Intimate partner violence in the LGBTQ+ community: Implications for family court professionals

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Lindsey Sank Davis, Emily E. Crain
{"title":"Intimate partner violence in the LGBTQ+ community: Implications for family court professionals","authors":"Lindsey Sank Davis,&nbsp;Emily E. Crain","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) individuals likely experience more intimate partner violence (IPV) than their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts. Though the research on IPV among LGBTQ+ individuals is lacking in quantity, available evidence suggests LGBTQ+ individuals have unique risk factors for IPV victimization and perpetration, express identity-specific reasons for underreporting IPV, and experience types of IPV specific to their sexual orientation and/or gender identities. Bisexual and transgender individuals appear to be at significantly higher risk of IPV victimization compared to their peers. A search of the Family Court Review archives suggests that IPV affecting bisexual parents has never been directly addressed in the publication, nor has IPV affecting transgender or gender-nonconforming parents, and the last article on the topic of IPV in gay and lesbian relationships (Bunker Rohrbaugh, 2006) was published more than 15 years ago when marriage and adoption rights were unavailable to most LGBTQ+ individuals. The current article provides an updated and comprehensive discussion of IPV within the broader LGBTQ+ community, reviews the limitations of the extant literature and the need for more research, and demonstrates that LGBTQ+ IPV is a complex issue with which all family court practitioners should be familiar.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 1","pages":"45-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) individuals likely experience more intimate partner violence (IPV) than their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts. Though the research on IPV among LGBTQ+ individuals is lacking in quantity, available evidence suggests LGBTQ+ individuals have unique risk factors for IPV victimization and perpetration, express identity-specific reasons for underreporting IPV, and experience types of IPV specific to their sexual orientation and/or gender identities. Bisexual and transgender individuals appear to be at significantly higher risk of IPV victimization compared to their peers. A search of the Family Court Review archives suggests that IPV affecting bisexual parents has never been directly addressed in the publication, nor has IPV affecting transgender or gender-nonconforming parents, and the last article on the topic of IPV in gay and lesbian relationships (Bunker Rohrbaugh, 2006) was published more than 15 years ago when marriage and adoption rights were unavailable to most LGBTQ+ individuals. The current article provides an updated and comprehensive discussion of IPV within the broader LGBTQ+ community, reviews the limitations of the extant literature and the need for more research, and demonstrates that LGBTQ+ IPV is a complex issue with which all family court practitioners should be familiar.

LGBTQ+ 群体中的亲密伴侣暴力:对家事法庭专业人员的影响
女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋及其他性取向和性别少数群体(LGBTQ+)可能比他们的同性异性伴侣遭受更多的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)。尽管有关 LGBTQ+ 群体中 IPV 的研究数量不足,但现有证据表明,LGBTQ+ 群体具有独特的 IPV 受害和施暴风险因素,表达了少报 IPV 的特定身份原因,并经历了与其性取向和/或性别身份特定的 IPV 类型。与同龄人相比,双性恋和变性人遭受 IPV 侵害的风险似乎要高得多。对《家事法庭评论》档案的搜索表明,该刊物从未直接讨论过影响双性恋父母的 IPV 问题,也从未讨论过影响变性或性别不符父母的 IPV 问题,而上一篇关于同性恋关系中 IPV 主题的文章(Bunker Rohrbaugh,2006 年)发表于 15 年多以前,当时大多数 LGBTQ+ 人士还没有婚姻和收养权。本文对更广泛的 LGBTQ+ 群体中的 IPV 进行了最新、最全面的讨论,回顾了现有文献的局限性以及开展更多研究的必要性,并表明 LGBTQ+ IPV 是一个复杂的问题,所有家事法庭从业人员都应熟悉这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信