Technological sovereignty in Germany: techno-industrial policy as a form of economic statecraft?

Philipp Staab, Dominik Piétron, Marc Pirogan
{"title":"Technological sovereignty in Germany: techno-industrial policy as a form of economic statecraft?","authors":"Philipp Staab, Dominik Piétron, Marc Pirogan","doi":"10.1332/26352257y2023d000000005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological sovereignty has emerged as a prominent topic, with states positioning themselves to ensure security and economic competitiveness. However, German economic policy rarely involved strategic government interventions and industrial policies due to its deep-rooted adherence to ordoliberalism. In response to the influence of foreign big tech companies and growing economic competition from China, the German state is now formulating a strategic techno-industrial policy agenda, advocating interventions for the preservation of sovereignty. This article analyses the proposed agenda using an inductive process-tracing approach (Trampusch and Palier, 2016) and document analysis (Bowen, 2009) of strategy papers, policy documents and selected media reports. Drawing on the concepts of structural power (Strange, 2004 [1988]) and economic statecraft (Weiss and Thurbon, 2021), we argue that Germany’s pursuit of technological sovereignty represents a distinctive form of (geo-)economically motivated statecraft, primarily directed at enhancing commercial competitiveness rather than prioritising security. However, we identify limitations to this approach where the regulatory regime and institutional legacy, both at the national and EU levels, impede strategic government interventions in the economy, thus constraining the pursuit of technological sovereignty.","PeriodicalId":302702,"journal":{"name":"Global Political Economy","volume":"40 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/26352257y2023d000000005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological sovereignty has emerged as a prominent topic, with states positioning themselves to ensure security and economic competitiveness. However, German economic policy rarely involved strategic government interventions and industrial policies due to its deep-rooted adherence to ordoliberalism. In response to the influence of foreign big tech companies and growing economic competition from China, the German state is now formulating a strategic techno-industrial policy agenda, advocating interventions for the preservation of sovereignty. This article analyses the proposed agenda using an inductive process-tracing approach (Trampusch and Palier, 2016) and document analysis (Bowen, 2009) of strategy papers, policy documents and selected media reports. Drawing on the concepts of structural power (Strange, 2004 [1988]) and economic statecraft (Weiss and Thurbon, 2021), we argue that Germany’s pursuit of technological sovereignty represents a distinctive form of (geo-)economically motivated statecraft, primarily directed at enhancing commercial competitiveness rather than prioritising security. However, we identify limitations to this approach where the regulatory regime and institutional legacy, both at the national and EU levels, impede strategic government interventions in the economy, thus constraining the pursuit of technological sovereignty.
德国的技术主权:作为一种经济国策的技术工业政策?
技术主权已成为一个突出的话题,各国都将自身定位为确保安全和经济竞争力。然而,由于德国根深蒂固地奉行秩序自由主义,其经济政策很少涉及政府战略干预和产业政策。为了应对外国大型科技公司的影响和来自中国的日益激烈的经济竞争,德国正在制定一项战略性技术产业政策议程,主张通过干预来维护主权。本文采用归纳过程追踪法(Trampusch 和 Palier,2016 年)以及对战略文件、政策文件和部分媒体报道的文件分析法(Bowen,2009 年)对拟议议程进行了分析。借鉴结构性权力(Strange,2004 [1988])和经济国策(Weiss and Thurbon,2021)的概念,我们认为德国对技术主权的追求代表了一种独特的(地缘)经济动机的国策形式,其主要目的是提高商业竞争力,而不是将安全放在首位。然而,我们也发现了这种方法的局限性,即国家和欧盟层面的监管制度和体制遗产阻碍了政府对经济的战略性干预,从而限制了对技术主权的追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信