CAT (Comprehensive Assessment Tool) for Assessment of Functional Capacity of the Hand

Shilpshree Palsule, Jayashri Kale
{"title":"CAT (Comprehensive Assessment Tool) for Assessment of Functional Capacity of the Hand","authors":"Shilpshree Palsule, Jayashri Kale","doi":"10.52403/ijshr.20240103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hand function evaluations form an important element of extremity assessment, which helps to define the patient’s problem. Many functional hand evaluations described in the literature. However, cultural differences, expenses incurred, non-availability of Indian normative data makes clinical application of these tests difficult in Indian scenario.\nAn attempt is made in the said study to construct an inexpensive, culture based, easy to administer, hand function test, which can be used for evaluation of the functioning of the upper extremity, for daily living tasks. Hence, the formulation of CAT (Comprehensive assessment tool) for evaluation of hand function.\nObjectives: To construct a simple, but comprehensive test for assessment of hand function. (CAT for hand function evaluation)\n2. To check the reliability of the CAT test.\nMaterials and methods: CAT test proforma was prepared based on available literature. The test that was constructed, consisted of 14 unilateral and 16 bilateral items. The study was conducted in the Occupational therapy department of a tertiary care hospital. Inclusion criteria were Normal, healthy individuals, between 20-60 years of age, with no known musculoskeletal upper extremity problems were recruited for the study. Total 30 people were evaluated on the newly constructed test and retested after a period of 3 weeks on the 30 test items after obtaining written informed consent. Standard method was employed while performance of the test. Scoring was done in time in seconds, and performance on CAT results noted.\nResults: Cronbach’s alpha values ranged from .798 to .976 suggesting excellent test-retest reliability for most test items. For bilateral test items, Cronbach’s alpha ranged from .573 to .941 suggesting from fair for some items and excellent test-retest reliability for most test items.\nConclusion: The above findings suggest that the results of the CAT test are reproducible, hence CAT is a reliable test.\n\nKeywords: CAT test, Comprehensive test, Functional hand evaluation, Hand function","PeriodicalId":14300,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research","volume":"58 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20240103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hand function evaluations form an important element of extremity assessment, which helps to define the patient’s problem. Many functional hand evaluations described in the literature. However, cultural differences, expenses incurred, non-availability of Indian normative data makes clinical application of these tests difficult in Indian scenario. An attempt is made in the said study to construct an inexpensive, culture based, easy to administer, hand function test, which can be used for evaluation of the functioning of the upper extremity, for daily living tasks. Hence, the formulation of CAT (Comprehensive assessment tool) for evaluation of hand function. Objectives: To construct a simple, but comprehensive test for assessment of hand function. (CAT for hand function evaluation) 2. To check the reliability of the CAT test. Materials and methods: CAT test proforma was prepared based on available literature. The test that was constructed, consisted of 14 unilateral and 16 bilateral items. The study was conducted in the Occupational therapy department of a tertiary care hospital. Inclusion criteria were Normal, healthy individuals, between 20-60 years of age, with no known musculoskeletal upper extremity problems were recruited for the study. Total 30 people were evaluated on the newly constructed test and retested after a period of 3 weeks on the 30 test items after obtaining written informed consent. Standard method was employed while performance of the test. Scoring was done in time in seconds, and performance on CAT results noted. Results: Cronbach’s alpha values ranged from .798 to .976 suggesting excellent test-retest reliability for most test items. For bilateral test items, Cronbach’s alpha ranged from .573 to .941 suggesting from fair for some items and excellent test-retest reliability for most test items. Conclusion: The above findings suggest that the results of the CAT test are reproducible, hence CAT is a reliable test. Keywords: CAT test, Comprehensive test, Functional hand evaluation, Hand function
用于评估手部功能能力的 CAT(综合评估工具
背景:手部功能评估是四肢评估的重要组成部分,有助于确定患者的问题。文献中描述了许多手部功能评估方法。本研究尝试构建一种成本低廉、基于文化、易于管理的手部功能测试,可用于评估日常生活任务中的上肢功能。因此,制定了用于评估手部功能的 CAT(综合评估工具):构建一个简单但全面的手部功能测试。(2. 检验 CAT 测试的可靠性:根据现有文献编制 CAT 测试表。构建的测试包括 14 个单侧项目和 16 个双侧项目。研究在一家三甲医院的职业治疗科进行。纳入标准是年龄在 20-60 岁之间、没有已知上肢肌肉骨骼问题的正常健康人。共有 30 人接受了新设计的测试评估,并在获得书面知情同意后,在 3 周后对 30 个测试项目进行了复测。测试采用标准方法。评分以秒为单位,并记录 CAT 的成绩:结果:Cronbach's alpha 值介于 0.798 至 0.976 之间,表明大多数测试项目的重复测试可靠性极佳。对于双边测试项目,Cronbach's alpha 值介于 0.573 至 0.941 之间,表明某些项目的可靠性尚可,而大多数测试项目的重复测试可靠性极佳:上述结果表明,CAT 测试的结果是可重复的,因此 CAT 是一种可靠的测试:CAT测试 综合测试 手功能评估 手功能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信