻。在亚述国王的文字中,征服被视为强加枷锁,而争取独立则被描绘成摆脱枷锁。希腊人从东方接受了 "枷锁 "的概念,这也解释了为什么在古希腊传统中,"枷锁 "经常被用来描述希腊-波斯冲突。在许多情况下,枷锁不仅隐喻从属关系,还具有军事政治含义。例如,亚述人将俘虏套在皇家战车上,而罗马人则 "用轭 "驱赶被俘虏的敌人。"轭 "是一种结构,由插在地上的两根长矛或支柱组成,第三根长矛或支柱作为横杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信