A Question of Age? Applying Desistance With Children

Alexandra Wigzell, Tim Bateman
{"title":"A Question of Age? Applying Desistance With Children","authors":"Alexandra Wigzell, Tim Bateman","doi":"10.1177/14732254231223704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Youth justice in England and Wales has seen the increasing adoption of desistance thinking in recent years. There has been scarce academic debate of this development, despite the desistance evidence base focussing on adult pathways away from crime. This article examines the theorisation and application of desistance thinking with children, centring on the experiences and narratives of four ‘groups’ involved in the formal youth justice system in England and Wales, across two empirical studies. It challenges previous scholarship that denies the relevance of desistance theories to under-18s, arguing for progressive desistance practice that prioritises children’s healthy long-term development.","PeriodicalId":513128,"journal":{"name":"Youth Justice","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Youth Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14732254231223704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Youth justice in England and Wales has seen the increasing adoption of desistance thinking in recent years. There has been scarce academic debate of this development, despite the desistance evidence base focussing on adult pathways away from crime. This article examines the theorisation and application of desistance thinking with children, centring on the experiences and narratives of four ‘groups’ involved in the formal youth justice system in England and Wales, across two empirical studies. It challenges previous scholarship that denies the relevance of desistance theories to under-18s, arguing for progressive desistance practice that prioritises children’s healthy long-term development.
年龄问题?对儿童实施抵制
近年来,英格兰和威尔士的青少年司法越来越多地采用了 "不抵抗 "思想。尽管 "摆脱 "的证据基础主要集中在成年人摆脱犯罪的途径上,但关于这一发展的学术讨论却很少。本文通过两项实证研究,以英格兰和威尔士正式青少年司法系统中的四个 "群体 "的经历和叙述为中心,探讨了在儿童中理论化和应用 "不抵抗 "思想的问题。文章挑战了以往否认 "不抵抗 "理论与 18 岁以下青少年相关的学术研究,主张采用渐进式的 "不抵抗 "实践,优先考虑儿童的长期健康发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信