The Effect of Sensory Reweighting on Postural Control and Cortical Activity in Parkinsons Disease

Maryam Sadeghi, Thomas Bristow, Sodiq Fakorede, Ke Liao, Jacqueline A Palmer, Kelly Lyons, Rajesh Pahwa, Chun-Kai Huang, Abiodun Akinwuntan, Hannes Devos
{"title":"The Effect of Sensory Reweighting on Postural Control and Cortical Activity in Parkinsons Disease","authors":"Maryam Sadeghi, Thomas Bristow, Sodiq Fakorede, Ke Liao, Jacqueline A Palmer, Kelly Lyons, Rajesh Pahwa, Chun-Kai Huang, Abiodun Akinwuntan, Hannes Devos","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.26.24301687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\nAims: Balance requires the cortical control of visual, somatosensory, and vestibular inputs. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare the contributions of each of these systems on postural control and cortical activity using a sensory reweighting approach between participants with Parkinsons disease (PD) and controls.\nMethods: Ten participants with PD (age: 72 plus or minus 9; 3 women; Hoehn & Yahr: 2 [1.5 to 2.50]) and 11 controls (age: 70 plus or minus 3; 4 women) completed a sensory organization test in virtual reality (VR-SOT) while cortical activity was being recorded using electroencephalography (EEG). Conditions 1 to 3 were completed on a stable platform; conditions 4 to 6 on a foam. Conditions 1 and 4 were done with eyes open; conditions 2 and 5 in a darkened VR environment; and conditions 3 and 6 in a moving VR environment. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate changes in center of pressure (COP) displacement and EEG alpha and theta/beta ratio power between the two groups across the postural control conditions. Condition 1 was used as reference in all analyses.\nResults: Participants with PD showed greater COP displacement than controls in the anteroposterior (AP) direction when relying on vestibular input (condition 5; p<0.0001). The mediolateral (ML) COP sway was greater in PD than in controls when relying on the somatosensory (condition 2; p = 0.03), visual (condition 4; p = 0.002), and vestibular (condition 5; p < 0.0001) systems. Participants with PD exhibited greater alpha power compared to controls when relying on visual input (condition 2; p = 0.003) and greater theta/beta ratio power when relying on somatosensory input (condition 4; p = 0.001).\nConclusions: PD affects reweighting of postural control, exemplified by greater COP displacement and increased cortical activity. Further research is needed to establish the temporal dynamics between cortical activity and COP displacement.","PeriodicalId":501453,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.26.24301687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aims: Balance requires the cortical control of visual, somatosensory, and vestibular inputs. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare the contributions of each of these systems on postural control and cortical activity using a sensory reweighting approach between participants with Parkinsons disease (PD) and controls. Methods: Ten participants with PD (age: 72 plus or minus 9; 3 women; Hoehn & Yahr: 2 [1.5 to 2.50]) and 11 controls (age: 70 plus or minus 3; 4 women) completed a sensory organization test in virtual reality (VR-SOT) while cortical activity was being recorded using electroencephalography (EEG). Conditions 1 to 3 were completed on a stable platform; conditions 4 to 6 on a foam. Conditions 1 and 4 were done with eyes open; conditions 2 and 5 in a darkened VR environment; and conditions 3 and 6 in a moving VR environment. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate changes in center of pressure (COP) displacement and EEG alpha and theta/beta ratio power between the two groups across the postural control conditions. Condition 1 was used as reference in all analyses. Results: Participants with PD showed greater COP displacement than controls in the anteroposterior (AP) direction when relying on vestibular input (condition 5; p<0.0001). The mediolateral (ML) COP sway was greater in PD than in controls when relying on the somatosensory (condition 2; p = 0.03), visual (condition 4; p = 0.002), and vestibular (condition 5; p < 0.0001) systems. Participants with PD exhibited greater alpha power compared to controls when relying on visual input (condition 2; p = 0.003) and greater theta/beta ratio power when relying on somatosensory input (condition 4; p = 0.001). Conclusions: PD affects reweighting of postural control, exemplified by greater COP displacement and increased cortical activity. Further research is needed to establish the temporal dynamics between cortical activity and COP displacement.
感官复重对帕金森病患者姿势控制和皮层活动的影响
摘要目的:平衡需要大脑皮层对视觉、躯体感觉和前庭输入的控制。这项横断面研究的目的是使用感觉再加权方法,比较帕金森病(PD)患者和对照组患者的这些系统对姿势控制和大脑皮层活动的贡献:10 名帕金森氏症患者(年龄:72 加减 9;3 名女性;Hoehn & Yahr: 2 [1.5 至 2.50])和 11 名对照组患者(年龄:70 加减 3;4 名女性)在使用脑电图(EEG)记录大脑皮层活动的同时,完成了虚拟现实(VR-SOT)中的感觉组织测试。条件 1 至 3 在稳定的平台上完成;条件 4 至 6 在泡沫上完成。条件 1 和 4 是在睁眼的情况下完成的;条件 2 和 5 是在黑暗的 VR 环境中完成的;条件 3 和 6 是在移动的 VR 环境中完成的。采用线性混合模型来评估两组在不同姿势控制条件下压力中心(COP)位移和脑电图阿尔法和θ/β比值功率的变化。所有分析均以条件 1 为参照:结果:当依赖前庭输入时,与对照组相比,帕金森病患者在前胸(AP)方向表现出更大的 COP 位移(条件 5;p<0.0001)。在依靠体感(条件 2;p = 0.03)、视觉(条件 4;p = 0.002)和前庭(条件 5;p <;0.0001)系统时,帕金森病患者的 COP 内外侧(ML)摇摆比对照组更大。与对照组相比,帕金森病患者在依赖视觉输入时(条件 2;p = 0.003)表现出更大的α功率,在依赖体感输入时(条件 4;p = 0.001)表现出更大的θ/β比率功率:结论:脊髓灰质炎会影响姿势控制的重新加权,表现为更大的 COP 位移和皮质活动增加。需要进一步研究以确定皮质活动和 COP 位移之间的时间动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信