Cognitive load scale in learning formal definition of limit: A rasch model approach

R. Oktaviyanthi, R. Agus, Mark Lester B. Garcia, Kornkanok Lertdechapat
{"title":"Cognitive load scale in learning formal definition of limit: A rasch model approach","authors":"R. Oktaviyanthi, R. Agus, Mark Lester B. Garcia, Kornkanok Lertdechapat","doi":"10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p99-118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constructing proofs for the limit using the formal definition induces a high cognitive load. Common assessment tools, like cognitive load scales, lack specificity for the concept of limits. This research aims to validate an instrument tailored to assess cognitive load in students focused on the formal definition of limits, addressing the need for diverse strategies in education. The research employs a quantitative survey design with a Rasch model approach, utilizing a data collection instrument in the form of a questionnaire. Subsequently, the data are analyzed by focusing on three aspects: (1) item fit to the Rasch model, (2) unidimensionality, and (3) rating scale. A total of 315 students from three private universities in Banten participated as research respondents. The findings of this study affirm the validity of the cognitive load scale centered on the formal definition of limit, meeting the stringent standards set by Rasch modeling. Additionally, the results of the study provide evidence of the scale’s adherence to the monotonic principle of the Rasch model. These outcomes contribute to a comprehensive understanding of cognitive load in the context of learning formal definition of limit, providing a solid foundation for instructional design and assessment strategies.","PeriodicalId":109878,"journal":{"name":"Infinity Journal","volume":"42 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infinity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p99-118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Constructing proofs for the limit using the formal definition induces a high cognitive load. Common assessment tools, like cognitive load scales, lack specificity for the concept of limits. This research aims to validate an instrument tailored to assess cognitive load in students focused on the formal definition of limits, addressing the need for diverse strategies in education. The research employs a quantitative survey design with a Rasch model approach, utilizing a data collection instrument in the form of a questionnaire. Subsequently, the data are analyzed by focusing on three aspects: (1) item fit to the Rasch model, (2) unidimensionality, and (3) rating scale. A total of 315 students from three private universities in Banten participated as research respondents. The findings of this study affirm the validity of the cognitive load scale centered on the formal definition of limit, meeting the stringent standards set by Rasch modeling. Additionally, the results of the study provide evidence of the scale’s adherence to the monotonic principle of the Rasch model. These outcomes contribute to a comprehensive understanding of cognitive load in the context of learning formal definition of limit, providing a solid foundation for instructional design and assessment strategies.
学习极限正式定义时的认知负荷量表:拉氏模型方法
使用正式定义来构建极限证明会产生很高的认知负荷。常见的评估工具,如认知负荷量表,对极限概念缺乏特异性。本研究旨在验证一种专门用于评估学生认知负荷的工具,该工具侧重于极限的形式定义,以满足教育中对多样化策略的需求。本研究采用定量调查设计和 Rasch 模型方法,使用问卷形式的数据收集工具。随后,从三个方面对数据进行了分析:(1) 项目与 Rasch 模型的契合度;(2) 单维性;(3) 评级量表。共有 315 名来自万丹州三所私立大学的学生作为研究对象参与了调查。研究结果肯定了认知负荷量表以极限的正式定义为中心的有效性,符合 Rasch 模型设定的严格标准。此外,研究结果还证明该量表符合 Rasch 模型的单调性原则。这些成果有助于全面了解认知负荷在学习形式极限定义中的作用,为教学设计和评估策略奠定了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信