The Meldrewfication of Mick

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Mick McKeown
{"title":"The Meldrewfication of Mick","authors":"Mick McKeown","doi":"10.1111/jpm.13029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In relatively recent times key aspects of society have without doubt been insidiously changing for the worse. Some time ago George Ritzer (<span>1993</span>) drew our attention to a process of McDonaldisation, whereby expanding aspects of our social realm and experience are degraded by forces of rationalization mirroring the organization of fast-food restaurants. Two decades later David Graeber (<span>2013</span>) argued persuasively that the world of work under neoliberal capitalism is increasingly characterized by bullshit or pointless jobs, and the vulnerability of other occupations to a creeping bullshitisation, squeezing out the meaning and fulfilment in our work. I have argued that not even nursing work is immune to these disheartening tendencies, and advances of artificial intelligence might accelerate the detriment (McKeown, <span>2023</span>). More recently, Yanis Varoufakis (<span>2023</span>) has put the spotlight on Techno Feudalism: how modern capitalism is being overtaken by new modes of serfdom, with huge concentrations of wealth and power amongst a few hyper-rich individuals predicated on new technologies. All of these changes are hugely detrimental for human well-being and democracy.</p><p>My career as a nurse has traversed the same timeline as these negative developments in the character of our society and political economy. In this time, I have noticed some parallel changes in my own character. Primarily, I find myself being increasingly vexed by things that happen or that I see around me. This vexation can be accompanied by anger and irritation, sometimes by sadness or even despair, and the overriding impulse is, typically, massive incredulity often expressed in sarcastic outbursts or shaking of head in disbelief. I find myself shouting at the TV set, losing patience with friends, family and colleagues, and don't even get me started about social media content. The person I now seemingly resemble is Victor Meldrew.</p><p>Victor was the main character in the old BBC sitcom ‘One Foot in the Grave’. He was most notable for his frequent and disapproving utterance of an exasperated catchphrase ‘I don't believe it!’. He is perpetually pained by the seemingly unbelievable nature of some people's behaviours, particular happenstances, or events he finds himself wrapped up in. Victor's wider expressive repertoire included other such declamations as ‘in the name of sanity!’, the exaggeratedly stretched out ‘Un-be-lieeeevable!’, or the more pointed, ‘Bloody Hell!’.</p><p>Though plenty of people who know me well say I have always been like this, I think my Meldrew tendencies are getting worse, and increasingly so in recent times. In conversations with others, I believe that I am not alone in this regard. This is so much the case that I think we can arguably make a case that mine and others' increasingly psycho-emotional tendency for critical astonishment can be appropriately named as a process of <i>Meldrewfication</i>. And the escalation of this has gathered pace with, and is inextricably linked to, experiences under neoliberalism and the aforementioned shifts in social structures and relations pointed out by Ritzer, Graeber, Varoufakis and other critical commentators.</p><p>Hence, for me, exposure on an almost daily basis to the deficiencies of government policy and associated ministerial pronouncements on (variously but not exclusively) austerity, tax and benefits, immigration, homelessness, or the complete failure of private administration of public goods prompt an atavistic squeal of ‘I don't believe it’! The couldn't make it up shenanigans concerning, amongst other things: raw sewage in our rivers, the cost of living crisis (compounded by years of austerity, the disastrous Brexit ‘dividend’ and kamikaze management of the economy), endemic poverty and the proliferation of foodbanks, eye-watering energy price inflation, the demonisation and floating incarceration of asylum seekers (negligent of fire or Legionella contagion risks), and the scandal of the immoral and illegal Rwanda policy (a ‘hostile environment’ indeed), the war on the poor (including stigmatization and denigration of benefit claimants along with sanctions, conditionality/work capability assessments), occurring against a backdrop of pigs at a trough governmental venality, corruption and incompetence …. All these and more precipitate a resounding ‘Un-be-lieeeevable!’</p><p>So, what has any of this got to do with nursing? Well, I reserve peak-Meldrew for health service related issues, especially regarding mental health care, and recognizing these are not at all independent of the damage caused by much of the above. The aforementioned inadequacies of government thus extend crucially into health and mental health domains. More specifically to health care, we have: the catastrophic failings of the Covid crisis (from PPE procurement scandals to letting the bodies pile up), the woeful absence any strategic thinking on social care, the abject underfunding and mismanagement of the NHS, the nursing and wider workforce recruitment and retention crisis, the undervaluing of staff and corollary entrenched lack of appropriate remuneration … in the name of sanity! And even more particularly about mental health: the creeping genericisation of nurse training, and the excessively coercive character of mental health care under neoliberalism, with corollary harms to patients and alienation for nurses … Bloody Hell!</p><p>Seriously, there is much to be exasperated about, and our collective capacity to deal with all of this is being tested to the limit. That's even before we factor in the other major existential threats that afflict the planet, humankind and the rest of nature – notably impending climate catastrophe, the grossly unfair distribution of economic injustices, and the horrendous persistence of militarism, notably immediately evident in Ukraine and Gaza, but also numerous almost forgotten conflicts across the globe, where typically non-combatants face the brunt of the misery, destruction and death. The fact that this is often prosecuted using high grade military hardware manufactured in the west, with the approval of governments committed to austerity at home, is a further twist of the Meldrewfying knife.</p><p>I have noted the fact that for Meldrews there is a complex of responses to vexatious phenomena, combining incredulity, exasperation, irritation/anger and despair. Various commentators over the years have noted the propensity of features of the neoliberal order to provoke such emotions and attendant anxieties, and argue persuasively that much of what gets signified as mental illness might well be fomented in this social-political-economic tumult. Mark Fisher (<span>2009</span>), famously made this point and noted how people could quite readily accommodate themselves to such a state of affairs, taking the neoliberal order for granted as something that has settled out as normal, rather than realizing the potential for resistance. Of course, resisting this deleterious, pathological social order is not only possible, it is urgent that such resistance is organized for; and that is the point of this short article. Various nursing activist-practitioners and scholars have formulated similar arguments (see Dillard-Wright et al., <span>2022</span>). Perhaps, acknowledging and embracing incipient, emerging or full-blown Meldrewfication is one way to enter into a path to resistance. Furthermore, not doing so might actually be harmful for individual or collective well-being; if the psychic tensions of Medrewfication are not afforded some sort of positive outlet. Simply stewing in exasperation and frustration would be no good at all, but maybe we need to feel affronted, appalled, upset or angry about things in order to prompt action. Radical responses may be channelled into many forms of activism and organizing and can include situated, relational and, indeed, loving approaches (Collier-Sewell &amp; Melino, <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Elsewhere, along with others, I have argued that nurses ought to become more active in movements for change (McKeown, <span>2019</span>). This can start in the workplace, with membership of trade unions and associated political parties (though some of the democratic deficits of these can also provoke the Meldrew in me from time to time). Similarly, nurses can engage in wider community or health related activism in a range of community groups and new social movements, and these nurses may be able to forge progressive links and alliances back into workforce focused activism (Glascott &amp; McKeown, <span>2022</span>; McKeown &amp; Spandler, <span>2015</span>). Though a comedic character who may often just be thought of as an archetypal grumpy old man, it is plausible that Victor's frustrations and impatience with life's mundane vicissitudes actually reflect a deeper moral and humane concern for society and its perceived wrongs. Interestingly, Victor himself began his career as a curmudgeon on being made redundant from his job; a clear demonstration that Meldrewfication is arguably commensurate with acute sensitivity to injustice, and that realizing this can often begin within the workplace. That said, Victor's dissatisfaction with the world could tend to a fatalistic pessimism. In one scene he remarks: ‘one thing you can be sure about in life: just when you think that things are never ever going to get better, they suddenly get worse’. It is crucial that we resist such fatalism by embracing the optimism and hope for better futures that is inevitably bound up with actively seeking and organizing for change.</p><p>Nurses might do well to begin this organizing imperative within their workplaces, noting the various injustices of their employment relations, and go on to imaginatively build upon recognition of other serial injustices that plague the social context they work in; not least the disempowerment and abuses heaped upon those who use, survive or refuse to use mental health services. We need to build peace and justice in the world and we need to pacify relations between staff and patients within more just mental health services. Can we as nurses achieve this? As Victor may have once said: ‘you better believe it!’</p>","PeriodicalId":50076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpm.13029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpm.13029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In relatively recent times key aspects of society have without doubt been insidiously changing for the worse. Some time ago George Ritzer (1993) drew our attention to a process of McDonaldisation, whereby expanding aspects of our social realm and experience are degraded by forces of rationalization mirroring the organization of fast-food restaurants. Two decades later David Graeber (2013) argued persuasively that the world of work under neoliberal capitalism is increasingly characterized by bullshit or pointless jobs, and the vulnerability of other occupations to a creeping bullshitisation, squeezing out the meaning and fulfilment in our work. I have argued that not even nursing work is immune to these disheartening tendencies, and advances of artificial intelligence might accelerate the detriment (McKeown, 2023). More recently, Yanis Varoufakis (2023) has put the spotlight on Techno Feudalism: how modern capitalism is being overtaken by new modes of serfdom, with huge concentrations of wealth and power amongst a few hyper-rich individuals predicated on new technologies. All of these changes are hugely detrimental for human well-being and democracy.

My career as a nurse has traversed the same timeline as these negative developments in the character of our society and political economy. In this time, I have noticed some parallel changes in my own character. Primarily, I find myself being increasingly vexed by things that happen or that I see around me. This vexation can be accompanied by anger and irritation, sometimes by sadness or even despair, and the overriding impulse is, typically, massive incredulity often expressed in sarcastic outbursts or shaking of head in disbelief. I find myself shouting at the TV set, losing patience with friends, family and colleagues, and don't even get me started about social media content. The person I now seemingly resemble is Victor Meldrew.

Victor was the main character in the old BBC sitcom ‘One Foot in the Grave’. He was most notable for his frequent and disapproving utterance of an exasperated catchphrase ‘I don't believe it!’. He is perpetually pained by the seemingly unbelievable nature of some people's behaviours, particular happenstances, or events he finds himself wrapped up in. Victor's wider expressive repertoire included other such declamations as ‘in the name of sanity!’, the exaggeratedly stretched out ‘Un-be-lieeeevable!’, or the more pointed, ‘Bloody Hell!’.

Though plenty of people who know me well say I have always been like this, I think my Meldrew tendencies are getting worse, and increasingly so in recent times. In conversations with others, I believe that I am not alone in this regard. This is so much the case that I think we can arguably make a case that mine and others' increasingly psycho-emotional tendency for critical astonishment can be appropriately named as a process of Meldrewfication. And the escalation of this has gathered pace with, and is inextricably linked to, experiences under neoliberalism and the aforementioned shifts in social structures and relations pointed out by Ritzer, Graeber, Varoufakis and other critical commentators.

Hence, for me, exposure on an almost daily basis to the deficiencies of government policy and associated ministerial pronouncements on (variously but not exclusively) austerity, tax and benefits, immigration, homelessness, or the complete failure of private administration of public goods prompt an atavistic squeal of ‘I don't believe it’! The couldn't make it up shenanigans concerning, amongst other things: raw sewage in our rivers, the cost of living crisis (compounded by years of austerity, the disastrous Brexit ‘dividend’ and kamikaze management of the economy), endemic poverty and the proliferation of foodbanks, eye-watering energy price inflation, the demonisation and floating incarceration of asylum seekers (negligent of fire or Legionella contagion risks), and the scandal of the immoral and illegal Rwanda policy (a ‘hostile environment’ indeed), the war on the poor (including stigmatization and denigration of benefit claimants along with sanctions, conditionality/work capability assessments), occurring against a backdrop of pigs at a trough governmental venality, corruption and incompetence …. All these and more precipitate a resounding ‘Un-be-lieeeevable!’

So, what has any of this got to do with nursing? Well, I reserve peak-Meldrew for health service related issues, especially regarding mental health care, and recognizing these are not at all independent of the damage caused by much of the above. The aforementioned inadequacies of government thus extend crucially into health and mental health domains. More specifically to health care, we have: the catastrophic failings of the Covid crisis (from PPE procurement scandals to letting the bodies pile up), the woeful absence any strategic thinking on social care, the abject underfunding and mismanagement of the NHS, the nursing and wider workforce recruitment and retention crisis, the undervaluing of staff and corollary entrenched lack of appropriate remuneration … in the name of sanity! And even more particularly about mental health: the creeping genericisation of nurse training, and the excessively coercive character of mental health care under neoliberalism, with corollary harms to patients and alienation for nurses … Bloody Hell!

Seriously, there is much to be exasperated about, and our collective capacity to deal with all of this is being tested to the limit. That's even before we factor in the other major existential threats that afflict the planet, humankind and the rest of nature – notably impending climate catastrophe, the grossly unfair distribution of economic injustices, and the horrendous persistence of militarism, notably immediately evident in Ukraine and Gaza, but also numerous almost forgotten conflicts across the globe, where typically non-combatants face the brunt of the misery, destruction and death. The fact that this is often prosecuted using high grade military hardware manufactured in the west, with the approval of governments committed to austerity at home, is a further twist of the Meldrewfying knife.

I have noted the fact that for Meldrews there is a complex of responses to vexatious phenomena, combining incredulity, exasperation, irritation/anger and despair. Various commentators over the years have noted the propensity of features of the neoliberal order to provoke such emotions and attendant anxieties, and argue persuasively that much of what gets signified as mental illness might well be fomented in this social-political-economic tumult. Mark Fisher (2009), famously made this point and noted how people could quite readily accommodate themselves to such a state of affairs, taking the neoliberal order for granted as something that has settled out as normal, rather than realizing the potential for resistance. Of course, resisting this deleterious, pathological social order is not only possible, it is urgent that such resistance is organized for; and that is the point of this short article. Various nursing activist-practitioners and scholars have formulated similar arguments (see Dillard-Wright et al., 2022). Perhaps, acknowledging and embracing incipient, emerging or full-blown Meldrewfication is one way to enter into a path to resistance. Furthermore, not doing so might actually be harmful for individual or collective well-being; if the psychic tensions of Medrewfication are not afforded some sort of positive outlet. Simply stewing in exasperation and frustration would be no good at all, but maybe we need to feel affronted, appalled, upset or angry about things in order to prompt action. Radical responses may be channelled into many forms of activism and organizing and can include situated, relational and, indeed, loving approaches (Collier-Sewell & Melino, 2023).

Elsewhere, along with others, I have argued that nurses ought to become more active in movements for change (McKeown, 2019). This can start in the workplace, with membership of trade unions and associated political parties (though some of the democratic deficits of these can also provoke the Meldrew in me from time to time). Similarly, nurses can engage in wider community or health related activism in a range of community groups and new social movements, and these nurses may be able to forge progressive links and alliances back into workforce focused activism (Glascott & McKeown, 2022; McKeown & Spandler, 2015). Though a comedic character who may often just be thought of as an archetypal grumpy old man, it is plausible that Victor's frustrations and impatience with life's mundane vicissitudes actually reflect a deeper moral and humane concern for society and its perceived wrongs. Interestingly, Victor himself began his career as a curmudgeon on being made redundant from his job; a clear demonstration that Meldrewfication is arguably commensurate with acute sensitivity to injustice, and that realizing this can often begin within the workplace. That said, Victor's dissatisfaction with the world could tend to a fatalistic pessimism. In one scene he remarks: ‘one thing you can be sure about in life: just when you think that things are never ever going to get better, they suddenly get worse’. It is crucial that we resist such fatalism by embracing the optimism and hope for better futures that is inevitably bound up with actively seeking and organizing for change.

Nurses might do well to begin this organizing imperative within their workplaces, noting the various injustices of their employment relations, and go on to imaginatively build upon recognition of other serial injustices that plague the social context they work in; not least the disempowerment and abuses heaped upon those who use, survive or refuse to use mental health services. We need to build peace and justice in the world and we need to pacify relations between staff and patients within more just mental health services. Can we as nurses achieve this? As Victor may have once said: ‘you better believe it!’

米克的融合。
具体到医疗保健领域,我们有:科维德危机的灾难性失败(从个人防护设备采购丑闻到任由尸体堆积)、社会医疗保健战略思考的严重缺失、国家医疗服务体系的严重资金不足和管理不善、护理及更广泛的劳动力招聘和保留危机、低估员工价值以及随之而来的根深蒂固的缺乏适当报酬的问题......以理智的名义!尤其是在精神健康方面:护士培训的逐步通用化,新自由主义下精神健康护理的过度强制性,以及随之而来的对病人的伤害和对护士的疏远......真是见鬼了!说真的,有很多事情值得我们气愤,我们处理所有这些事情的集体能力正在经受着极限考验。这还没算上困扰地球、人类和大自然的其他重大生存威胁--尤其是即将到来的气候灾难、严重不公平的经济不公正分配,以及军国主义的可怕顽固性,尤其是在乌克兰和加沙,以及全球无数几乎被遗忘的冲突中,非战斗人员通常首当其冲地承受着苦难、破坏和死亡。在这些冲突中,非战斗人员通常首当其冲地面临着苦难、破坏和死亡。事实上,这些冲突往往是在西方国家制造的高级军事装备的支持下进行的,而这些装备又得到了国内致力于紧缩政策的政府的批准,这也是梅德鲁夫的刀子的另一个转折点。我注意到这样一个事实,即对于梅德鲁夫来说,对令人烦恼的现象会有一系列复杂的反应,包括难以置信、气愤、恼怒/愤怒和绝望。多年来,许多评论家都注意到,新自由主义秩序的特征很容易激起这些情绪和随之而来的焦虑,并有说服力地指出,许多被视为精神疾病的东西很可能就是在这种社会-政治-经济动荡中滋生的。马克-费舍尔(Mark Fisher,2009 年)提出了这一著名观点,并指出人们如何能够轻易地适应这种状态,将新自由主义秩序视为理所当然的正常现象,而不是意识到反抗的潜力。当然,抵制这种有害的、病态的社会秩序不仅是可能的,而且迫切需要组织这种抵制;这就是这篇短文的重点。许多护理活动家和学者都提出了类似的论点(见 Dillard-Wright 等人,2022 年)。也许,承认并接受萌芽的、新出现的或全面爆发的 Meldrewfication 是进入抵抗之路的一种方式。此外,如果不这样做,可能实际上会对个人或集体的福祉造成伤害;如果 Medrewfication 的精神紧张得不到某种积极的宣泄。单纯地沉浸在愤懑和沮丧中是没有任何好处的,但也许我们需要对某些事情感到愤怒、讶异、不安或生气,这样才能促使我们采取行动。激进的反应可以被引导到多种形式的行动主义和组织活动中,可以包括情景式、关系式,甚至是爱的方式(Collier-Sewell &amp; Melino, 2023)。在其他地方,我和其他人一起认为,护士应该更加积极地参与变革运动(McKeown, 2019)。这可以从工作场所开始,加入工会和相关政党(尽管其中的一些民主缺陷也会不时激起我心中的梅德鲁)。同样,护士可以在一系列社区团体和新社会运动中参与更广泛的社区或与健康相关的活动,这些护士可能能够建立进步的联系和联盟,回到以劳动力为重点的活动中(Glascott &amp; McKeown, 2022; McKeown &amp; Spandler, 2015)。虽然维克多是一个喜剧人物,通常被认为是一个典型的脾气暴躁的老人,但维克多对世俗沧桑的沮丧和不耐烦实际上反映了对社会及其所认为的错误的更深层次的道德和人文关怀,这一点是可信的。有趣的是,维克多本人在被裁员后就开始了他的 "老顽固 "生涯;这清楚地表明,"老顽固 "可以说与对不公正现象的敏锐洞察力是相称的,而认识到这一点往往可以从工作场所开始。尽管如此,维克多对世界的不满可能会倾向于宿命论式的悲观主义。在一个场景中,他说:"在生活中有一件事是可以肯定的:当你认为事情永远不会变好的时候,事情会突然变得更糟"。我们必须抵制这种宿命论,拥抱乐观主义和对美好未来的希望,这与积极寻求和组织改变是不可避免的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing is an international journal which publishes research and scholarly papers that advance the development of policy, practice, research and education in all aspects of mental health nursing. We publish rigorously conducted research, literature reviews, essays and debates, and consumer practitioner narratives; all of which add new knowledge and advance practice globally. All papers must have clear implications for mental health nursing either solely or part of multidisciplinary practice. Papers are welcomed which draw on single or multiple research and academic disciplines. We give space to practitioner and consumer perspectives and ensure research published in the journal can be understood by a wide audience. We encourage critical debate and exchange of ideas and therefore welcome letters to the editor and essays and debates in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信