Why do firms adopt employee ownership? An industry perspective

Phela Townsend, Douglas Kruse, Joseph Blasi
{"title":"Why do firms adopt employee ownership? An industry perspective","authors":"Phela Townsend, Douglas Kruse, Joseph Blasi","doi":"10.1108/jpeo-03-2022-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper offers a new perspective on the potential motivation for the adoption of employee ownership based on market power. Employee ownership may be linked to market power, either through contributing to firm growth that leads to market power or through industry leaders adopting employee ownership as part of rent sharing or a broader consolidation of market position. Both employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) coverage and product market concentration (PMC) have been increasing in the past two decades, providing a good opportunity to see if and how these are related.Design/methodology/approachThe authors predict ESOP adoption and termination using multilevel regressions based on 2002–2012 firm- and industry-level data from the Census Bureau, Compustat and Form 5500 pension datasets.FindingsThe authors find that the top four firms in concentrated industries are more likely to adopt Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs), while having an ESOP does not predict entering the top four, apart from firm-level predictors. Tests indicate the first result does not reflect simple rent sharing with employees but instead appears to reflect an effort by firms to consolidate market power through the attraction and retention (or “locking in”) of industry talent. Other positive predictors of ESOPs include company size, being in a high-wage industry and having a defined benefit (DB) pension.Research limitations/implicationsTo better distinguish among hypotheses, it would be helpful to have firm-level data on managerial attitudes, strategies, networks and monopsony measures. Therefore, future research using such data would be highly useful and encouraged.Practical implicationsThe paper includes implications for the potential usefulness of ESOPs in attracting and retaining talent and for the design of nuanced policy to encourage more broadly based sharing of economic rewards.Originality/valueWhile prior research focuses on firm-level predictors of employee ownership, this study uses market concentration and other industry-level variables to predict the use of ESOPs. This study makes a unique contribution, broadening the current thinking on firm motives and environmental conditions predictive of firm ESOP adoption.","PeriodicalId":354541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership","volume":"111 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpeo-03-2022-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper offers a new perspective on the potential motivation for the adoption of employee ownership based on market power. Employee ownership may be linked to market power, either through contributing to firm growth that leads to market power or through industry leaders adopting employee ownership as part of rent sharing or a broader consolidation of market position. Both employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) coverage and product market concentration (PMC) have been increasing in the past two decades, providing a good opportunity to see if and how these are related.Design/methodology/approachThe authors predict ESOP adoption and termination using multilevel regressions based on 2002–2012 firm- and industry-level data from the Census Bureau, Compustat and Form 5500 pension datasets.FindingsThe authors find that the top four firms in concentrated industries are more likely to adopt Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs), while having an ESOP does not predict entering the top four, apart from firm-level predictors. Tests indicate the first result does not reflect simple rent sharing with employees but instead appears to reflect an effort by firms to consolidate market power through the attraction and retention (or “locking in”) of industry talent. Other positive predictors of ESOPs include company size, being in a high-wage industry and having a defined benefit (DB) pension.Research limitations/implicationsTo better distinguish among hypotheses, it would be helpful to have firm-level data on managerial attitudes, strategies, networks and monopsony measures. Therefore, future research using such data would be highly useful and encouraged.Practical implicationsThe paper includes implications for the potential usefulness of ESOPs in attracting and retaining talent and for the design of nuanced policy to encourage more broadly based sharing of economic rewards.Originality/valueWhile prior research focuses on firm-level predictors of employee ownership, this study uses market concentration and other industry-level variables to predict the use of ESOPs. This study makes a unique contribution, broadening the current thinking on firm motives and environmental conditions predictive of firm ESOP adoption.
企业为何采用员工所有权?行业视角
本文从一个新的角度探讨了基于市场力量的员工持股的潜在动机。员工持股可能与市场支配力有关,这可能是由于员工持股促进了企业增长,从而形成了市场支配力,也可能是由于行业领导者将员工持股作为租金分享或更广泛的市场地位巩固的一部分。在过去二十年中,员工持股计划(ESOP)的覆盖率和产品市场集中度(PMC)都在不断提高,这为我们提供了一个很好的机会来了解这两者之间是否存在关联以及如何关联。作者根据人口普查局、Compustat 和 5500 表养老金数据集提供的 2002-2012 年企业和行业级数据,采用多层次回归法预测了 ESOP 的采用和终止情况。研究结果作者发现,集中行业的前四家公司更有可能采用员工持股计划(ESOP),而除了公司层面的预测因素外,拥有 ESOP 并不能预测进入前四家公司的可能性。测试表明,第一个结果并不反映简单的与员工分享租金,而似乎反映了企业通过吸引和保留(或 "锁定")行业人才来巩固市场力量的努力。ESOP 的其他积极预测因素包括公司规模、所处行业工资较高以及拥有固定福利(DB)养老金。本文对 ESOP 在吸引和留住人才方面的潜在作用,以及设计细致入微的政策以鼓励更广泛地分享经济回报具有重要意义。原创性/价值之前的研究主要关注企业层面的员工所有权预测因素,而本研究则利用市场集中度和其他行业层面的变量来预测 ESOP 的使用情况。这项研究做出了独特的贡献,拓宽了当前对企业采用 ESOP 的企业动机和环境条件的预测思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信