Bayesian Estimation of Stress Strength Modeling Using MCMC Method Based on Outliers

Q1 Decision Sciences
Amal S. Hassan, E. A. Elsherpieny, Rokaya E. Mohamed
{"title":"Bayesian Estimation of Stress Strength Modeling Using MCMC Method Based on Outliers","authors":"Amal S. Hassan,&nbsp;E. A. Elsherpieny,&nbsp;Rokaya E. Mohamed","doi":"10.1007/s40745-023-00512-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In reliability literature and engineering applications, stress-strength (SS) models are particularly important. This paper aims to estimate the SS reliability for an inverse Weibull distribution having the same shape parameters but different scale parameters when the strength (<i>X</i>) and stress (<i>Y</i>) random variables are independent. In the presence of outliers and in a homogeneous situation, the maximum likelihood reliability estimator is computed. With independent gamma priors, a Bayesian estimation approach for SS reliability is also proposed. The symmetric and asymmetric loss functions are used to derive the Bayesian estimators of SS reliability. Some sophisticated calculations are carried out using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Simulations are used to investigate the precision of Bayesian and non-Bayesian estimates for SS reliability. Further, a comparative study among the Bayesian estimates in the case of uniform and gamma priors is carried out utilizing a simulation methodology. The provided methodology is ultimately applied to the actual data using the discussed model and data from head-neck cancer. According to the results of a study, larger sample sizes resulted in better reliability estimates for both techniques. Generally, as the number of outliers increased, the precision measures from both methods decreased. In all circumstances, the Bayesian estimates under the precautionary loss function outperformed the observed estimates under alternative loss functions. The actual data analysis assured the theoretical and simulated studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36280,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Data Science","volume":"12 1","pages":"23 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40745-023-00512-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In reliability literature and engineering applications, stress-strength (SS) models are particularly important. This paper aims to estimate the SS reliability for an inverse Weibull distribution having the same shape parameters but different scale parameters when the strength (X) and stress (Y) random variables are independent. In the presence of outliers and in a homogeneous situation, the maximum likelihood reliability estimator is computed. With independent gamma priors, a Bayesian estimation approach for SS reliability is also proposed. The symmetric and asymmetric loss functions are used to derive the Bayesian estimators of SS reliability. Some sophisticated calculations are carried out using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Simulations are used to investigate the precision of Bayesian and non-Bayesian estimates for SS reliability. Further, a comparative study among the Bayesian estimates in the case of uniform and gamma priors is carried out utilizing a simulation methodology. The provided methodology is ultimately applied to the actual data using the discussed model and data from head-neck cancer. According to the results of a study, larger sample sizes resulted in better reliability estimates for both techniques. Generally, as the number of outliers increased, the precision measures from both methods decreased. In all circumstances, the Bayesian estimates under the precautionary loss function outperformed the observed estimates under alternative loss functions. The actual data analysis assured the theoretical and simulated studies.

使用基于离群值的 MCMC 方法对应力强度模型进行贝叶斯估计
在可靠性文献和工程应用中,应力强度(SS)模型尤为重要。本文旨在估计具有相同形状参数但不同尺度参数的逆威布尔分布在强度(X)和应力(Y)随机变量独立时的SS可靠度。在存在异常值和齐次情况下,计算最大似然信度估计量。在独立先验条件下,提出了SS可靠性的贝叶斯估计方法。利用对称损失函数和非对称损失函数分别推导了系统可靠性的贝叶斯估计。利用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法进行了一些复杂的计算。仿真研究了贝叶斯估计和非贝叶斯估计对SS可靠性的精度。此外,利用模拟方法对均匀先验和伽马先验情况下的贝叶斯估计进行了比较研究。所提供的方法最终应用于使用所讨论的模型和头颈癌数据的实际数据。根据一项研究的结果,更大的样本量导致两种技术的可靠性估计更好。一般来说,随着异常值数量的增加,两种方法的测量精度都降低。在所有情况下,预防性损失函数下的贝叶斯估计都优于备选损失函数下的观察估计。实际数据分析为理论和模拟研究提供了保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Data Science
Annals of Data Science Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Annals of Data Science (ADS) publishes cutting-edge research findings, experimental results and case studies of data science. Although Data Science is regarded as an interdisciplinary field of using mathematics, statistics, databases, data mining, high-performance computing, knowledge management and virtualization to discover knowledge from Big Data, it should have its own scientific contents, such as axioms, laws and rules, which are fundamentally important for experts in different fields to explore their own interests from Big Data. ADS encourages contributors to address such challenging problems at this exchange platform. At present, how to discover knowledge from heterogeneous data under Big Data environment needs to be addressed.     ADS is a series of volumes edited by either the editorial office or guest editors. Guest editors will be responsible for call-for-papers and the review process for high-quality contributions in their volumes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信