Randomized controlled trial of lactulose and lactulose with probiotic in the treatment of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease

D. Peeyush, Bickram Pradhan
{"title":"Randomized controlled trial of lactulose and lactulose with probiotic in the treatment of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease","authors":"D. Peeyush, Bickram Pradhan","doi":"10.62065/bjhs464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy (MHE) has impact on future clinical outcomes, such as occurrence of overt hepatic encephalopathy, quality of life and survival.\nObjectives: To compare lactulose and lactulose with probiotic in treatment of MHE in chronic liver disease and to determine Prevalence of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with chronic liver disease. \nMethodology: This was stratified randomized controlled trial. A total of 62 patients with MHE were analyzed. Child-Pugh Score was used to stratify the patients into three blocks of Child-Pugh Class (CPC) i.e., CPC-A, B and C. Patient in each block were randomized into two groups (lactulose alone and lactulose with probiotic). The primary end point was to evaluate cognitive status after one month of treatment with Figure Connection Test (FCT) A and B scores in comparison to the baseline. The secondary end points were to estimate the prevalence of MHE in chronic liver disease and assess association of inflammatory markers, total leucocyte count (TLC) and MHE. \nResults: The prevalence of MHE was 41.33%. There was improvement in FCT A and B in 90% of patients in both the groups of CPC-A. Lactulose improved FCT A and B in 45.45% and 40% while lactulose with probiotic improved it in 54.54% and 30% in CPC-B and C respectively. Patients with higher baseline values had less improvement in FCT A and FCT B. Those who didn’t improve had higher TLC in all the groups.\nConclusion: There was no difference in cognitive status between lactulose alone and lactulose with probiotic in treatment for chronic liver disease patients with MHE. High baseline FCT scores and TLC had poor recovery.","PeriodicalId":31640,"journal":{"name":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62065/bjhs464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy (MHE) has impact on future clinical outcomes, such as occurrence of overt hepatic encephalopathy, quality of life and survival. Objectives: To compare lactulose and lactulose with probiotic in treatment of MHE in chronic liver disease and to determine Prevalence of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with chronic liver disease. Methodology: This was stratified randomized controlled trial. A total of 62 patients with MHE were analyzed. Child-Pugh Score was used to stratify the patients into three blocks of Child-Pugh Class (CPC) i.e., CPC-A, B and C. Patient in each block were randomized into two groups (lactulose alone and lactulose with probiotic). The primary end point was to evaluate cognitive status after one month of treatment with Figure Connection Test (FCT) A and B scores in comparison to the baseline. The secondary end points were to estimate the prevalence of MHE in chronic liver disease and assess association of inflammatory markers, total leucocyte count (TLC) and MHE. Results: The prevalence of MHE was 41.33%. There was improvement in FCT A and B in 90% of patients in both the groups of CPC-A. Lactulose improved FCT A and B in 45.45% and 40% while lactulose with probiotic improved it in 54.54% and 30% in CPC-B and C respectively. Patients with higher baseline values had less improvement in FCT A and FCT B. Those who didn’t improve had higher TLC in all the groups. Conclusion: There was no difference in cognitive status between lactulose alone and lactulose with probiotic in treatment for chronic liver disease patients with MHE. High baseline FCT scores and TLC had poor recovery.
乳果糖和乳果糖加益生菌治疗慢性肝病轻微肝性脑病的随机对照试验
导言轻微肝性脑病(MHE)对未来的临床结果有影响,如明显肝性脑病的发生、生活质量和存活率:比较乳果糖和乳果糖加益生菌治疗慢性肝病 MHE 的疗效,并确定慢性肝病患者轻度肝性脑病的患病率。研究方法:这是一项分层随机对照试验。共分析了 62 名 MHE 患者。采用Child-Pugh评分将患者分为三个Child-Pugh分级(CPC)组,即CPC-A、B和C。主要终点是评估治疗一个月后的认知状况,即图连接测试(FCT)A 和 B 分数与基线的比较。次要终点是估算慢性肝病中MHE的患病率,并评估炎症标志物、白细胞总数(TLC)与MHE的关联。研究结果MHE发病率为41.33%。在 CPC-A 两组中,90% 的患者 FCT A 和 B 均有所改善。乳果糖对 FCT A 和 B 的改善率分别为 45.45% 和 40%,而乳果糖加益生菌对 CPC-B 和 C 的改善率分别为 54.54% 和 30%。基线值较高的患者在 FCT A 和 FCT B 中的改善程度较低:结论:在治疗患有 MHE 的慢性肝病患者时,单纯使用乳果糖和乳果糖联合益生菌在认知状况上没有差异。基线FCT评分和TLC较高的患者恢复情况较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信