The Attitudes of the South Caucasus Countries Towards the Full-Scale Russian Aggression Against Ukraine

J. Kardaś
{"title":"The Attitudes of the South Caucasus Countries Towards the Full-Scale Russian Aggression Against Ukraine","authors":"J. Kardaś","doi":"10.14746/ps.2023.1.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article not only seeks to answer the question of how the South Caucasus countries reacted to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, but also to outline how international relations in the South Caucasus are currently evolving and identify the main foreign policy objectives of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. A research hypothesis was developed for the purpose of this article, which assumes that none of the South Caucasus countries are currently viable allies of the United States and the European Union in the region anymore, because following the Russian Federation’s aggression against Ukraine, neither Armenia, Azerbaijan nor Georgia have decided to take measures that would strike directly at Russian interests and also align with Western policy. In verifying the research hypothesis that was put forward in the Introduction to this text, it should be concluded that it is true. Looking at the actions of all the three South Caucasus countries, none of them has openly supported Ukraine on the political or military level. Nor have any of them joined the sanctions imposed on the aggressor by the West. The article mainly uses the decision-making method, the comparative method and one of the general logical methods, namely analysis.","PeriodicalId":247418,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Strategiczny","volume":"4 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Strategiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2023.1.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article not only seeks to answer the question of how the South Caucasus countries reacted to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, but also to outline how international relations in the South Caucasus are currently evolving and identify the main foreign policy objectives of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. A research hypothesis was developed for the purpose of this article, which assumes that none of the South Caucasus countries are currently viable allies of the United States and the European Union in the region anymore, because following the Russian Federation’s aggression against Ukraine, neither Armenia, Azerbaijan nor Georgia have decided to take measures that would strike directly at Russian interests and also align with Western policy. In verifying the research hypothesis that was put forward in the Introduction to this text, it should be concluded that it is true. Looking at the actions of all the three South Caucasus countries, none of them has openly supported Ukraine on the political or military level. Nor have any of them joined the sanctions imposed on the aggressor by the West. The article mainly uses the decision-making method, the comparative method and one of the general logical methods, namely analysis.
南高加索国家对俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰的态度
本文不仅要回答南高加索国家如何应对俄罗斯对乌克兰的侵略这一问题,还要概述南高加索地区的国际关系目前正在如何演变,并确定亚美尼亚、阿塞拜疆和格鲁吉亚的主要外交政策目标。本文提出了一个研究假设,假定南高加索各国目前都不再是美国和欧盟在该地区可行的盟友,因为在俄罗斯联邦侵略乌克兰之后,亚美尼亚、阿塞拜疆和格鲁吉亚都没有决定采取直接打击俄罗斯利益并与西方政策保持一致的措施。在验证本文导言中提出的研究假设时,我们应该得出结论,这一假设是正确的。纵观南高加索三国的行动,没有一个国家在政治或军事层面上公开支持乌克兰。也没有任何一个国家加入西方对侵略者的制裁。文章主要采用了决策法、比较法和一般逻辑方法之一,即分析法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信