Results of a prospective randomized study comparing efficacy and safety of refralon and amiodarone for cardioversion in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and flutter

D. Gagloeva, N. Y. Mironov, K. Dzaurova, M. A. Zelberg, Y. Yuricheva, S. Sokolov, S. Golitsyn
{"title":"Results of a prospective randomized study comparing efficacy and safety of refralon and amiodarone for cardioversion in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and flutter","authors":"D. Gagloeva, N. Y. Mironov, K. Dzaurova, M. A. Zelberg, Y. Yuricheva, S. Sokolov, S. Golitsyn","doi":"10.35336/va-1289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To compare efficacy and safety of refralon and amiodarone for cardioversion in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF/AFL). Methods. The study included 60 patients (32 men and 28 women) with symptomatic paroxysmal AF/AFL. All patients underwent a preliminary examination to exclude contraindications to cardioversion. The procedure of pharmacological cardioversion was carried out in the intensive care unit. By the method of envelope randomization, patients were divided into equal groups of refralon and amiodarone, 30 participants each. Both groups did not differ significantly in terms of main clinical characteristics. Cardioversion with refralon consisted of four subsequent iv injections: 5-5 - 10-10 µg/kg of body weight at intervals of 15 minutes. Patients of the second group were intravenously administered amiodarone at a dose of 5 mg/kg of body weight for 20-60 minutes, depending on the tolerability of the drug. In case of AF/AFL maintaining after 60 minutes from the start of administration, the infusion of amiodarone 100 mg/h continued until restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) or until the maximal total dose of 1200 mg/day was reached. Patients were observed for 24 hours.Results. SR restored in 96.7% (29 of 30) of patients in the refralon group, of which 56.7% (17 of 30) - after a dose of 5 μg / kg. In the amiodarone group SR restored in 53.3% (16 of 30) patients (p<0.001). Median time to arrhythmia conversion in refralon group was 14 [7;23] min, while in amiodarone group it was 150 [82;240] min (p<0.001). Within 60 minutes SR was restored in 26 patients in group of refralon and only in 4 patients in group of amiodarone (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events, bradyarrhythmias, lowering of blood pressure, and QT prolongation between the groups.Conclusion. In randomized trial Refralon demonstrated higher rate of successful AF/AFL conversion and shorter time to SR restoration than amiodarone. The most of patients restored SR after administration of the lowest dose of refralon, that ensures the safety of cardioversion.","PeriodicalId":504293,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35336/va-1289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To compare efficacy and safety of refralon and amiodarone for cardioversion in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF/AFL). Methods. The study included 60 patients (32 men and 28 women) with symptomatic paroxysmal AF/AFL. All patients underwent a preliminary examination to exclude contraindications to cardioversion. The procedure of pharmacological cardioversion was carried out in the intensive care unit. By the method of envelope randomization, patients were divided into equal groups of refralon and amiodarone, 30 participants each. Both groups did not differ significantly in terms of main clinical characteristics. Cardioversion with refralon consisted of four subsequent iv injections: 5-5 - 10-10 µg/kg of body weight at intervals of 15 minutes. Patients of the second group were intravenously administered amiodarone at a dose of 5 mg/kg of body weight for 20-60 minutes, depending on the tolerability of the drug. In case of AF/AFL maintaining after 60 minutes from the start of administration, the infusion of amiodarone 100 mg/h continued until restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) or until the maximal total dose of 1200 mg/day was reached. Patients were observed for 24 hours.Results. SR restored in 96.7% (29 of 30) of patients in the refralon group, of which 56.7% (17 of 30) - after a dose of 5 μg / kg. In the amiodarone group SR restored in 53.3% (16 of 30) patients (p<0.001). Median time to arrhythmia conversion in refralon group was 14 [7;23] min, while in amiodarone group it was 150 [82;240] min (p<0.001). Within 60 minutes SR was restored in 26 patients in group of refralon and only in 4 patients in group of amiodarone (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events, bradyarrhythmias, lowering of blood pressure, and QT prolongation between the groups.Conclusion. In randomized trial Refralon demonstrated higher rate of successful AF/AFL conversion and shorter time to SR restoration than amiodarone. The most of patients restored SR after administration of the lowest dose of refralon, that ensures the safety of cardioversion.
前瞻性随机研究结果:比较雷速隆和胺碘酮对阵发性心房颤动和扑动患者心脏复律的疗效和安全性
目的比较雷速隆和胺碘酮用于阵发性心房颤动和扑动(AF/AFL)患者心脏复律的疗效和安全性。研究方法研究对象包括 60 名有症状的阵发性房颤/心房扑动患者(32 名男性和 28 名女性)。所有患者均接受了初步检查,以排除心脏除颤术的禁忌症。药物心脏除颤手术在重症监护室进行。通过包络随机法,患者被分为雷复隆和胺碘酮两组,每组各30人。两组患者的主要临床特征无明显差异。雷复隆心脏起博器随后进行四次静脉注射:5-5 - 10-10 µg/kg 体重,每隔 15 分钟注射一次。第二组患者静脉注射胺碘酮,剂量为每公斤体重 5 毫克,持续 20-60 分钟,视药物耐受性而定。如果在给药 60 分钟后房颤/心律失常仍然存在,则继续输注 100 毫克/小时的胺碘酮,直到恢复窦性心律(SR)或达到每天 1200 毫克的最大总剂量。对患者进行 24 小时观察。雷复隆组 96.7%(30 例中的 29 例)的患者恢复了窦性心律,其中 56.7%(30 例中的 17 例)的患者在服用 5 微克/公斤的剂量后恢复了窦性心律。胺碘酮组中有 53.3%(30 人中有 16 人)的患者恢复了 SR(p<0.001)。雷复隆组心律失常转换的中位时间为 14 [7;23] 分钟,而胺碘酮组为 150 [82;240] 分钟(p<0.001)。在 60 分钟内,雷复隆组的 26 名患者恢复了 SR,而胺碘酮组仅有 4 名患者恢复了 SR(p<0.001)。两组患者在主要心脏不良事件、缓慢性心律失常、血压降低和 QT 延长的发生率方面没有统计学差异。与胺碘酮相比,雷复隆在随机试验中显示出更高的房颤/AFL成功转换率和更短的SR恢复时间。大多数患者在服用最低剂量的雷复隆之后就恢复了SR,这确保了心脏转复的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信