Human Understanding and Perception of Unanticipated Robot Action in the Context of Physical Interaction

Naoko Abe, Yue Hu, M. Benallegue, N. Yamanobe, G. Venture, Eiichi Yoshida
{"title":"Human Understanding and Perception of Unanticipated Robot Action in the Context of Physical Interaction","authors":"Naoko Abe, Yue Hu, M. Benallegue, N. Yamanobe, G. Venture, Eiichi Yoshida","doi":"10.1145/3643458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anticipating a future scenario where the robot initiates its own actions and behaves voluntarily when collaborating with humans, our research focuses on human understanding and perception of unanticipated robot actions during physical human-robot interaction. While the current literature searches for key factors that make the human-robot collaboration successful, the question of how people experience the robot’s unanticipated action as cooperative or uncooperative seems to remain open. We designed a game-based experiment (N=35) where the participant played a “catch-falling-coins” game by moving a robotic arm. Our experiment introduced unanticipated robot actions in an “active session” where the robot targeted higher-valued coins without first informing the participants. Through semi-structured interviews and statistical analysis of questionnaires (Big Five Personality Test, SAM, NARS and CH33), we examined the participants’ understanding of the robot’s “intention” and their positive or negative perception of the robot as cooperative or uncooperative. Among the participants who understood that the robot’s “intention” was to catch the higher-valued coins, the majority of them reported a positive perception of the robot (cooperative or helpful) while this was not the case among those who did not understand the robot’s intention. We also observed relevant relationships between some personality traits and a person’s understanding of the robot’s intention. Qualitative analysis of the interviews allowed us to structure the process of perception change during the game into three phases: confusion, investigation, and adaptation. We believe that our research contributes to the study of human perception, and particularly to the relationship between a human’s understanding of unanticipated robot actions and their positive or negative perception of the robot.","PeriodicalId":504644,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3643458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anticipating a future scenario where the robot initiates its own actions and behaves voluntarily when collaborating with humans, our research focuses on human understanding and perception of unanticipated robot actions during physical human-robot interaction. While the current literature searches for key factors that make the human-robot collaboration successful, the question of how people experience the robot’s unanticipated action as cooperative or uncooperative seems to remain open. We designed a game-based experiment (N=35) where the participant played a “catch-falling-coins” game by moving a robotic arm. Our experiment introduced unanticipated robot actions in an “active session” where the robot targeted higher-valued coins without first informing the participants. Through semi-structured interviews and statistical analysis of questionnaires (Big Five Personality Test, SAM, NARS and CH33), we examined the participants’ understanding of the robot’s “intention” and their positive or negative perception of the robot as cooperative or uncooperative. Among the participants who understood that the robot’s “intention” was to catch the higher-valued coins, the majority of them reported a positive perception of the robot (cooperative or helpful) while this was not the case among those who did not understand the robot’s intention. We also observed relevant relationships between some personality traits and a person’s understanding of the robot’s intention. Qualitative analysis of the interviews allowed us to structure the process of perception change during the game into three phases: confusion, investigation, and adaptation. We believe that our research contributes to the study of human perception, and particularly to the relationship between a human’s understanding of unanticipated robot actions and their positive or negative perception of the robot.
物理交互背景下人类对机器人意外动作的理解和感知
考虑到未来机器人在与人类合作时会主动采取自己的行动,我们的研究重点是人类对人机交互过程中机器人意外行动的理解和感知。虽然目前的文献都在寻找人机协作成功的关键因素,但人们如何将机器人的意外行动视为合作或不合作,这个问题似乎仍未解决。我们设计了一个基于游戏的实验(N=35),参与者通过移动机械臂来玩 "接住掉落的硬币 "游戏。我们的实验在 "主动环节 "中引入了意料之外的机器人动作,机器人在未事先通知参与者的情况下瞄准了价值较高的硬币。通过半结构式访谈和问卷统计分析(大五人格测试、SAM、NARS 和 CH33),我们考察了参与者对机器人 "意图 "的理解,以及他们对机器人合作或不合作的积极或消极看法。在理解机器人的 "意图 "是抓取价值较高的硬币的参与者中,大多数人对机器人的看法是积极的(合作或乐于助人),而在不理解机器人意图的参与者中,情况并非如此。我们还观察到了一些人格特质与人们对机器人意图的理解之间的相关关系。通过对访谈的定性分析,我们将游戏过程中的感知变化过程分为三个阶段:困惑、调查和适应。我们相信,我们的研究有助于研究人类感知,特别是人类对机器人意外行动的理解与他们对机器人的积极或消极感知之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信