Child and Parent Risk and Resilience Factors as Predictors of Long-term Recovery in Youth Undergoing Spinal Fusion Surgery.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jenny Thorsell Cederberg, Sara Laureen Bartels, Måns Thulin, Melanie Beeckman, Rikard K Wicksell, Liesbet Goubert
{"title":"Child and Parent Risk and Resilience Factors as Predictors of Long-term Recovery in Youth Undergoing Spinal Fusion Surgery.","authors":"Jenny Thorsell Cederberg, Sara Laureen Bartels, Måns Thulin, Melanie Beeckman, Rikard K Wicksell, Liesbet Goubert","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Undertreated pediatric postsurgical pain negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functioning and may lead to chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). Predictors of recovery have been identified but more research is needed, particularly regarding resilience, social factors, and long-term effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate child and parent risk and resilience factors as predictors of long-term postsurgical recovery for adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), 12 to 18 years old, undergoing spinal fusion, and their parents. Recruitment occurred at the orthopedic units at 4 hospitals in Belgium. Data were collected before surgery (T0), at 3 (T1) and 6 weeks (T2), 6 months (T3), and 1 year (T4) post surgery. Multiple regression models were used to evaluate the predictive effect of pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, psychological flexibility, and pain acceptance on long-term functioning, HRQOL, and pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 100 adolescents and 61 parents. Pain at T0, T1, and T3 and adolescent pain catastrophizing (T0) predicted health-related quality of life, functioning, and pain at T4 (while pain at T2 predicted HRQOL and pain). Parent pain catastrophizing predicted pain at T4. Adolescent and parental psychological flexibility predicted HRQOL, and parent psychological flexibility also predicted pain at T4. Adolescent acceptance at T1 predicted pain, and acceptance at T2 predicted HRQOL, at T4.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study identified pain and adolescent pain catastrophizing as risk factors, and adolescent and parental psychological flexibility and adolescent pain acceptance as resilience factors, for long-term recovery in youths undergoing spinal fusion. Postsurgical pain management targeting these factors may therefore promote recovery for these adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"278-287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11005675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Undertreated pediatric postsurgical pain negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functioning and may lead to chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). Predictors of recovery have been identified but more research is needed, particularly regarding resilience, social factors, and long-term effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate child and parent risk and resilience factors as predictors of long-term postsurgical recovery for adolescents.

Methods: Participants were patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), 12 to 18 years old, undergoing spinal fusion, and their parents. Recruitment occurred at the orthopedic units at 4 hospitals in Belgium. Data were collected before surgery (T0), at 3 (T1) and 6 weeks (T2), 6 months (T3), and 1 year (T4) post surgery. Multiple regression models were used to evaluate the predictive effect of pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, psychological flexibility, and pain acceptance on long-term functioning, HRQOL, and pain.

Results: The sample comprised 100 adolescents and 61 parents. Pain at T0, T1, and T3 and adolescent pain catastrophizing (T0) predicted health-related quality of life, functioning, and pain at T4 (while pain at T2 predicted HRQOL and pain). Parent pain catastrophizing predicted pain at T4. Adolescent and parental psychological flexibility predicted HRQOL, and parent psychological flexibility also predicted pain at T4. Adolescent acceptance at T1 predicted pain, and acceptance at T2 predicted HRQOL, at T4.

Discussion: The study identified pain and adolescent pain catastrophizing as risk factors, and adolescent and parental psychological flexibility and adolescent pain acceptance as resilience factors, for long-term recovery in youths undergoing spinal fusion. Postsurgical pain management targeting these factors may therefore promote recovery for these adolescents.

接受脊柱融合手术的青少年长期康复的预测因素--儿童和家长的风险与复原力因素。
目的:小儿手术后疼痛治疗不足会对生活质量和功能产生负面影响,并可能导致慢性手术后疼痛(CPSP)。目前已经确定了康复的预测因素,但还需要进行更多的研究,尤其是关于恢复能力、社会因素和长期影响的研究。本研究旨在调查作为青少年手术后长期康复预测因素的儿童和家长风险及复原力因素:参与者为12-18岁接受脊柱融合手术的青少年特发性脊柱侧弯症(AIS)患者及其父母。招募工作在比利时四家医院的骨科进行。数据收集于手术前(T0)、手术后三周(T1)、六周(T2)、六个月(T3)和一年(T4)。采用多元回归模型评估了疼痛强度、疼痛灾难化、心理灵活性和疼痛接受度对长期功能、生活质量和疼痛的预测作用:样本包括 100 名青少年和 61 名家长。T0、T1和T3时的疼痛以及青少年的疼痛灾难化(T0)预测了T4时的生活质量、功能和疼痛(而T2时的疼痛预测了生活质量和疼痛)。父母的疼痛灾难化预测了T4时的疼痛。青少年和父母的心理灵活性可预测生活质量,父母的心理灵活性也可预测 T4 时的疼痛。青少年在T1阶段对疼痛的接受度可预测T4阶段的疼痛,在T2阶段对疼痛的接受度可预测T4阶段的生活质量:该研究发现,疼痛和青少年疼痛灾难化是脊柱融合术后青少年长期康复的风险因素,而青少年和父母的心理灵活性以及青少年对疼痛的接受程度则是恢复因素。因此,针对这些因素的术后疼痛管理可促进这些青少年的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信