Cross-sectional survey of health literacy among health science students in Singapore

Kenrick Y Cheong, Syed Munauwwar B Syed Mahmud, Nicole W Chng, Geralyn J Kwek, Clement C Yan, Meredith T Yeung
{"title":"Cross-sectional survey of health literacy among health science students in Singapore","authors":"Kenrick Y Cheong, Syed Munauwwar B Syed Mahmud, Nicole W Chng, Geralyn J Kwek, Clement C Yan, Meredith T Yeung","doi":"10.1177/27550834231222382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Health literacy proficiency is essential for health care professionals to provide quality patient care. There is limited research exploring health literacy proficiency among undergraduate health science students. Objectives: To determine health literacy among health science students in Singapore using the electronic Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Design: A cross-sectional survey using purposive sampling was conducted among undergraduate health science students. Methodology: This study hypothesises that health literacy is influenced by gender, and it increases with the level of health science education, attributed to the increased exposure to the health care system and health care education as undergraduates progress through the years of study. Eligible students from the 4-year entry-level programmes of diagnostic radiography, dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, radiation therapy and speech and language therapy, aged from 21 to 50, were invited. Exclusion criteria were students who were no longer studying due to dropping out or having immediately graduated from these programmes and students in the accelerated programmes whose studies would be completed in less than 4 years. Results: In total, 111 respondents (72 females and 37 males) completed surveys (response rate, 7.7%) returned from physiotherapy (n = 69), occupational therapy (n = 25), diagnostic radiography (n = 12) and dietetics (n = 5), with nil from radiation therapy and speech and language therapy. All participants were English literate. Female participants demonstrated higher HLQ with a mean total score of 30.67 (standard deviation (SD) = 0.61) versus male participants 29.83 (SD = 0.53). Year 2, 3 and 4 students generally scored higher than Year 1 across all nine HLQ scales. Overall, dietetics students had the highest total score on the HLQ, while the diagnostic radiography students had the lowest scores for all the nine HLQ scales. Conclusion: This study established the health literacy level of health science students in Singapore. Gender and years of study influenced health literacy levels, supporting the hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":75087,"journal":{"name":"The journal of medicine access","volume":"24 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of medicine access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27550834231222382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health literacy proficiency is essential for health care professionals to provide quality patient care. There is limited research exploring health literacy proficiency among undergraduate health science students. Objectives: To determine health literacy among health science students in Singapore using the electronic Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Design: A cross-sectional survey using purposive sampling was conducted among undergraduate health science students. Methodology: This study hypothesises that health literacy is influenced by gender, and it increases with the level of health science education, attributed to the increased exposure to the health care system and health care education as undergraduates progress through the years of study. Eligible students from the 4-year entry-level programmes of diagnostic radiography, dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, radiation therapy and speech and language therapy, aged from 21 to 50, were invited. Exclusion criteria were students who were no longer studying due to dropping out or having immediately graduated from these programmes and students in the accelerated programmes whose studies would be completed in less than 4 years. Results: In total, 111 respondents (72 females and 37 males) completed surveys (response rate, 7.7%) returned from physiotherapy (n = 69), occupational therapy (n = 25), diagnostic radiography (n = 12) and dietetics (n = 5), with nil from radiation therapy and speech and language therapy. All participants were English literate. Female participants demonstrated higher HLQ with a mean total score of 30.67 (standard deviation (SD) = 0.61) versus male participants 29.83 (SD = 0.53). Year 2, 3 and 4 students generally scored higher than Year 1 across all nine HLQ scales. Overall, dietetics students had the highest total score on the HLQ, while the diagnostic radiography students had the lowest scores for all the nine HLQ scales. Conclusion: This study established the health literacy level of health science students in Singapore. Gender and years of study influenced health literacy levels, supporting the hypothesis.
新加坡卫生科学专业学生健康素养横断面调查
背景:健康素养能力对于医护人员提供高质量的病人护理至关重要。目前,针对健康科学本科生健康素养能力的研究还很有限。研究目的使用电子健康素养问卷(HLQ)了解新加坡健康科学专业学生的健康素养。设计:在保健科学专业本科生中采用目的性抽样进行横断面调查。调查方法:本研究假设健康素养受性别影响,并随着健康科学教育水平的提高而提高,这是因为随着本科生学习年限的增加,他们接触的医疗保健系统和医疗保健教育也在增加。该研究邀请了来自放射诊断学、营养学、职业治疗学、物理治疗学、放射治疗学以及言语和语言治疗学四年制入门级课程的合格学生参加,他们的年龄在 21 岁至 50 岁之间。排除标准是因辍学或刚从这些课程毕业而不再学习的学生,以及学习时间少于 4 年的速成课程学生。结果:共有 111 名受访者(72 名女性和 37 名男性)完成了调查(回复率为 7.7%),他们分别来自物理治疗专业(69 人)、职业治疗专业(25 人)、放射诊断专业(12 人)和营养学专业(5 人),放射治疗专业和言语及语言治疗专业的受访者为零。所有参与者均懂英语。女性参与者的 HLQ 值较高,平均总分为 30.67(标准差 (SD) = 0.61),而男性参与者的 HLQ 值为 29.83(标准差 = 0.53)。在所有九个 HLQ 量表中,二、三、四年级学生的得分普遍高于一年级学生。总体而言,营养学专业学生的 HLQ 总分最高,而放射诊断专业学生在所有九个 HLQ 量表中的得分最低。结论本研究确定了新加坡健康科学专业学生的健康素养水平。性别和学习年限对健康素养水平有影响,支持了假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信