Results of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Renal Impairment: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Q3 Medicine
M. Soloveva, M. Solovev, D. Mironova, L. Mendeleeva
{"title":"Results of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Renal Impairment: A Retrospective Single-Center Study","authors":"M. Soloveva, M. Solovev, D. Mironova, L. Mendeleeva","doi":"10.18502/ijhoscr.v18i1.14745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To assess the efficacy of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with acute renal failure. \nMaterials and Methods: A retrospective single-center study included 64 patients (30 men, 34 women) with MM and kidney damage at the onset of the disease, aged 19 to 65 years (median 54), who underwent auto-HSCT from 2013 to 2019. 23 patients (36%) were dialysis-dependent at the time of diagnosis. The analysis was carried out in two groups: the \"HD-\" group (patients who were independent of hemodialysis during auto-HSCT, n = 54), and the \"HD +\" group (patients who underwent auto-HSCT while treated with programmed hemodialysis, n = 10). Research results were statistically processed using the Statistica software (version 10.0); the data obtained were presented graphically. Statistical analysis was performed using survival analysis (using the Kaplan-Meier method, with a Log-Rank Test) and frequency analysis (using contingency tables and Fisher's test). \nResults: The patients dependent on hemodialysis were significantly more likely to require red blood cell transfusions compared to the dialysis-independent patients (100% versus 35%, p = 0.0001). Reactivation of a herpes viral infection and reversible toxic encephalopathy developed significantly more often in the patients from the “HD +” group compared with the patients from the “HD-” group (30% versus 6%, p = 0.04 and 20% versus 0%, p = 0.02, respectively). As a result of the treatment (induction + auto-HSCT), 14 patients (61%) became hemodialysis-independent. There was no transplant-related mortality. With a median follow-up of 48 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 70% and 42%, respectively. \nConclusion: Auto-HSCT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with MM complicated by acute kidney injury. Fourteen of 23 (61%) patients became dialysis-independent.","PeriodicalId":38991,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Research","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v18i1.14745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess the efficacy of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with acute renal failure. Materials and Methods: A retrospective single-center study included 64 patients (30 men, 34 women) with MM and kidney damage at the onset of the disease, aged 19 to 65 years (median 54), who underwent auto-HSCT from 2013 to 2019. 23 patients (36%) were dialysis-dependent at the time of diagnosis. The analysis was carried out in two groups: the "HD-" group (patients who were independent of hemodialysis during auto-HSCT, n = 54), and the "HD +" group (patients who underwent auto-HSCT while treated with programmed hemodialysis, n = 10). Research results were statistically processed using the Statistica software (version 10.0); the data obtained were presented graphically. Statistical analysis was performed using survival analysis (using the Kaplan-Meier method, with a Log-Rank Test) and frequency analysis (using contingency tables and Fisher's test). Results: The patients dependent on hemodialysis were significantly more likely to require red blood cell transfusions compared to the dialysis-independent patients (100% versus 35%, p = 0.0001). Reactivation of a herpes viral infection and reversible toxic encephalopathy developed significantly more often in the patients from the “HD +” group compared with the patients from the “HD-” group (30% versus 6%, p = 0.04 and 20% versus 0%, p = 0.02, respectively). As a result of the treatment (induction + auto-HSCT), 14 patients (61%) became hemodialysis-independent. There was no transplant-related mortality. With a median follow-up of 48 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 70% and 42%, respectively. Conclusion: Auto-HSCT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with MM complicated by acute kidney injury. Fourteen of 23 (61%) patients became dialysis-independent.
多发性骨髓瘤(MM)合并肾功能损害患者的自体造血干细胞移植结果:一项回顾性单中心研究
背景:评估自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HSCT)对急性肾功能衰竭的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的疗效。材料与方法:一项回顾性单中心研究纳入了 64 名(30 名男性,34 名女性)MM 患者,他们在发病时患有肾损伤,年龄在 19 岁至 65 岁之间(中位数为 54 岁),在 2013 年至 2019 年期间接受了自体造血干细胞移植。23名患者(36%)在确诊时依赖透析。分析分两组进行:"HD-"组(在自动血液干细胞移植期间不依赖血液透析的患者,n = 54)和 "HD +"组(在接受程序性血液透析治疗的同时接受自动血液干细胞移植的患者,n = 10)。研究结果使用 Statistica 软件(10.0 版)进行统计处理;所得数据以图表形式呈现。统计分析采用生存分析法(使用 Kaplan-Meier 法和 Log-Rank 检验)和频率分析法(使用或然率表和 Fisher's 检验)。结果与不依赖透析的患者相比,依赖血液透析的患者需要输注红细胞的几率明显更高(100% 对 35%,P = 0.0001)。与 "血液透析+"组患者相比,"血液透析+"组患者出现疱疹病毒感染再激活和可逆性中毒性脑病的几率明显更高(分别为 30% 对 6%,p = 0.04 和 20% 对 0%,p = 0.02)。治疗(诱导+自体供血干细胞移植)的结果是,14 名患者(61%)实现了血液透析独立。没有出现与移植相关的死亡率。中位随访时间为48个月,5年总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为70%和42%。结论对于并发急性肾损伤的 MM 患者,自体 HSCT 是一种安全有效的治疗方法。23例患者中有14例(61%)实现了透析独立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信