Christian T. Michael, Sayed A. Almohri, J. Linderman, Denise E. Kirschner
{"title":"A framework for multi-scale intervention modeling: virtual cohorts, virtual clinical trials, and model-to-model comparisons","authors":"Christian T. Michael, Sayed A. Almohri, J. Linderman, Denise E. Kirschner","doi":"10.3389/fsysb.2023.1283341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational models of disease progression have been constructed for a myriad of pathologies. Typically, the conceptual implementation for pathology-related in silico intervention studies has been ad hoc and similar in design to experimental studies. We introduce a multi-scale interventional design (MID) framework toward two key goals: tracking of disease dynamics from within-body to patient to population scale; and tracking impact(s) of interventions across these same spatial scales. Our MID framework prioritizes investigation of impact on individual patients within virtual pre-clinical trials, instead of replicating the design of experimental studies. We apply a MID framework to develop, organize, and analyze a cohort of virtual patients for the study of tuberculosis (TB) as an example disease. For this study, we use HostSim: our next-generation whole patient-scale computational model of individuals infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. HostSim captures infection within lungs by tracking multiple granulomas, together with dynamics occurring with blood and lymph node compartments, the compartments involved during pulmonary TB. We extend HostSim to include a simple drug intervention as an example of our approach and use our MID framework to quantify the impact of treatment at cellular and tissue (granuloma), patient (lungs, lymph nodes and blood), and population scales. Sensitivity analyses allow us to determine which features of virtual patients are the strongest predictors of intervention efficacy across scales. These insights allow us to identify patient-heterogeneous mechanisms that drive outcomes across scales.","PeriodicalId":73109,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in systems biology","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in systems biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsysb.2023.1283341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Computational models of disease progression have been constructed for a myriad of pathologies. Typically, the conceptual implementation for pathology-related in silico intervention studies has been ad hoc and similar in design to experimental studies. We introduce a multi-scale interventional design (MID) framework toward two key goals: tracking of disease dynamics from within-body to patient to population scale; and tracking impact(s) of interventions across these same spatial scales. Our MID framework prioritizes investigation of impact on individual patients within virtual pre-clinical trials, instead of replicating the design of experimental studies. We apply a MID framework to develop, organize, and analyze a cohort of virtual patients for the study of tuberculosis (TB) as an example disease. For this study, we use HostSim: our next-generation whole patient-scale computational model of individuals infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. HostSim captures infection within lungs by tracking multiple granulomas, together with dynamics occurring with blood and lymph node compartments, the compartments involved during pulmonary TB. We extend HostSim to include a simple drug intervention as an example of our approach and use our MID framework to quantify the impact of treatment at cellular and tissue (granuloma), patient (lungs, lymph nodes and blood), and population scales. Sensitivity analyses allow us to determine which features of virtual patients are the strongest predictors of intervention efficacy across scales. These insights allow us to identify patient-heterogeneous mechanisms that drive outcomes across scales.