Additive value of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block and serratus anterior plane block in lung transplantation surgery: a retrospective exploratory study.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Karam Azem, Shai Fein, Benjamin Zribi, Daniel Iluz-Freundlich, Ido Neuman, Michal Y Livne, Omer Kaplan, Roussana Aranbitski, Philip Heesen, Liran Statlender, Dan Gorfil, Yaron Barac, Yuri Peysakhovich, Eitan Mangoubi
{"title":"Additive value of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block and serratus anterior plane block in lung transplantation surgery: a retrospective exploratory study.","authors":"Karam Azem, Shai Fein, Benjamin Zribi, Daniel Iluz-Freundlich, Ido Neuman, Michal Y Livne, Omer Kaplan, Roussana Aranbitski, Philip Heesen, Liran Statlender, Dan Gorfil, Yaron Barac, Yuri Peysakhovich, Eitan Mangoubi","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-105137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate pain control following lung transplantation (LTx) surgery is paramount. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the gold standard; however, the potential use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and consequent anticoagulation therapy raises safety concerns, prompting clinicians to seek safer alternatives. The utility of thoracic wall blocks in general thoracic surgery is well established; however, their role in the context of LTx has been poorly investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective exploratory study, we assessed the effect of adding a superficial parasternal intercostal plane (sPIP) block and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block to standard anesthetic and analgesic care on tracheal extubation rates, pain scores and opioid consumption until 72 hours postoperatively in LTx.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients were included in the analysis; 35 received the standard anesthetic and analgesic care (control group), and 25 received sPIP and SAP blocks in addition to the standard anesthetic and analgesic care (intervention group). We observed higher tracheal extubation rates in the intervention group at 8 hours postoperatively (16.0% vs 0.0%, p=0.03). This was also shown after adjusting for known prognostic factors (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.33, p=0.02). Furthermore, we noted a lower opioid consumption measured by morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours in the intervention group (median 405 (IQR 300-490) vs 266 (IQR 168-366), p=0.02). This was also found after adjusting for known prognostic factors (β -118; 95% CI -221 to 14, p=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>sPIP and SAP blocks are safe regional analgesic techniques in LTx involving ECMO and clamshell incision. They are associated with faster tracheal extubation and lower opioid consumption. These techniques should be considered when TEA is not appropriate. Further high-quality studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"324-330"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-105137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adequate pain control following lung transplantation (LTx) surgery is paramount. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the gold standard; however, the potential use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and consequent anticoagulation therapy raises safety concerns, prompting clinicians to seek safer alternatives. The utility of thoracic wall blocks in general thoracic surgery is well established; however, their role in the context of LTx has been poorly investigated.

Methods: In this retrospective exploratory study, we assessed the effect of adding a superficial parasternal intercostal plane (sPIP) block and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block to standard anesthetic and analgesic care on tracheal extubation rates, pain scores and opioid consumption until 72 hours postoperatively in LTx.

Results: Sixty patients were included in the analysis; 35 received the standard anesthetic and analgesic care (control group), and 25 received sPIP and SAP blocks in addition to the standard anesthetic and analgesic care (intervention group). We observed higher tracheal extubation rates in the intervention group at 8 hours postoperatively (16.0% vs 0.0%, p=0.03). This was also shown after adjusting for known prognostic factors (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.33, p=0.02). Furthermore, we noted a lower opioid consumption measured by morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours in the intervention group (median 405 (IQR 300-490) vs 266 (IQR 168-366), p=0.02). This was also found after adjusting for known prognostic factors (β -118; 95% CI -221 to 14, p=0.03).

Conclusion: sPIP and SAP blocks are safe regional analgesic techniques in LTx involving ECMO and clamshell incision. They are associated with faster tracheal extubation and lower opioid consumption. These techniques should be considered when TEA is not appropriate. Further high-quality studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

肺移植手术中胸骨旁肋间浅层阻滞和前锯肌平面阻滞的附加价值:一项回顾性探索研究。
背景:肺移植(LTx)手术后充分控制疼痛至关重要。胸腔硬膜外镇痛(TEA)是黄金标准;然而,体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的潜在使用和随之而来的抗凝治疗引发了安全问题,促使临床医生寻求更安全的替代方法。胸壁阻滞在普通胸外科手术中的作用已得到公认,但其在LTx中的作用却鲜有研究:在这项回顾性探索研究中,我们评估了在标准麻醉和镇痛护理基础上增加胸骨旁肋间浅层(sPIP)阻滞和前锯肌平面(SAP)阻滞对气管拔管率、疼痛评分和术后 72 小时前阿片类药物消耗量的影响:60名患者被纳入分析,其中35人接受了标准麻醉和镇痛护理(对照组),25人在标准麻醉和镇痛护理的基础上接受了sPIP和SAP阻滞(干预组)。我们观察到,干预组术后 8 小时的气管插管率更高(16.0% 对 0.0%,P=0.03)。在对已知预后因素进行调整后,结果也是如此(OR 1.18;95% CI 1.04 至 1.33,P=0.02)。此外,我们还注意到,干预组 24 小时内按吗啡毫克当量计算的阿片类药物消耗量较低(中位数 405(IQR 300-490) vs 266(IQR 168-366),P=0.02)。结论:sPIP 和 SAP 阻滞是涉及 ECMO 和蛤壳切口的 LTx 中安全的区域镇痛技术。结论:SPIP 和 SAP 阻滞是涉及 ECMO 和clamshell 切口的 LTx 中安全的区域镇痛技术,可加快气管拔管并降低阿片类药物的用量。当不适合使用 TEA 时,应考虑使用这些技术。有必要进一步开展高质量的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信