The CogniAid trial. The impact of two hearing aid signal processing strategies on cognition

G. D. Searchfield, Megan J. McAuliffe, Christine Fok, Tin Aung Kyaw, Eric Williams, L. Burton-Harris, Gavin Coad, Jonny Grady, Alice Smith, D. Vajsakovic
{"title":"The CogniAid trial. The impact of two hearing aid signal processing strategies on cognition","authors":"G. D. Searchfield, Megan J. McAuliffe, Christine Fok, Tin Aung Kyaw, Eric Williams, L. Burton-Harris, Gavin Coad, Jonny Grady, Alice Smith, D. Vajsakovic","doi":"10.3389/fauot.2024.1285496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Untreated hearing loss is a risk factor for age-related cognitive decline and hearing aids have been shown to slow cognitive decline in a population at risk for dementia. This double-blind multiple site randomized trial tested the hypothesis that for older adults with below-average cognition, a “Simple” hearing aid fitting strategy (based on linear amplification with output limiting compression signal processing) would improve hearing and cognition more than a “Standard” approach (adaptive compression-based processing).Two hundred and fifty-six adults aged over 65 were screened for cognitive function using the NIH toolbox cognitive battery. Participants with below median age-adjusted fluid composite cognitive scores (<100) were eligible to participate (n = 104). Sixty-seven eligible participants proceeded to trial and were randomized 1:1 to a simple or standard hearing aid fitting. Participants in the Standard group were fitted with hearing aids matched to non-linear real-ear prescription targets (either NAL-NL1 or NL2), while participants in the Simple group were fitted with hearing aids matched to linear prescription targets (NAL-R). Participants and researchers not fitting the hearing aids were blinded to allocation.Forty-eight participants completed assessments in 12 months. The Standard hearing aid group improved on measures of fluid cognition and hearing. There was a statistically significant difference in fluid cognition scores between groups. The fluid cognition composite score for participants receiving the Simple fitting changed by 3.5 points. Those with the Standard fitting improved by 10.3 points. Hearing outcomes for each group were improved by the same amount.This is the first study to show that hearing aid fitting strategies using markedly different signal processing result in significantly different cognitive outcomes after 12 months of use. The Standard fitting resulted in greater improvement in cognition than the Simpler fitting which was the opposite result to what had been hypothesized. The results reinforce findings indicating hearing aid benefits for the elderly and that they improve cognition.","PeriodicalId":483207,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","volume":"3 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fauot.2024.1285496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Untreated hearing loss is a risk factor for age-related cognitive decline and hearing aids have been shown to slow cognitive decline in a population at risk for dementia. This double-blind multiple site randomized trial tested the hypothesis that for older adults with below-average cognition, a “Simple” hearing aid fitting strategy (based on linear amplification with output limiting compression signal processing) would improve hearing and cognition more than a “Standard” approach (adaptive compression-based processing).Two hundred and fifty-six adults aged over 65 were screened for cognitive function using the NIH toolbox cognitive battery. Participants with below median age-adjusted fluid composite cognitive scores (<100) were eligible to participate (n = 104). Sixty-seven eligible participants proceeded to trial and were randomized 1:1 to a simple or standard hearing aid fitting. Participants in the Standard group were fitted with hearing aids matched to non-linear real-ear prescription targets (either NAL-NL1 or NL2), while participants in the Simple group were fitted with hearing aids matched to linear prescription targets (NAL-R). Participants and researchers not fitting the hearing aids were blinded to allocation.Forty-eight participants completed assessments in 12 months. The Standard hearing aid group improved on measures of fluid cognition and hearing. There was a statistically significant difference in fluid cognition scores between groups. The fluid cognition composite score for participants receiving the Simple fitting changed by 3.5 points. Those with the Standard fitting improved by 10.3 points. Hearing outcomes for each group were improved by the same amount.This is the first study to show that hearing aid fitting strategies using markedly different signal processing result in significantly different cognitive outcomes after 12 months of use. The Standard fitting resulted in greater improvement in cognition than the Simpler fitting which was the opposite result to what had been hypothesized. The results reinforce findings indicating hearing aid benefits for the elderly and that they improve cognition.
CogniAid 试验。两种助听器信号处理策略对认知的影响
未经治疗的听力损失是与年龄相关的认知能力下降的一个风险因素,而助听器已被证明可以减缓痴呆症高危人群的认知能力下降。这项双盲多点随机试验测试了以下假设:对于认知能力低于平均水平的老年人,"简单 "助听器验配策略(基于线性放大和输出限制压缩信号处理)比 "标准 "方法(基于自适应压缩处理)更能改善听力和认知能力。年龄调整后流体综合认知分数低于中位数(<100)的参与者有资格参加(n = 104)。67 名符合条件的参与者参加了试验,并按 1:1 的比例随机选配了简单或标准助听器。标准组的参与者配戴的助听器与非线性实耳处方目标(NAL-NL1 或 NL2)相匹配,而简单组的参与者配戴的助听器与线性处方目标(NAL-R)相匹配。48 名参与者在 12 个月内完成了评估。标准助听器组在流体认知和听力方面均有改善。各组之间的流体认知得分差异具有统计学意义。接受简单验配的参与者的流体认知综合得分提高了 3.5 分。接受标准配置的参与者的流体认知综合得分提高了 10.3 分。这是首次有研究表明,助听器验配策略采用明显不同的信号处理方式,会在使用 12 个月后产生显著不同的认知结果。标准验配比简化验配对认知能力的改善更大,这与假设的结果正好相反。这些结果进一步证实了助听器对老年人的益处以及助听器对认知能力的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信