Functional diversity among coral reef fishes as consumers of ectoparasites

IF 2.7 2区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Matthew D. Nicholson, J. Andrés Pagán, Gina C. Hendrick, Paul C. Sikkel
{"title":"Functional diversity among coral reef fishes as consumers of ectoparasites","authors":"Matthew D. Nicholson, J. Andrés Pagán, Gina C. Hendrick, Paul C. Sikkel","doi":"10.1007/s00338-023-02459-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nearly all organisms must cope with parasitic infestation, and most research on parasite ecology in marine systems has focused on the variety of both direct and indirect impacts that parasites can have on hosts. In coral reef ecosystems, gnathiid isopods are one of the most common ectoparasites of fishes. For individuals infested with gnathiids, there is a heavy reliance on intraspecific mutualisms where specialist species groom or “clean” parasites off host fishes. However, gnathiids spend most of their time free-living and not associated with a host and are thus susceptible to consumption by non-cleaner fish species. Here, we investigated if non-cleaner and facultative (less specialized) cleaner fish consume ectoparasitic gnathiid isopods as often or in similar quantities as dedicated (highly specialized) cleaners. To do so, we sampled the gut contents of 797 fishes, representing 61 species and including both cleaner and non-cleaner fishes, to compare their consumption of gnathiid isopods. We found that although there is some site level variation, cleaner fishes eat significantly more gnathiids, and eat them more frequently, compared to non-cleaner fishes. Our results highlight the importance of both dedicated and facultative cleaners as consumers of ectoparasites and show that their role is unlikely to be supplanted by non-cleaner consumers. Furthermore, we suggest that different cleaner species act as complementary rather than redundant specialists.</p>","PeriodicalId":10821,"journal":{"name":"Coral Reefs","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coral Reefs","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-023-02459-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nearly all organisms must cope with parasitic infestation, and most research on parasite ecology in marine systems has focused on the variety of both direct and indirect impacts that parasites can have on hosts. In coral reef ecosystems, gnathiid isopods are one of the most common ectoparasites of fishes. For individuals infested with gnathiids, there is a heavy reliance on intraspecific mutualisms where specialist species groom or “clean” parasites off host fishes. However, gnathiids spend most of their time free-living and not associated with a host and are thus susceptible to consumption by non-cleaner fish species. Here, we investigated if non-cleaner and facultative (less specialized) cleaner fish consume ectoparasitic gnathiid isopods as often or in similar quantities as dedicated (highly specialized) cleaners. To do so, we sampled the gut contents of 797 fishes, representing 61 species and including both cleaner and non-cleaner fishes, to compare their consumption of gnathiid isopods. We found that although there is some site level variation, cleaner fishes eat significantly more gnathiids, and eat them more frequently, compared to non-cleaner fishes. Our results highlight the importance of both dedicated and facultative cleaners as consumers of ectoparasites and show that their role is unlikely to be supplanted by non-cleaner consumers. Furthermore, we suggest that different cleaner species act as complementary rather than redundant specialists.

Abstract Image

珊瑚礁鱼类作为外寄生虫消费者的功能多样性
几乎所有生物都必须应对寄生虫的侵扰,而对海洋系统中寄生虫生态学的大多数研究都集中在寄生虫对宿主的各种直接和间接影响上。在珊瑚礁生态系统中,等脚类动物是鱼类最常见的体外寄生虫之一。对于被团头鲂寄生的个体来说,主要依靠种内互生关系,由专门物种将寄生虫从宿主鱼类身上 "清理 "掉。然而,团头鲂大部分时间都是自由生活的,与宿主无关,因此很容易被非清洁鱼类吃掉。在这里,我们研究了非清洁鱼类和兼性(专一性较低)清洁鱼类是否与专一性(高度专一性)清洁鱼类一样经常或以类似的数量摄食外寄生的团头鲂等脚类动物。为此,我们对代表 61 个物种的 797 种鱼类(包括清洁鱼类和非清洁鱼类)的肠道内容物进行了取样,以比较它们摄食团尾类等脚类动物的情况。我们发现,虽然存在一些地点水平上的差异,但与非清洁鱼类相比,清洁鱼类吃的团头鲂明显更多,吃的频率也更高。我们的研究结果凸显了专职清洁工和兼性清洁工作为外寄生虫消费者的重要性,并表明它们的作用不太可能被非清洁工消费者取代。此外,我们还发现,不同的清洁鱼类是互补的,而不是多余的专家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Coral Reefs
Coral Reefs 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Coral Reefs, the Journal of the International Coral Reef Society, presents multidisciplinary literature across the broad fields of reef studies, publishing analytical and theoretical papers on both modern and ancient reefs. These encourage the search for theories about reef structure and dynamics, and the use of experimentation, modeling, quantification and the applied sciences. Coverage includes such subject areas as population dynamics; community ecology of reef organisms; energy and nutrient flows; biogeochemical cycles; physiology of calcification; reef responses to natural and anthropogenic influences; stress markers in reef organisms; behavioural ecology; sedimentology; diagenesis; reef structure and morphology; evolutionary ecology of the reef biota; palaeoceanography of coral reefs and coral islands; reef management and its underlying disciplines; molecular biology and genetics of coral; aetiology of disease in reef-related organisms; reef responses to global change, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信