Quickly Determining Who Won an Election

Lisa Hellerstein, Naifeng Liu, Kevin Schewior
{"title":"Quickly Determining Who Won an Election","authors":"Lisa Hellerstein, Naifeng Liu, Kevin Schewior","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers elections in which voters choose one candidate each, independently according to known probability distributions. A candidate receiving a strict majority (absolute or relative, depending on the version) wins. After the voters have made their choices, each vote can be inspected to determine which candidate received that vote. The time (or cost) to inspect each of the votes is known in advance. The task is to (possibly adaptively) determine the order in which to inspect the votes, so as to minimize the expected time to determine which candidate has won the election. We design polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithms for both the absolute-majority and the relative-majority version. Both algorithms are based on a two-phase approach. In the first phase, the algorithms reduce the number of relevant candidates to $O(1)$, and in the second phase they utilize techniques from the literature on stochastic function evaluation to handle the remaining candidates. In the case of absolute majority, we show that the same can be achieved with only two rounds of adaptivity.","PeriodicalId":123734,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology Convergence and Services","volume":"24 8","pages":"61:1-61:14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology Convergence and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper considers elections in which voters choose one candidate each, independently according to known probability distributions. A candidate receiving a strict majority (absolute or relative, depending on the version) wins. After the voters have made their choices, each vote can be inspected to determine which candidate received that vote. The time (or cost) to inspect each of the votes is known in advance. The task is to (possibly adaptively) determine the order in which to inspect the votes, so as to minimize the expected time to determine which candidate has won the election. We design polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithms for both the absolute-majority and the relative-majority version. Both algorithms are based on a two-phase approach. In the first phase, the algorithms reduce the number of relevant candidates to $O(1)$, and in the second phase they utilize techniques from the literature on stochastic function evaluation to handle the remaining candidates. In the case of absolute majority, we show that the same can be achieved with only two rounds of adaptivity.
快速确定谁赢得了选举
本文研究的是选民根据已知概率分布各自选择一名候选人的选举。获得绝对多数(绝对或相对,取决于版本)的候选人获胜。选民做出选择后,可以对每张选票进行检查,以确定哪位候选人获得了这一选票。检查每张选票的时间(或成本)是事先已知的。我们的任务是(可能是自适应地)确定检查选票的顺序,从而最大限度地减少确定哪位候选人赢得选举的预期时间。我们为绝对多数票和相对多数票版本设计了多项式时间恒因子近似算法。这两种算法都基于两阶段方法。在第一阶段,算法将相关候选数减少到 $O(1)$;在第二阶段,算法利用随机函数评估文献中的技术来处理剩余的候选数。在绝对多数的情况下,我们证明只需两轮自适应就能达到同样的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信