Poor reproductive performance of Least Terns after tropical cyclones in Mississippi USA suggests delayed nesting seriously reduces colony productivity

Abigail J Darrah
{"title":"Poor reproductive performance of Least Terns after tropical cyclones in Mississippi USA suggests delayed nesting seriously reduces colony productivity","authors":"Abigail J Darrah","doi":"10.1093/ornithapp/duae003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coastal birds that rely on sandy beaches for breeding are vulnerable to catastrophic flooding events resulting from tropical cyclones. The effects of storm surge on annual productivity depend on the propensity and success of renesting attempts post-storm. From 2017 to 2021, I investigated the effects of storm surge on Least Tern (Sternula antillarum) annual productivity, renesting probability, and nest and chick survival after storms on Mississippi’s Gulf of Mexico Coast. Tropical cyclones made landfall during peak breeding period in 3 of these years, resulting in complete overwash of all colonies. Observers monitored daily nest survival, productivity (maximum fledge count per maximum nest count), and frequency of disturbance from avian predators at each colony. Total annual productivity (fledge count per nest count across the study area) summed across colonies ranged from 0.00 to 0.07 in storm years and from 0.29 to 0.66 in non-storm years. Probability of colony re-occupation declined as a function of storm date and increased with pre-storm nest success. Disturbance rate from avian predators did not increase post-storm compared to pre-storm periods. Nest survival increased with colony size and decreased in both late-season (non-storm) and post-storm time periods. Mean probability of chick survival was 0.20 ± 0.06 (mean ± SD) for peak nesting period in non-storm years, whereas mean predicted chick survival was 0.003–0.004 in storm years and in renesting periods in all years. Storm surge resulted in nearly complete loss of Least Tern breeding productivity despite renesting attempts and colony re-occupation after storms. I found no evidence that avian predation increased post-storm as a result of habitat changes; rather, similarly low productivity was observed for late-season breeding attempts in non-storm years. Repeated storm surge events could pose a serious threat to the viability of Mississippi’s coastal-nesting Least Tern population, and protection of Least Terns during early and peak nesting seasons is critical for ensuring breeding success.","PeriodicalId":501493,"journal":{"name":"The Condor: Ornithological Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Condor: Ornithological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duae003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal birds that rely on sandy beaches for breeding are vulnerable to catastrophic flooding events resulting from tropical cyclones. The effects of storm surge on annual productivity depend on the propensity and success of renesting attempts post-storm. From 2017 to 2021, I investigated the effects of storm surge on Least Tern (Sternula antillarum) annual productivity, renesting probability, and nest and chick survival after storms on Mississippi’s Gulf of Mexico Coast. Tropical cyclones made landfall during peak breeding period in 3 of these years, resulting in complete overwash of all colonies. Observers monitored daily nest survival, productivity (maximum fledge count per maximum nest count), and frequency of disturbance from avian predators at each colony. Total annual productivity (fledge count per nest count across the study area) summed across colonies ranged from 0.00 to 0.07 in storm years and from 0.29 to 0.66 in non-storm years. Probability of colony re-occupation declined as a function of storm date and increased with pre-storm nest success. Disturbance rate from avian predators did not increase post-storm compared to pre-storm periods. Nest survival increased with colony size and decreased in both late-season (non-storm) and post-storm time periods. Mean probability of chick survival was 0.20 ± 0.06 (mean ± SD) for peak nesting period in non-storm years, whereas mean predicted chick survival was 0.003–0.004 in storm years and in renesting periods in all years. Storm surge resulted in nearly complete loss of Least Tern breeding productivity despite renesting attempts and colony re-occupation after storms. I found no evidence that avian predation increased post-storm as a result of habitat changes; rather, similarly low productivity was observed for late-season breeding attempts in non-storm years. Repeated storm surge events could pose a serious threat to the viability of Mississippi’s coastal-nesting Least Tern population, and protection of Least Terns during early and peak nesting seasons is critical for ensuring breeding success.
美国密西西比州热带气旋过后最矮燕鸥的繁殖表现不佳,表明延迟筑巢会严重降低鸟群的生产力
依靠沙滩繁殖的沿海鸟类很容易受到热带气旋造成的灾难性洪水事件的影响。风暴潮对年生产力的影响取决于风暴后重新筑巢的倾向和成功率。从 2017 年到 2021 年,我调查了风暴潮对密西西比墨西哥湾沿岸燕鸥(Sternula antillarum)年生产力、重新归巢概率以及风暴后巢穴和雏鸟存活率的影响。其中有 3 年,热带气旋在繁殖高峰期登陆,导致所有繁殖地被完全冲毁。观察人员监测了每个繁殖地每天的巢存活率、生产率(每最大巢数的最大羽数)以及鸟类捕食者的干扰频率。在暴风雨年,各群落的年总生产率(整个研究区域每个巢的育雏数)从 0.00 到 0.07 不等,而在非暴风雨年则从 0.29 到 0.66 不等。鸟群重新占领的概率随暴风雨日期而下降,随暴风雨前筑巢成功率而上升。与暴风雨前相比,暴风雨后鸟类捕食者的干扰率没有增加。巢的存活率随着巢群大小的增加而增加,并在晚季(非暴风雨期间)和暴风雨后时期都有所下降。在非风暴年的筑巢高峰期,雏鸟存活的平均概率为 0.20 ± 0.06(平均 ± SD),而在风暴年和所有年份的重新筑巢期,雏鸟存活的平均预测概率为 0.003-0.004。风暴潮导致燕鸥的繁殖生产力几乎完全丧失,尽管它们在风暴后尝试重新筑巢并重新占领巢穴。我没有发现风暴后鸟类捕食量因栖息地变化而增加的证据;相反,在非风暴年的晚季繁殖尝试中也观察到了类似的低生产力。反复发生的风暴潮事件可能会严重威胁密西西比沿海筑巢燕鸥种群的生存能力,在筑巢初期和高峰期保护燕鸥对确保繁殖成功至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信