Susceptibility of some Enterobacteriaceae isolated from 4 different aquatic environments in DR Congo (Central Africa), to Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid and some 3rd generation Cephalosporins

Mwanzo Wavindu, Edith B. Mouafo Tamnou, Ildephonse Soly Kamwira, Rosanne M. Ngome, Paul Alain Nana, Geneviève Bricheux, Maximilienne A. Nyegue, Télesphore Sime-Ngando, Moïse Nola
{"title":"Susceptibility of some Enterobacteriaceae isolated from 4 different aquatic environments in DR Congo (Central Africa), to Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid and some 3rd generation Cephalosporins","authors":"Mwanzo Wavindu, Edith B. Mouafo Tamnou, Ildephonse Soly Kamwira, Rosanne M. Ngome, Paul Alain Nana, Geneviève Bricheux, Maximilienne A. Nyegue, Télesphore Sime-Ngando, Moïse Nola","doi":"10.30574/gscbps.2024.26.1.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little is known about the variation of the antibiotic susceptibility of different bacterial strains of the same cells species, isolated from different aquatic environments. The present study aims to evaluate the susceptibility towards some 3rd generation cephalosporins (Ceftriaxon, Ceftazidim and Cefotaxim) and Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid, of Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from groundwater, stream, hospital wastewater and slaughterhouse wastewater. Enterobacteria species were isolated on Mac Conkey agar, then identified using enzymatic and MALDI-TOF MS system. The antimicrobial susceptibility was carried out using the disk diffusion method. The antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were carried using the VITEK®2 system. Bacterial species mostly identified were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi and Ewingelia americana. The antibiotic inhibition diameters and the MICs varied depending on the antibiotics, bacterial species and type of aquatic environment hosting the microorganism. Relatively lower MICs were recorded with Cefotaxim against different bacteria in slaughterhouse wastewater, in river water and in well water. Antibiotic resistance was noted with all strains from hospital wastewater. Significant differences (P˂0.05) amongst antibiotic inhibition diameter was noted for K. pneumoniae and S. typhi in most cases. The relative variations in the action mechanisms amongst antibiotics and the intrinsic defense potential of each bacterial strain, as well as the potential influence of the physicochemical properties of each water medium, could partly be at the origin of the relative differences observed at the phenotypic level. It seems necessary to explore the diversity, similarities and differences amongst antibiotic resistance genes in these different types of aquatic biotopes.","PeriodicalId":12808,"journal":{"name":"GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"7 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2024.26.1.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little is known about the variation of the antibiotic susceptibility of different bacterial strains of the same cells species, isolated from different aquatic environments. The present study aims to evaluate the susceptibility towards some 3rd generation cephalosporins (Ceftriaxon, Ceftazidim and Cefotaxim) and Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid, of Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from groundwater, stream, hospital wastewater and slaughterhouse wastewater. Enterobacteria species were isolated on Mac Conkey agar, then identified using enzymatic and MALDI-TOF MS system. The antimicrobial susceptibility was carried out using the disk diffusion method. The antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were carried using the VITEK®2 system. Bacterial species mostly identified were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi and Ewingelia americana. The antibiotic inhibition diameters and the MICs varied depending on the antibiotics, bacterial species and type of aquatic environment hosting the microorganism. Relatively lower MICs were recorded with Cefotaxim against different bacteria in slaughterhouse wastewater, in river water and in well water. Antibiotic resistance was noted with all strains from hospital wastewater. Significant differences (P˂0.05) amongst antibiotic inhibition diameter was noted for K. pneumoniae and S. typhi in most cases. The relative variations in the action mechanisms amongst antibiotics and the intrinsic defense potential of each bacterial strain, as well as the potential influence of the physicochemical properties of each water medium, could partly be at the origin of the relative differences observed at the phenotypic level. It seems necessary to explore the diversity, similarities and differences amongst antibiotic resistance genes in these different types of aquatic biotopes.
从刚果民主共和国(中非)4 种不同水生环境中分离的一些肠杆菌科细菌对阿莫西林/克拉维酸和一些第三代头孢菌素的敏感性
人们对从不同水生环境中分离出来的同一细胞物种的不同细菌菌株对抗生素的敏感性差异知之甚少。本研究旨在评估从地下水、溪流、医院废水和屠宰场废水中分离出的肠杆菌科菌株对一些第三代头孢菌素(头孢曲松、头孢噻啶和头孢他啶)和阿莫西林/克拉维酸的敏感性。在麦康凯琼脂上分离出肠杆菌属菌种,然后使用酶法和 MALDI-TOF MS 系统进行鉴定。抗菌药敏感性采用盘扩散法进行测定。抗生素最低抑菌浓度(MICs)采用 VITEK®2 系统进行测定。鉴定出的细菌种类主要有肺炎克雷伯菌、大肠埃希菌、伤寒沙门氏菌和美洲鞘氨醇杆菌。抗生素抑菌直径和 MICs 因抗生素、细菌种类和微生物栖息的水生环境类型而异。在屠宰场废水、河水和井水中,头孢他啶对不同细菌的 MIC 值相对较低。医院废水中的所有菌株都出现了抗生素耐药性。在大多数情况下,肺炎克氏菌和伤寒杆菌的抗生素抑菌直径存在显著差异(P˂0.05)。抗生素之间作用机制的相对差异和每种细菌菌株的内在防御潜力,以及每种水介质理化性质的潜在影响,可能是在表型水平上观察到的相对差异的部分原因。看来有必要探索这些不同类型水生生物群落中抗生素抗性基因的多样性、相似性和差异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信