Metrics Matter

Jenniffer T. Paguio, PhD, MA, RN
{"title":"Metrics Matter","authors":"Jenniffer T. Paguio, PhD, MA, RN","doi":"10.47895/amp.v58i1.9583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is limited evidence to substantially describe the state of Patient Safety (PS) in the Philippines.1,2 With most publications reflecting respondent-based assessments of institutional patient safety culture, patient-sensitive and records-based indicators are scarce. 3 Despite the Institute of Medicine’s4 call to action to address preventable errors and the publication of patient safety indicators5 , there has been slow progress in patient safety in the country. \nThe Department of Health’s release of the National Policy on Patient Safety (Administrative Order 2008-0023) 6 and the creation of the National Patient Safety Committee (NPSC) were pivotal in elevating patient safety as priority in Philippine healthcare facilities. The creation of PS committees across hospitals and the mainstreaming of patient safety through campaigns and conferences helped push institution-level research and design programs to reduce events.7,8 The National Policy on Patient Safety in Health Facilities (Administrative Order 2020-0007) 9 presented specific guidelines and strategies for the full implementation of PS programs, including directives on the roles and responsibilities of patient safety officers, strategies to address patient safety issues, and indicators for monitoring. The above national and institutional efforts to promote patient safety strategies are gaining momentum, but without metrics, it is impossible to determine if these initiatives result in real-world changes. \nAccurate, reliable, and timely patient safety-sensitive indicators feed learning systems. 10,11 Metrics for patient safety allow for accurate analysis that translate to responsive actions to mitigate risks, ensure continuous improvement, monitor progress, and impact patient-, organization-, and health worker-related outcomes. However, the findings of incapacitated patientsafety committees, missing risk management and patient-centered initiatives, and inconsistent reporting systems are highly concerning. \nWhile hospitals have complied with the activities stipulated in the national policies, the superficial compliance reflects the lack of investment in patient safety architecture. The committee chairs and members are burdened with competing priorities, leaving them with little time to fulfil their roles in policy development, data analysis, and system improvements. These responsibilities are mere add-ons to their already brimming schedules, and the meager budget, if any, further hinders program implementation and their engagement in essential training. \nInadequate time dedicated to engaging in patient safety-focused activities of frontline healthcare personnel 12 could also explain why some patient and direct care indicators receive lower reporting than others like falls, medication errors, adverse drug events, and missed care. Reporting and contributing to learning systems can become a burden for nurses and physicians with inhumane workloads, 13-15 further exacerbating the issue. \nInconsistencies in available data can be attributed to the lack of a mature patient safety culture, resulting in reluctance to report indicators. These indicators are often regarded as a reflection of poor performance or incompetence.16,17 Moreover, commendations for low adverse event reports and high patient satisfaction ratings perpetuate the practice of not disclosing an organization’s shortcomings. A reliable baseline that indicates the severity of the situation is crucial for good results to have any significance. Without a balanced system that encourages reporting, feedback, and actionable practice changes, reports will continue to be inconsistent. \nThe study makes sound recommendations to use a unified set of patient safety indicators and protocols for regular measurement, analysis, and improvements integrated into a national reporting system. This system would guide collection, collation, classification, and analysis of patient safety problems that will guide improvements.10 It starts with investing in reliable structures (personnel, funding, policies) and clear processes at the country and facility level. A culture and mindset shift are also essential to optimize patient safety structures and processes that includes a blame-free environment, the practice of enhanced feedback, champions and role models, and education and training 12,18 on core concepts in patient safety and how to analyze data to generate meaningful outcomes. \nOur goal of establishing a comprehensive patient safety learning system is an arduous and complex undertaking. Achieving a high-reliability learning system necessitates the cultivation of a safety-oriented culture, which takes time to develop. However, implementing a metric for reporting and monitoring patient safety issues in hospitals would be a vital initial step toward this goal. Ultimately, the establishment of a patient safety learning system that addresses the needs of patients and healthcare workers would result in a significant improvement in patient safety outcomes.","PeriodicalId":502328,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":"41 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v58i1.9583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is limited evidence to substantially describe the state of Patient Safety (PS) in the Philippines.1,2 With most publications reflecting respondent-based assessments of institutional patient safety culture, patient-sensitive and records-based indicators are scarce. 3 Despite the Institute of Medicine’s4 call to action to address preventable errors and the publication of patient safety indicators5 , there has been slow progress in patient safety in the country. The Department of Health’s release of the National Policy on Patient Safety (Administrative Order 2008-0023) 6 and the creation of the National Patient Safety Committee (NPSC) were pivotal in elevating patient safety as priority in Philippine healthcare facilities. The creation of PS committees across hospitals and the mainstreaming of patient safety through campaigns and conferences helped push institution-level research and design programs to reduce events.7,8 The National Policy on Patient Safety in Health Facilities (Administrative Order 2020-0007) 9 presented specific guidelines and strategies for the full implementation of PS programs, including directives on the roles and responsibilities of patient safety officers, strategies to address patient safety issues, and indicators for monitoring. The above national and institutional efforts to promote patient safety strategies are gaining momentum, but without metrics, it is impossible to determine if these initiatives result in real-world changes. Accurate, reliable, and timely patient safety-sensitive indicators feed learning systems. 10,11 Metrics for patient safety allow for accurate analysis that translate to responsive actions to mitigate risks, ensure continuous improvement, monitor progress, and impact patient-, organization-, and health worker-related outcomes. However, the findings of incapacitated patientsafety committees, missing risk management and patient-centered initiatives, and inconsistent reporting systems are highly concerning. While hospitals have complied with the activities stipulated in the national policies, the superficial compliance reflects the lack of investment in patient safety architecture. The committee chairs and members are burdened with competing priorities, leaving them with little time to fulfil their roles in policy development, data analysis, and system improvements. These responsibilities are mere add-ons to their already brimming schedules, and the meager budget, if any, further hinders program implementation and their engagement in essential training. Inadequate time dedicated to engaging in patient safety-focused activities of frontline healthcare personnel 12 could also explain why some patient and direct care indicators receive lower reporting than others like falls, medication errors, adverse drug events, and missed care. Reporting and contributing to learning systems can become a burden for nurses and physicians with inhumane workloads, 13-15 further exacerbating the issue. Inconsistencies in available data can be attributed to the lack of a mature patient safety culture, resulting in reluctance to report indicators. These indicators are often regarded as a reflection of poor performance or incompetence.16,17 Moreover, commendations for low adverse event reports and high patient satisfaction ratings perpetuate the practice of not disclosing an organization’s shortcomings. A reliable baseline that indicates the severity of the situation is crucial for good results to have any significance. Without a balanced system that encourages reporting, feedback, and actionable practice changes, reports will continue to be inconsistent. The study makes sound recommendations to use a unified set of patient safety indicators and protocols for regular measurement, analysis, and improvements integrated into a national reporting system. This system would guide collection, collation, classification, and analysis of patient safety problems that will guide improvements.10 It starts with investing in reliable structures (personnel, funding, policies) and clear processes at the country and facility level. A culture and mindset shift are also essential to optimize patient safety structures and processes that includes a blame-free environment, the practice of enhanced feedback, champions and role models, and education and training 12,18 on core concepts in patient safety and how to analyze data to generate meaningful outcomes. Our goal of establishing a comprehensive patient safety learning system is an arduous and complex undertaking. Achieving a high-reliability learning system necessitates the cultivation of a safety-oriented culture, which takes time to develop. However, implementing a metric for reporting and monitoring patient safety issues in hospitals would be a vital initial step toward this goal. Ultimately, the establishment of a patient safety learning system that addresses the needs of patients and healthcare workers would result in a significant improvement in patient safety outcomes.
衡量标准很重要
1,2 由于大多数出版物反映的是基于受访者的机构患者安全文化评估,因此对患者敏感的、基于记录的指标很少。3 尽管医学研究所(Institute of Medicine)4 呼吁采取行动解决可预防的错误,并公布了患者安全指标5 ,但菲律宾在患者安全方面进展缓慢。卫生部发布的《国家患者安全政策》(2008-0023 号行政命令)6 和国家患者安全委员会(NPSC)的成立,对于将患者安全提升为菲律宾医疗机构的优先事项至关重要。7,8 《医疗机构患者安全国家政策》(第 2020-0007 号行政令)9 提出了全面实施患者安全计划的具体指导方针和战略,包括患者安全官员的作用和职责、解决患者安全问题的战略以及监测指标。上述国家和机构为促进患者安全战略所做的努力正在取得势头,但如果没有衡量标准,就无法确定这些举措是否会带来实际变化。准确、可靠、及时的患者安全指标是学习系统的基础。10,11患者安全指标可用于准确分析,并转化为响应行动,以降低风险、确保持续改进、监控进展,并影响患者、组织和医务工作者的相关结果。然而,患者安全委员会无能为力、风险管理和以患者为中心的举措缺失以及报告系统不一致等问题令人高度担忧。虽然医院遵守了国家政策中规定的活动,但表面上的遵守反映出医院对患者安全架构的投资不足。委员会的主席和成员忙于应付各种优先事项,几乎没有时间履行其在政策制定、数据分析和系统改进方面的职责。这些职责只是他们本已排得满满当当的日程表上的附加项目,而微薄的预算(如果有的话)进一步阻碍了计划的实施和他们参与必要的培训。一线医护人员没有足够的时间参与以患者安全为重点的活动,这也可以解释为什么一些患者和直接护理指标的报告率低于其他指标,如跌倒、用药错误、药物不良事件和护理遗漏。对于工作负担沉重的护士和医生来说,报告并为学习系统做出贡献可能会成为一种负担,13-15 从而进一步加剧了这一问题。现有数据的不一致性可归因于缺乏成熟的患者安全文化,导致不愿报告指标。16,17 此外,对不良事件报告少和患者满意度高的表扬,也使不披露机构缺陷的做法得以延续。要想取得好的结果,关键是要有一个可靠的基线来表明情况的严重性。如果没有一个平衡的系统来鼓励报告、反馈和可行的实践变革,报告将继续不一致。这项研究提出了合理的建议,即使用一套统一的患者安全指标和协议来进行定期测量、分析和改进,并将其纳入国家报告系统。该系统将指导收集、整理、分类和分析患者安全问题,从而指导改进工作。10 首先要在国家和机构层面投资建立可靠的机构(人员、资金、政策)和明确的流程。文化和思维方式的转变对于优化患者安全结构和流程也至关重要,其中包括无责环境、加强反馈的做法、拥护者和榜样,以及关于患者安全核心理念和如何分析数据以产生有意义结果的教育和培训12,18。我们的目标是建立一个全面的患者安全学习系统,这是一项艰巨而复杂的任务。要建立一个高可靠性的学习系统,就必须培养一种以安全为导向的文化,而这种文化的形成需要时间。然而,在医院中实施一种用于报告和监控患者安全问题的衡量标准,将是实现这一目标的重要第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信