The Modified 5-Factor Frailty Score May Not be Useful in Predicting Complications and Unplanned Readmission After 1-Level or 2-Level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

G. Camino-Willhuber, Soji Tani, L. Schonnagel, T. Caffard, E. Chiapparelli, Krizia Amoroso, Bruno Verna, A. Arzani, Jiaqi Zhu, J. Shue, William D. Zelenty, Gbolabo Sokunbi, D. Lebl, F. Cammisa, F. Girardi, A. Hughes, A. Sama
{"title":"The Modified 5-Factor Frailty Score May Not be Useful in Predicting Complications and Unplanned Readmission After 1-Level or 2-Level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion","authors":"G. Camino-Willhuber, Soji Tani, L. Schonnagel, T. Caffard, E. Chiapparelli, Krizia Amoroso, Bruno Verna, A. Arzani, Jiaqi Zhu, J. Shue, William D. Zelenty, Gbolabo Sokunbi, D. Lebl, F. Cammisa, F. Girardi, A. Hughes, A. Sama","doi":"10.1177/15563316231222287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been shown to be a reliable risk stratification tool in different spine procedures. Its usefulness to predict complications after 1-level or 2-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) has not been studied extensively. We aimed to assess the usefulness of the mFI-5 in 1-level or 2-level ACDF surgery by asking the following questions: (1) Is the mFI-5 a reliable tool to predict complications after 1-level or 2-level ACDF? (2) Is the mFI-5 useful in predicting prolonged hospital stay after 1-level or 2-level ACDF? (3) Is the mFI-5 useful in predicting readmission after 1-level or 2-level ACDF? We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level ACDF at our institution. The mFI-5 was calculated based on the presence of 5 comorbidities: (1) congestive heart failure, (2) diabetes mellitus, (3) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (4) partially or totally dependent functional status, and (5) hypertension requiring medication. Patients were classified in 3 groups: not frail (mFI-5 items = 0), pre-frail (mFI-5 items = 1), and frail (mFI-5 items ≥2). Postoperative complications, length of stay, and readmission were recorded. In the 662 patients included (mean age 51.4 ± 10.4 years), surgical and medical complications were not significantly different among groups. Lengths of stay and readmission rates were both significantly higher in the pre-frail group. Our study findings suggest that the mFI-5 might not be reliable to assess preoperative risk after 1-level or 2-level ACDF.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316231222287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been shown to be a reliable risk stratification tool in different spine procedures. Its usefulness to predict complications after 1-level or 2-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) has not been studied extensively. We aimed to assess the usefulness of the mFI-5 in 1-level or 2-level ACDF surgery by asking the following questions: (1) Is the mFI-5 a reliable tool to predict complications after 1-level or 2-level ACDF? (2) Is the mFI-5 useful in predicting prolonged hospital stay after 1-level or 2-level ACDF? (3) Is the mFI-5 useful in predicting readmission after 1-level or 2-level ACDF? We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level ACDF at our institution. The mFI-5 was calculated based on the presence of 5 comorbidities: (1) congestive heart failure, (2) diabetes mellitus, (3) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (4) partially or totally dependent functional status, and (5) hypertension requiring medication. Patients were classified in 3 groups: not frail (mFI-5 items = 0), pre-frail (mFI-5 items = 1), and frail (mFI-5 items ≥2). Postoperative complications, length of stay, and readmission were recorded. In the 662 patients included (mean age 51.4 ± 10.4 years), surgical and medical complications were not significantly different among groups. Lengths of stay and readmission rates were both significantly higher in the pre-frail group. Our study findings suggest that the mFI-5 might not be reliable to assess preoperative risk after 1-level or 2-level ACDF.
改良的 5 要素虚弱评分可能无法预测 1 级或 2 级颈椎前路减压融合术后的并发症和计划外再入院情况
改良虚弱指数(mFI-5)已被证明是不同脊柱手术中可靠的风险分层工具。但该指数在预测1级或2级颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)术后并发症方面的实用性尚未得到广泛研究。我们旨在通过以下问题评估 mFI-5 在 1 层或 2 层 ACDF 手术中的实用性:(1)mFI-5 是预测 1 层或 2 层 ACDF 术后并发症的可靠工具吗?(2)mFI-5 是否有助于预测 1 级或 2 级 ACDF 术后住院时间的延长?(3) mFI-5 是否有助于预测 1 级或 2 级 ACDF 后的再入院?我们对在本院接受 1 级或 2 级 ACDF 的患者病历进行了回顾性分析。mFI-5 的计算基于 5 种合并症的存在:(1)充血性心力衰竭;(2)糖尿病;(3)慢性阻塞性肺病;(4)部分或完全依赖的功能状态;(5)需要药物治疗的高血压。患者分为三组:不虚弱(mFI-5 项 = 0)、前期虚弱(mFI-5 项 = 1)和虚弱(mFI-5 项≥2)。记录了术后并发症、住院时间和再入院情况。在纳入的 662 名患者中(平均年龄为 51.4 ± 10.4 岁),各组之间的手术和内科并发症无明显差异。前期虚弱组的住院时间和再入院率均明显较高。我们的研究结果表明,用 mFI-5 评估 1 级或 2 级 ACDF 术前风险可能并不可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信