$\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy Linear Programming for $\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy Target Coverage Problems

K. Osawaru, O. O. Olowu
{"title":"$\\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy Linear Programming for $\\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy Target Coverage Problems","authors":"K. Osawaru, O. O. Olowu","doi":"10.34198/ejms.14224.317331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimal set covering problems are commonplace in communication, remote sensing, logistics, image processing, and network fields [3]. Thus, studies on determining optimal covering sets (sensors) of points (targets) in a region have emerged recently. One characteristic of these studies is the consideration of cases where a target is considered fully covered when it falls within a coverage area (\"Boolean\" coverage). Consequently, optimality solutions/methods/algorithms founded on this coverage scheme are usually too restrictive and (or) precise and so are not suitable for many complex and real life situations, which are most times plagued with ambiguity, vagueness, imprecision and approximate membership of points and (or) covering sets.\n\nFuzzy structures have proven to be suitable for the representation and analysis of such complex systems with many successful applications. Although fuzzy sets generalizes a set, a more recent generalization for both and its related concepts is the Relative fuzzy set [1] which gives a dynamic fuzzy representation to sets. $\\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy fixed points results of $\\mathbb{T}-$Relative fuzzy maps were studied in [5] and recently, the concept of $\\mathbb{T}-$Relative fuzzy linear programming [6] was introduced as a generalization of fuzzy linear programming. The results were applied to generalize the Boolean set based covering problems in literature to a $\\mathbb{T}-$Relative fuzzy Boolean coverage one. Although, Shan et al. in [15] and others [16] - [21] have given a probabilistic coverage consideration but this lacks subjectivity in representing vagueness and imprecision inherent in most systems.\n\nIn this present article the Linear Programming (LP) formulation of “A Computational Physics-based Algorithm for Target Coverage Problems\" by Jordan Barry and Christopher Thron is generalized by considering a fuzzy and relative fuzzy target coverage instead of the crisp set Boolean coverage. Also we introduce the Fuzzy Linear Programming (FLP) and the $\\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy Linear Programming (RFLP) for the set coverage problem which allows for ascertaining dynamic optimality with aspiration levels.","PeriodicalId":482741,"journal":{"name":"Earthline Journal of Mathematical Sciences","volume":"27 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthline Journal of Mathematical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34198/ejms.14224.317331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimal set covering problems are commonplace in communication, remote sensing, logistics, image processing, and network fields [3]. Thus, studies on determining optimal covering sets (sensors) of points (targets) in a region have emerged recently. One characteristic of these studies is the consideration of cases where a target is considered fully covered when it falls within a coverage area ("Boolean" coverage). Consequently, optimality solutions/methods/algorithms founded on this coverage scheme are usually too restrictive and (or) precise and so are not suitable for many complex and real life situations, which are most times plagued with ambiguity, vagueness, imprecision and approximate membership of points and (or) covering sets. Fuzzy structures have proven to be suitable for the representation and analysis of such complex systems with many successful applications. Although fuzzy sets generalizes a set, a more recent generalization for both and its related concepts is the Relative fuzzy set [1] which gives a dynamic fuzzy representation to sets. $\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy fixed points results of $\mathbb{T}-$Relative fuzzy maps were studied in [5] and recently, the concept of $\mathbb{T}-$Relative fuzzy linear programming [6] was introduced as a generalization of fuzzy linear programming. The results were applied to generalize the Boolean set based covering problems in literature to a $\mathbb{T}-$Relative fuzzy Boolean coverage one. Although, Shan et al. in [15] and others [16] - [21] have given a probabilistic coverage consideration but this lacks subjectivity in representing vagueness and imprecision inherent in most systems. In this present article the Linear Programming (LP) formulation of “A Computational Physics-based Algorithm for Target Coverage Problems" by Jordan Barry and Christopher Thron is generalized by considering a fuzzy and relative fuzzy target coverage instead of the crisp set Boolean coverage. Also we introduce the Fuzzy Linear Programming (FLP) and the $\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy Linear Programming (RFLP) for the set coverage problem which allows for ascertaining dynamic optimality with aspiration levels.
$mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy Linear Programming for $\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy Target Coverage Problem ($mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy Linear Programming for $\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy Target Coverage Problem)。
最优集合覆盖问题在通信、遥感、物流、图像处理和网络等领域屡见不鲜 [3]。因此,最近出现了关于确定区域内点(目标)的最优覆盖集(传感器)的研究。这些研究的一个特点是,当目标位于某个覆盖区域内时("布尔 "覆盖),该目标即被视为完全覆盖。因此,建立在这种覆盖方案基础上的最优解/方法/算法通常限制性过强,(或)过于精确,因此并不适合许多复杂的实际情况,因为这些情况大多存在模糊性、含糊性、不精确性以及点和(或)覆盖集的近似成员资格等问题。尽管模糊集是对集合的概括,但对两者及其相关概念的最新概括是相对模糊集[1],它给出了集合的动态模糊表示。$\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy fixed points results of $\mathbb{T}-$Relative fuzzy maps 在 [5] 中被研究,最近,$\mathbb{T}-$Relative fuzzy linear programming [6] 的概念被引入,作为模糊线性规划的一种概括。其结果被应用于将文献中基于布尔集的覆盖问题推广到 $\mathbb{T}-$Relative 模糊布尔覆盖问题。虽然,Shan 等人在 [15] 和其他 [16] - [21] 中给出了概率覆盖的考虑,但这在表示大多数系统固有的模糊性和不精确性方面缺乏主观性。在本文中,Jordan Barry 和 Christopher Thron 的 "基于计算物理的目标覆盖问题算法 "中的线性规划(LP)表述通过考虑模糊和相对模糊目标覆盖而不是简单布尔覆盖得到了推广。此外,我们还为集合覆盖问题引入了模糊线性规划(FLP)和 $\mathbb{T}-$Relative Fuzzy Linear Programming (RFLP),它允许确定具有期望水平的动态最优性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信