Effectiveness of corticosteroid injection vs platelet rich plasma (PRP) injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis

Santosh Nepal, Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Rajan Panthee, Gokul Kafle, Raj Kumar Sah
{"title":"Effectiveness of corticosteroid injection vs platelet rich plasma (PRP) injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis","authors":"Santosh Nepal, Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Rajan Panthee, Gokul Kafle, Raj Kumar Sah","doi":"10.62065/bjhs465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common causes for inferior heel pain in adults. Many noninvasive and invasive treatment modalities are available for its treatment. Local injection of corticosteroid and Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is usually used in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis not responding to noninvasive conservative treatments.\nObjectives: To compare the efficacy of local injection of corticosteroids and platelet rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.\nMethodology: Patients diagnosed as plantar fasciitis and treated conservatively for at least 3 months and had no response to conservative treatment modalities were involved in this study and randomly allocated into 2 groups of 38 each (Group A and Group B). Patients were treated with local corticosteroid injection in group A and autologous PRP injection in group B. Clinical assessment was done prior to the injection and at 3 weeks and 3 months following the injection, which included visual analog pain scale (VAS), subjective rating using the modified Roles and Maudsley score (MRMS), functional outcome score by the Foot function Index (FFI).\nResults: The mean age, sex and body mass index was comparable for both groups. Postinjection, there was significant improvement (p < 0.05) of visual analog score (VAS), modified Roles and Maudsley score (MRMS), Foot Function Index in both the groups. However, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in improvement of VAS, MRMS and FFI when compared between the 2 groups. \nConclusion: This study revealed that the treatment of plantar fasciitis with steroid or PRP injection was equally effective in patients who do not respond to conservative treatment.","PeriodicalId":31640,"journal":{"name":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"53 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62065/bjhs465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common causes for inferior heel pain in adults. Many noninvasive and invasive treatment modalities are available for its treatment. Local injection of corticosteroid and Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is usually used in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis not responding to noninvasive conservative treatments. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of local injection of corticosteroids and platelet rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Methodology: Patients diagnosed as plantar fasciitis and treated conservatively for at least 3 months and had no response to conservative treatment modalities were involved in this study and randomly allocated into 2 groups of 38 each (Group A and Group B). Patients were treated with local corticosteroid injection in group A and autologous PRP injection in group B. Clinical assessment was done prior to the injection and at 3 weeks and 3 months following the injection, which included visual analog pain scale (VAS), subjective rating using the modified Roles and Maudsley score (MRMS), functional outcome score by the Foot function Index (FFI). Results: The mean age, sex and body mass index was comparable for both groups. Postinjection, there was significant improvement (p < 0.05) of visual analog score (VAS), modified Roles and Maudsley score (MRMS), Foot Function Index in both the groups. However, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in improvement of VAS, MRMS and FFI when compared between the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study revealed that the treatment of plantar fasciitis with steroid or PRP injection was equally effective in patients who do not respond to conservative treatment.
注射皮质类固醇与注射富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗足底筋膜炎的效果对比
简介足底筋膜炎是导致成人足跟下部疼痛的最常见原因之一。目前有许多非侵入性和侵入性的治疗方法。局部注射皮质类固醇和富血小板血浆(PRP)通常用于治疗非侵入性保守治疗无效的慢性足底筋膜炎:比较局部注射皮质类固醇和富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效:被诊断为足底筋膜炎并接受保守治疗至少 3 个月且对保守治疗方法无反应的患者参与本研究,并随机分为两组,每组 38 人(A 组和 B 组)。A 组患者接受局部皮质类固醇注射治疗,B 组患者接受自体 PRP 注射治疗。注射前、注射后 3 周和 3 个月进行临床评估,包括视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)、改良 Roles and Maudsley 评分(MRMS)主观评分、足部功能指数(FFI)功能结果评分:结果:两组患者的平均年龄、性别和体重指数相当。注射后,两组患者的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、改良罗尔斯和莫德斯利评分(MRMS)、足部功能指数均有明显改善(P < 0.05)。不过,两组患者的视觉模拟评分、改良罗尔斯和莫兹利评分以及足部功能指数的改善情况没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。结论本研究表明,对于保守治疗无效的足底筋膜炎患者,类固醇或 PRP 注射治疗同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信