Performance of GPT-4V(ision) in Ophthalmology: Use of Images in Clinical Questions

Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Masahiro Miyake, Koji Kitazawa
{"title":"Performance of GPT-4V(ision) in Ophthalmology: Use of Images in Clinical Questions","authors":"Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Masahiro Miyake, Koji Kitazawa","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4 and GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) for clinical questions in ophthalmology.\nMethods: The questions were collected from the \"Diagnosis This\" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented GPT-4V with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy between the two conditions using the chi-square test. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.\nResults: The GPT-4V model demonstrated higher accuracy with images (71.7%) than without images (66.7%, p<0.001). Both GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website [64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)].\nConclusions: The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4 and GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) for clinical questions in ophthalmology. Methods: The questions were collected from the "Diagnosis This" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented GPT-4V with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy between the two conditions using the chi-square test. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website. Results: The GPT-4V model demonstrated higher accuracy with images (71.7%) than without images (66.7%, p<0.001). Both GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website [64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)]. Conclusions: The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.
GPT-4V(ision) 在眼科中的应用:在临床问题中使用图像
背景/目的比较视觉生成预训练变换器(GPT)-4 和视觉生成预训练变换器-4(GPT-4V)对眼科临床问题的诊断准确性:方法:我们从美国眼科学会网站的 "Diagnosis This "栏目中收集了问题。我们测试了 580 个问题,并在两种条件下用相同的问题展示了 GPT-4V:1)多模态模型,包含问题文本和相关图像;2)纯文本模型。然后,我们使用卡方检验比较了两种条件下的准确率差异。我们还从网站上收集了一般正确答案的百分比:有图像的 GPT-4V 模型的准确率(71.7%)高于无图像的(66.7%,p<0.001)。两个 GPT-4 模型的准确率均高于网站上的一般正确答案[64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)]:结论:增加图像信息可提高 GPT-4V 诊断眼科临床问题的性能。这表明,整合多模态数据对于在医疗领域开发更有效、更可靠的诊断工具至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信