N. S. Patil, Animesh Ranjan, Gaurav, Amandeep Singh
{"title":"The Current Regulatory Environment for Software Used in Medical Devices: A Need for Refined International Strategies","authors":"N. S. Patil, Animesh Ranjan, Gaurav, Amandeep Singh","doi":"10.2174/0126673371279532240102113651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nIn the fast-evolving landscape of healthcare technology, Software as a Medical Device\n(SaMD) has emerged as a transformative force, redefining how medical functionalities are delivered\nand accessed. From diagnostic algorithms to treatment monitoring applications, SaMD\nhas ushered in a new era of innovation and patient care[1]. As this field continues to burgeon,\nregulatory frameworks play a pivotal role in ensuring the safety, efficacy, and reliability of these\ndigital health solutions[2]. In this editorial, we delve into the dynamic regulatory landscape\nof SaMD in both the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) nations and the United States (US), exploring the\nnuances and challenges that underscore the need for more refined strategies. By examining the regulatory intricacies and aligning\nthem with technological advancements, we aim to shed light on the imperative of adaptive regulatory approaches that can\nharness the full potential of SaMD while safeguarding public health. A remarkable role of \"software as a medical device\"\n(SaMD) in contemporary healthcare software that is intended to be used for medical purposes but is not a component of a\nhardware medical device is referred to as \"software as a medical device\" (SaMD)[3]. SaMD is essential to contemporary\nhealthcare since it makes it possible to use software applications for a variety of medical functions, diagnoses, treatments, and\nmonitoring [4].\n","PeriodicalId":72255,"journal":{"name":"Applied drug research, clinical trials and regulatory affairs","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied drug research, clinical trials and regulatory affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126673371279532240102113651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the fast-evolving landscape of healthcare technology, Software as a Medical Device
(SaMD) has emerged as a transformative force, redefining how medical functionalities are delivered
and accessed. From diagnostic algorithms to treatment monitoring applications, SaMD
has ushered in a new era of innovation and patient care[1]. As this field continues to burgeon,
regulatory frameworks play a pivotal role in ensuring the safety, efficacy, and reliability of these
digital health solutions[2]. In this editorial, we delve into the dynamic regulatory landscape
of SaMD in both the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) nations and the United States (US), exploring the
nuances and challenges that underscore the need for more refined strategies. By examining the regulatory intricacies and aligning
them with technological advancements, we aim to shed light on the imperative of adaptive regulatory approaches that can
harness the full potential of SaMD while safeguarding public health. A remarkable role of "software as a medical device"
(SaMD) in contemporary healthcare software that is intended to be used for medical purposes but is not a component of a
hardware medical device is referred to as "software as a medical device" (SaMD)[3]. SaMD is essential to contemporary
healthcare since it makes it possible to use software applications for a variety of medical functions, diagnoses, treatments, and
monitoring [4].