The European Investor State: Its characteristics, genesis, and effects

Ulrike Lepont, Matthias Thiemann
{"title":"The European Investor State: Its characteristics, genesis, and effects","authors":"Ulrike Lepont, Matthias Thiemann","doi":"10.1177/10245294231215481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of financial, sovereign debt and health crises, public interventions in the European economy have taken on a new level of breadth, marking a reentry in force of the state in economic life that goes beyond the regulatory state. Yet, these interventions do not follow the old Keynesian interventions neither, being shaped through a particular logic of investment that link public and private actors in a particular configuration. The introduction to this special issue lays out this configuration for the case of the EU and its Member States through the concept of “European Investor state.” By this concept, we refer to the redefinition of the role of European states in the economy as an “investor,” in reference to private investment funds, which the state seeks both to imitate and to enroll. The paper embeds this redefinition of state intervention in the context of the 2010s in Europe, characterized by worries about “secular stagnation” and growing concern about an “investment gap,” interpreted as the failure of financial markets to invest in productive sectors, especially when risky. The budgetary constraints and the ideological outlook then shaped the specific financial and off-balanced sheet tools of the investor state. Finally, the paper explores the implications of the Covid-crisis on this intervention model. It concludes that despite major changes in fiscal policy at the EU level, this approach is likely to persist, because of the lasting interpretation in terms of “investment gap,” which only public-private collaborations are seen to be able to fill.","PeriodicalId":207354,"journal":{"name":"Competition & Change","volume":"48 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition & Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294231215481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the wake of financial, sovereign debt and health crises, public interventions in the European economy have taken on a new level of breadth, marking a reentry in force of the state in economic life that goes beyond the regulatory state. Yet, these interventions do not follow the old Keynesian interventions neither, being shaped through a particular logic of investment that link public and private actors in a particular configuration. The introduction to this special issue lays out this configuration for the case of the EU and its Member States through the concept of “European Investor state.” By this concept, we refer to the redefinition of the role of European states in the economy as an “investor,” in reference to private investment funds, which the state seeks both to imitate and to enroll. The paper embeds this redefinition of state intervention in the context of the 2010s in Europe, characterized by worries about “secular stagnation” and growing concern about an “investment gap,” interpreted as the failure of financial markets to invest in productive sectors, especially when risky. The budgetary constraints and the ideological outlook then shaped the specific financial and off-balanced sheet tools of the investor state. Finally, the paper explores the implications of the Covid-crisis on this intervention model. It concludes that despite major changes in fiscal policy at the EU level, this approach is likely to persist, because of the lasting interpretation in terms of “investment gap,” which only public-private collaborations are seen to be able to fill.
欧洲投资国:其特点、起源和影响
在金融危机、主权债务危机和健康危机之后,对欧洲经济的公共干预达到了一个新的高度,标志着国家在经济生活中重新发挥了超越监管国家的作用。然而,这些干预措施并没有沿袭凯恩斯主义的旧有干预方式,而是通过一种特殊的投资逻辑将公共和私人行为者联系在一起。本特刊的导言通过 "欧洲投资国 "的概念为欧盟及其成员国阐述了这种配置。通过这一概念,我们将欧洲国家在经济中的角色重新定义为 "投资者",指的是私人投资基金,国家既要模仿私人投资基金,又要吸收私人投资基金。本文将这种对国家干预的重新定义置于 2010 年代的欧洲背景下,当时欧洲对 "世俗停滞 "感到担忧,对 "投资缺口 "的担忧与日俱增,"投资缺口 "被解释为金融市场未能投资于生产部门,尤其是在风险较大的情况下。预算限制和意识形态前景塑造了投资国的具体金融和资产负债表工具。最后,本文探讨了科维德危机对这一干预模式的影响。本文的结论是,尽管欧盟层面的财政政策发生了重大变化,但这种方法很可能会持续下去,因为 "投资缺口 "被长期解释为只有公私合作才能填补的缺口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信