Mate preference dissimilarity predicts friendship attraction at zero-acquaintance for men, not women

Kelly Campbell, Benjamin R. Meagher, Cari D. Goetz, Nuttacha Vaitayavijit
{"title":"Mate preference dissimilarity predicts friendship attraction at zero-acquaintance for men, not women","authors":"Kelly Campbell, Benjamin R. Meagher, Cari D. Goetz, Nuttacha Vaitayavijit","doi":"10.1177/02654075241230457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We hypothesized that dissimilar mate preferences would augment friendship attraction in zero-acquaintance interactions whereas similar mate preferences would hinder friendship attraction. Heterosexual participants completed an online survey to assess their mate preferences. They also rated the attractiveness of opposite-sex photos. Next, they attended a 3-hr speed-friending session in which they interacted with same-sex others for 3-min each. After each interaction, they completed a 2-min assessment about the person they just met. Two sessions were held, one for women ( N = 20) and one for men ( N = 18). The social relations model was used to regress unique feelings of friendship attraction on similarity in terms of mate preferences while controlling for perceiver and target variance. Our hypothesis was supported among men: Interactions in which two people differed in mate preferences were rated more positively than those in which participants had similar mate preferences. These results are consistent with Parental Investment Theory and highlight the importance of mate preferences in friendship attraction among men.","PeriodicalId":508458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241230457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We hypothesized that dissimilar mate preferences would augment friendship attraction in zero-acquaintance interactions whereas similar mate preferences would hinder friendship attraction. Heterosexual participants completed an online survey to assess their mate preferences. They also rated the attractiveness of opposite-sex photos. Next, they attended a 3-hr speed-friending session in which they interacted with same-sex others for 3-min each. After each interaction, they completed a 2-min assessment about the person they just met. Two sessions were held, one for women ( N = 20) and one for men ( N = 18). The social relations model was used to regress unique feelings of friendship attraction on similarity in terms of mate preferences while controlling for perceiver and target variance. Our hypothesis was supported among men: Interactions in which two people differed in mate preferences were rated more positively than those in which participants had similar mate preferences. These results are consistent with Parental Investment Theory and highlight the importance of mate preferences in friendship attraction among men.
配偶偏好差异能预测男性在零距离接触时的友谊吸引力,而不是女性
我们假设,在零熟人互动中,不同的配偶偏好会增强友谊吸引力,而相似的配偶偏好则会阻碍友谊吸引力。异性恋参与者完成了一项在线调查,以评估他们的配偶偏好。他们还对异性照片的吸引力进行了评分。接下来,他们参加了一个 3 小时的快速交友环节,在这个环节中,他们与同性交往,每次 3 分钟。每次互动后,他们都要完成 2 分钟的关于刚认识的人的评估。共进行了两节课,一节针对女性(20 人),一节针对男性(18 人)。在控制感知者和目标差异的情况下,我们使用社会关系模型对友谊吸引的独特感受与配偶偏好的相似性进行回归。我们的假设在男性中得到了支持:在两人配偶偏好不同的互动中,被试的积极评价要高于配偶偏好相似的互动。这些结果与 "父母投资理论"(Parental Investment Theory)一致,并强调了配偶偏好在男性友谊吸引中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信