Differential expression of antimicrobial metabolites, phenylpropanoid and phytohormone metabolic pathway genes determines resistance or susceptibility to Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea
Surender Singh Chandel, Dinesh Subhash Gaikwad, Rajeev Rathour, Vineet K. Dohru, Asmita Sirari, Uday Jha, Swarup Parida, Kamal Dev Sharma
{"title":"Differential expression of antimicrobial metabolites, phenylpropanoid and phytohormone metabolic pathway genes determines resistance or susceptibility to Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea","authors":"Surender Singh Chandel, Dinesh Subhash Gaikwad, Rajeev Rathour, Vineet K. Dohru, Asmita Sirari, Uday Jha, Swarup Parida, Kamal Dev Sharma","doi":"10.1111/ppa.13867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blight caused by <i>Ascochyta rabiei</i> is a major constraint in the productivity of chickpea (<i>Cicer arietinum</i>). The mechanisms governing resistance/susceptibility to blight in chickpea are poorly understood. We used a blight-resistant (HC1) and a blight-susceptible (GPF2) genotype of chickpea and genes of pathogenesis-related proteins (PRPs), phenylpropanoid pathway metabolites, abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellic acid (GA) and jasmonic acid (JA) to understand the role of these in <i>A. rabiei</i> resistance/susceptibility. The JA, ABA and GA biosynthesis genes of chickpea were retrieved, characterized and gene-specific primers were used for transcriptional studies. Gene expression revealed that chickpea activated its defences rather quickly and well before initiation of spore germination. In resistant HC1, the majority of the JA, GA and phenylpropanoid pathway genes had peak maxima at 2 h post-inoculation (hpi) whereas PRPs/defence genes had peak maxima at 24/36 hpi implying that defence to <i>A. rabiei</i> in chickpea is composed of a two-tier system separated by time: immediately after spore attachment and at or just prior to host penetration. Unlike HC1, susceptible GPF2 was late in activation of defence responses or did not activate them. Another striking difference between HC1 and GPF2 was up-regulation of ABA biosynthesis genes in inoculated GPF2 and down-regulation in HC1. This study revealed that phenylpropanoids, PRPs, JA, 8-(1<i>R</i>,2<i>R</i>)-3-oxo-2-(<i>Z</i>)-pent-2-enyl cyclopentyl octanoate, (15<i>Z</i>)-12-oxophyto-10,15-dienoic acid and methyl-jasmonate govern resistance to <i>A. rabiei</i> in chickpea whereas ABA governs susceptibility.","PeriodicalId":20075,"journal":{"name":"Plant Pathology","volume":"222 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13867","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Blight caused by Ascochyta rabiei is a major constraint in the productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum). The mechanisms governing resistance/susceptibility to blight in chickpea are poorly understood. We used a blight-resistant (HC1) and a blight-susceptible (GPF2) genotype of chickpea and genes of pathogenesis-related proteins (PRPs), phenylpropanoid pathway metabolites, abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellic acid (GA) and jasmonic acid (JA) to understand the role of these in A. rabiei resistance/susceptibility. The JA, ABA and GA biosynthesis genes of chickpea were retrieved, characterized and gene-specific primers were used for transcriptional studies. Gene expression revealed that chickpea activated its defences rather quickly and well before initiation of spore germination. In resistant HC1, the majority of the JA, GA and phenylpropanoid pathway genes had peak maxima at 2 h post-inoculation (hpi) whereas PRPs/defence genes had peak maxima at 24/36 hpi implying that defence to A. rabiei in chickpea is composed of a two-tier system separated by time: immediately after spore attachment and at or just prior to host penetration. Unlike HC1, susceptible GPF2 was late in activation of defence responses or did not activate them. Another striking difference between HC1 and GPF2 was up-regulation of ABA biosynthesis genes in inoculated GPF2 and down-regulation in HC1. This study revealed that phenylpropanoids, PRPs, JA, 8-(1R,2R)-3-oxo-2-(Z)-pent-2-enyl cyclopentyl octanoate, (15Z)-12-oxophyto-10,15-dienoic acid and methyl-jasmonate govern resistance to A. rabiei in chickpea whereas ABA governs susceptibility.
期刊介绍:
This international journal, owned and edited by the British Society for Plant Pathology, covers all aspects of plant pathology and reaches subscribers in 80 countries. Top quality original research papers and critical reviews from around the world cover: diseases of temperate and tropical plants caused by fungi, bacteria, viruses, phytoplasmas and nematodes; physiological, biochemical, molecular, ecological, genetic and economic aspects of plant pathology; disease epidemiology and modelling; disease appraisal and crop loss assessment; and plant disease control and disease-related crop management.