Shadowing effect of an existing tunnel on the evolution of soil arching: impact of tunnel shape

Ruixiao Zhang, Dongfeng Su, Xing-tao Lin, Hong-Jun Lou, X. Chen
{"title":"Shadowing effect of an existing tunnel on the evolution of soil arching: impact of tunnel shape","authors":"Ruixiao Zhang, Dongfeng Su, Xing-tao Lin, Hong-Jun Lou, X. Chen","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2023-0439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the shadowing effect of existing tunnels on the evolution of soil arching, focusing on the shape of the tunnel (circular and rectangular) through trapdoor experiments. The displacement and shear strain distributions of ground soil resulting from trapdoor movement were estimated using a digital image correlation technique. The results showed that the shadowing effect of the rectangular tunnel was significantly greater than that of the circular tunnel of the same size. The sand above the tunnel was displaced in a double-groove pattern owing to the presence of the tunnel, and the maximum surface settlement occurred between the tunnel boundary and the trapdoor edge. The circular tunnels exhibited consistently higher maximum surface displacements than that in the rectangular tunnels. The shear strain value of soil was lower for the rectangular tunnel case than that for the circular tunnel case. The rectangular tunnels required lesser trapdoor displacement than that of the circular tunnel to obtain the minimum soil arching ratio. The minimum and ultimate soil arching ratios increased as the burial depth ratio increased for both the tunnel shapes. The maximum stress ratio of the tunnel crown was consistently larger for the circular case than for the rectangular case.","PeriodicalId":505159,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","volume":"93 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2023-0439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the shadowing effect of existing tunnels on the evolution of soil arching, focusing on the shape of the tunnel (circular and rectangular) through trapdoor experiments. The displacement and shear strain distributions of ground soil resulting from trapdoor movement were estimated using a digital image correlation technique. The results showed that the shadowing effect of the rectangular tunnel was significantly greater than that of the circular tunnel of the same size. The sand above the tunnel was displaced in a double-groove pattern owing to the presence of the tunnel, and the maximum surface settlement occurred between the tunnel boundary and the trapdoor edge. The circular tunnels exhibited consistently higher maximum surface displacements than that in the rectangular tunnels. The shear strain value of soil was lower for the rectangular tunnel case than that for the circular tunnel case. The rectangular tunnels required lesser trapdoor displacement than that of the circular tunnel to obtain the minimum soil arching ratio. The minimum and ultimate soil arching ratios increased as the burial depth ratio increased for both the tunnel shapes. The maximum stress ratio of the tunnel crown was consistently larger for the circular case than for the rectangular case.
现有隧道对土拱演变的阴影效应:隧道形状的影响
本研究通过活板门实验评估了既有隧道对土壤起拱演变的阴影效应,重点关注隧道的形状(圆形和矩形)。采用数字图像相关技术估算了活门运动导致的地表土壤位移和剪切应变分布。结果表明,矩形隧道的阴影效应明显大于相同尺寸的圆形隧道。由于隧道的存在,隧道上方的沙土呈双沟槽状位移,最大地表沉降发生在隧道边界和活门边缘之间。圆形隧道的最大表面位移始终高于矩形隧道。矩形隧道的土壤剪应变值低于圆形隧道。与圆形隧道相比,矩形隧道需要较小的活门位移来获得最小土壤拱起比。对于两种形状的隧道,随着埋深比的增加,最小土拱度比和极限土拱度比也随之增加。圆形隧道洞顶的最大应力比始终大于矩形隧道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信