Influence of Material Parameter Variability on the Predicted Coronary Artery Biomechanical Environment via Uncertainty Quantification

Caleb C. Berggren, David Jiang, Y. F. Jack Wang, Jake A. Bergquist, Lindsay C. Rupp, Zexin Liu, Rob S. MacLeod, Akil Narayan, Lucas H. Timmins
{"title":"Influence of Material Parameter Variability on the Predicted Coronary Artery Biomechanical Environment via Uncertainty Quantification","authors":"Caleb C. Berggren, David Jiang, Y. F. Jack Wang, Jake A. Bergquist, Lindsay C. Rupp, Zexin Liu, Rob S. MacLeod, Akil Narayan, Lucas H. Timmins","doi":"arxiv-2401.15047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central to the clinical adoption of patient-specific modeling strategies is\ndemonstrating that simulation results are reliable and safe. Simulation\nframeworks must be robust to uncertainty in model input(s), and levels of\nconfidence should accompany results. In this study we applied a coupled\nuncertainty quantification-finite element (FE) framework to understand the\nimpact of uncertainty in vascular material properties on variability in\npredicted stresses. Univariate probability distributions were fit to material\nparameters derived from layer-specific mechanical behavior testing of human\ncoronary tissue. Parameters were assumed to be probabilistically independent,\nallowing for efficient parameter ensemble sampling. In an idealized coronary\nartery geometry, a forward FE model for each parameter ensemble was created to\npredict tissue stresses under physiologic loading. An emulator was constructed\nwithin the UncertainSCI software using polynomial chaos techniques, and\nstatistics and sensitivities were directly computed. Results demonstrated that\nmaterial parameter uncertainty propagates to variability in predicted stresses\nacross the vessel wall, with the largest dispersions in stress within the\nadventitial layer. Variability in stress was most sensitive to uncertainties in\nthe anisotropic component of the strain energy function. Unary and binary\ninteractions within the adventitial layer were the main contributors to stress\nvariance, and the leading factor in stress variability was uncertainty in the\nstress-like material parameter summarizing contribution of the embedded fibers\nto the overall artery stiffness. Results from a patient-specific coronary model\nconfirmed many of these findings. Collectively, this highlights the impact of\nmaterial property variation on predicted artery stresses and presents a\npipeline to explore and characterize uncertainty in computational biomechanics.","PeriodicalId":501572,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2401.15047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central to the clinical adoption of patient-specific modeling strategies is demonstrating that simulation results are reliable and safe. Simulation frameworks must be robust to uncertainty in model input(s), and levels of confidence should accompany results. In this study we applied a coupled uncertainty quantification-finite element (FE) framework to understand the impact of uncertainty in vascular material properties on variability in predicted stresses. Univariate probability distributions were fit to material parameters derived from layer-specific mechanical behavior testing of human coronary tissue. Parameters were assumed to be probabilistically independent, allowing for efficient parameter ensemble sampling. In an idealized coronary artery geometry, a forward FE model for each parameter ensemble was created to predict tissue stresses under physiologic loading. An emulator was constructed within the UncertainSCI software using polynomial chaos techniques, and statistics and sensitivities were directly computed. Results demonstrated that material parameter uncertainty propagates to variability in predicted stresses across the vessel wall, with the largest dispersions in stress within the adventitial layer. Variability in stress was most sensitive to uncertainties in the anisotropic component of the strain energy function. Unary and binary interactions within the adventitial layer were the main contributors to stress variance, and the leading factor in stress variability was uncertainty in the stress-like material parameter summarizing contribution of the embedded fibers to the overall artery stiffness. Results from a patient-specific coronary model confirmed many of these findings. Collectively, this highlights the impact of material property variation on predicted artery stresses and presents a pipeline to explore and characterize uncertainty in computational biomechanics.
通过不确定性量化分析材料参数变异性对预测冠状动脉生物力学环境的影响
临床采用患者特异性建模策略的核心是证明模拟结果是可靠和安全的。仿真框架必须对模型输入的不确定性具有稳健性,并且结果应具有可信度。在这项研究中,我们采用了不确定性量化-有限元(FE)耦合框架来了解血管材料属性的不确定性对预测应力变化的影响。根据人体冠状动脉组织特定层力学行为测试得出的材料参数拟合了单变量概率分布。假定参数在概率上是独立的,因此可以进行有效的参数集合采样。在理想化的冠状动脉几何形状中,为每个参数集合创建了一个前向 FE 模型,以预测生理负荷下的组织应力。利用多项式混沌技术在 UncertainSCI 软件中构建了一个仿真器,并直接计算了统计量和灵敏度。结果表明,材料参数的不确定性会导致整个血管壁预测应力的变化,其中ventitial层的应力分散最大。应力的变化对应变能函数各向异性分量的不确定性最为敏感。内膜层内的一元和二元相互作用是造成应力变异的主要因素,而应力变异的主要因素是应力样材料参数的不确定性,该参数概括了内嵌纤维对整个动脉刚度的贡献。患者特异性冠状动脉模型的结果证实了上述许多发现。总之,这凸显了材料特性变化对预测动脉应力的影响,并为探索和描述计算生物力学中的不确定性提供了一条途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信