Exploring the valued outcomes of school-based speech-language therapy services: a sequential iterative design

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Peter T Cahill, Stella Ng, L. Turkstra, Mark A. Ferro, Wenonah N. Campbell
{"title":"Exploring the valued outcomes of school-based speech-language therapy services: a sequential iterative design","authors":"Peter T Cahill, Stella Ng, L. Turkstra, Mark A. Ferro, Wenonah N. Campbell","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1290800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Achieving outcomes that community members value is essential to high-quality, family-centred care. These valued outcomes should inform the production and interpretation of research evidence. To date, outcomes included in studies of service delivery models for speech-language services in schools have been narrowly defined, and do not match the outcomes suggested as important by families, teachers, and children. The most important outcomes of school-based, speech-languages services have not been directly and systematically investigated. We aimed to address this gap by asking school community members what outcomes were most relevant to evaluating and improving the delivery of speech-language services in schools.A sequential, iterative mixed-method study was conducted using interviews with 14 family members, educators, and speech-language therapists that asked what outcomes or impacts of school-based services they considered most important or valuable. Summative content analysis was used to analyse the data. Structural topic modelling between rounds of qualitative analysis was used to describe both the quality and the quantity of the interview content. School community members’ perspectives were compared through estimation of topic proportions within interviews from each member group and through qualitative comparison.Structural topic modelling diagnostics and qualitative interpretation of topic output suggested a six-topic solution. This solution was estimated successfully and yielded the following topics: (1) meeting all needs appropriately, (2) teamwork and collaboration, (3) building capacities, (4) supporting individual student needs in context, (5) coordinating care, and finally (6) supporting core educational goals. Families focused on school-based services meeting all needs appropriately and coordinating care, while educators highlighted supporting individual student needs in context. By contrast, speech-language therapists emphasized building capacities and supporting core educational goals. All school community members agreed that current assessment tools and outcome measures were inadequate to capture the most important impacts of school-based services.Outcomes identified by school community members as important or valuable were broad, and included individual student outcomes, interpersonal outcomes, and systems-level outcomes. Although these outcomes were discussed by all member groups, each group focused on different outcomes in the interviews, suggesting differences in the prioritization of outcomes. We recommend building consensus regarding the most important outcomes for school-based speech-language services, as well as the prioritization of outcomes for measure development.","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1290800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving outcomes that community members value is essential to high-quality, family-centred care. These valued outcomes should inform the production and interpretation of research evidence. To date, outcomes included in studies of service delivery models for speech-language services in schools have been narrowly defined, and do not match the outcomes suggested as important by families, teachers, and children. The most important outcomes of school-based, speech-languages services have not been directly and systematically investigated. We aimed to address this gap by asking school community members what outcomes were most relevant to evaluating and improving the delivery of speech-language services in schools.A sequential, iterative mixed-method study was conducted using interviews with 14 family members, educators, and speech-language therapists that asked what outcomes or impacts of school-based services they considered most important or valuable. Summative content analysis was used to analyse the data. Structural topic modelling between rounds of qualitative analysis was used to describe both the quality and the quantity of the interview content. School community members’ perspectives were compared through estimation of topic proportions within interviews from each member group and through qualitative comparison.Structural topic modelling diagnostics and qualitative interpretation of topic output suggested a six-topic solution. This solution was estimated successfully and yielded the following topics: (1) meeting all needs appropriately, (2) teamwork and collaboration, (3) building capacities, (4) supporting individual student needs in context, (5) coordinating care, and finally (6) supporting core educational goals. Families focused on school-based services meeting all needs appropriately and coordinating care, while educators highlighted supporting individual student needs in context. By contrast, speech-language therapists emphasized building capacities and supporting core educational goals. All school community members agreed that current assessment tools and outcome measures were inadequate to capture the most important impacts of school-based services.Outcomes identified by school community members as important or valuable were broad, and included individual student outcomes, interpersonal outcomes, and systems-level outcomes. Although these outcomes were discussed by all member groups, each group focused on different outcomes in the interviews, suggesting differences in the prioritization of outcomes. We recommend building consensus regarding the most important outcomes for school-based speech-language services, as well as the prioritization of outcomes for measure development.
探索校本言语治疗服务的价值成果:顺序迭代设计
实现社区成员所珍视的成果对于高质量、以家庭为中心的护理至关重要。这些有价值的成果应为研究证据的产生和解释提供依据。迄今为止,有关学校言语语言服务提供模式的研究中所包含的成果都是狭义的,与家庭、教师和儿童提出的重要成果并不相符。校本言语语言服务最重要的成果尚未得到直接、系统的调查。我们对 14 位家庭成员、教育工作者和言语治疗师进行了访谈,询问他们认为校本服务最重要或最有价值的成果或影响是什么。研究采用总结性内容分析法对数据进行分析。各轮定性分析之间的结构主题模型被用来描述访谈内容的质量和数量。通过对各成员小组访谈内容中的主题比例进行估算,并通过定性比较,对学校社区成员的观点进行了比较。该方案估算成功,得出以下主题:(1) 恰当地满足所有需求,(2) 团队合作与协作,(3) 能力建设,(4) 在情境中支持学生的个人需求,(5) 协调照顾,最后 (6) 支持核心教育目标。家庭关注的重点是校本服务要满足所有适当的需求并协调护理,而教育工作者则强调要根据具体情况支持学生的个别需求。相比之下,言语治疗师则强调能力建设和支持核心教育目标。所有学校社区成员都认为,目前的评估工具和成果衡量标准不足以体现校本服务最重要的影响。学校社区成员认为重要或有价值的成果非常广泛,包括学生个人成果、人际关系成果和系统层面的成果。尽管所有成员小组都讨论了这些成果,但每个小组在访谈中都关注不同的成果,这表明在成果的优先排序上存在差异。我们建议就校本言语语言服务最重要的成果达成共识,并为制定衡量标准确定成果的优先次序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信