Impact of as Needed Heparin Boluses on Supratherapeutic Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time in Patients Managed With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Q3 Medicine
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1097/HPC.0000000000000347
Delaney M Corcoran, Mary P Kovacevic, Heather Dell'Orfano, Katelyn W Sylvester, Jean M Connors
{"title":"Impact of as Needed Heparin Boluses on Supratherapeutic Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time in Patients Managed With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.","authors":"Delaney M Corcoran, Mary P Kovacevic, Heather Dell'Orfano, Katelyn W Sylvester, Jean M Connors","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Brigham and Women's Hospital historically used titratable weight-based heparin nomograms with as needed boluses managed by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation specialists to achieve a predetermined goal-activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Due to concern amongst providers that as needed boluses may lead to supratherapeutic aPTT's and subsequent bleeding, new nomograms without as needed boluses were implemented. The purpose of this retrospective observational analysis is to provide a comparison in safety and efficacy between the heparin nomograms with as needed boluses and the new nomograms without boluses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients who were cannulated on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and initiated on an approved heparin bolus nomogram (January 1, 2018-December 31, 2019) or an approved heparin no-bolus nomogram (October 20, 2020-March 31, 2021) were screened for inclusion. The major endpoint evaluated was the percentage of supratherapeutic aPTTs, defined as an aPTT above the upper limit of the specified nomogram goal, within the first 72 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 patients were included in the bolus nomogram cohort and 9 patients in the no-bolus nomogram cohort. Within the first 72 hours of initiation, there were 11.5% supratherapeutic aPTTs in the bolus group and 5.1% in the no-bolus group ( P = 0.101). Overall there was 1 bleeding event in the no-bolus group (11.1%) and 7 in the bolus group (30.4%) ( P = 0.26). There were no thromboembolic events in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, there was no difference found in the percentage of supratherapeutic aPTTs within the first 72 hours of heparin initiation between the bolus and no-bolus nomograms.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Brigham and Women's Hospital historically used titratable weight-based heparin nomograms with as needed boluses managed by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation specialists to achieve a predetermined goal-activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Due to concern amongst providers that as needed boluses may lead to supratherapeutic aPTT's and subsequent bleeding, new nomograms without as needed boluses were implemented. The purpose of this retrospective observational analysis is to provide a comparison in safety and efficacy between the heparin nomograms with as needed boluses and the new nomograms without boluses.

Methods: Adult patients who were cannulated on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and initiated on an approved heparin bolus nomogram (January 1, 2018-December 31, 2019) or an approved heparin no-bolus nomogram (October 20, 2020-March 31, 2021) were screened for inclusion. The major endpoint evaluated was the percentage of supratherapeutic aPTTs, defined as an aPTT above the upper limit of the specified nomogram goal, within the first 72 hours.

Results: A total of 23 patients were included in the bolus nomogram cohort and 9 patients in the no-bolus nomogram cohort. Within the first 72 hours of initiation, there were 11.5% supratherapeutic aPTTs in the bolus group and 5.1% in the no-bolus group ( P = 0.101). Overall there was 1 bleeding event in the no-bolus group (11.1%) and 7 in the bolus group (30.4%) ( P = 0.26). There were no thromboembolic events in either group.

Conclusions: Overall, there was no difference found in the percentage of supratherapeutic aPTTs within the first 72 hours of heparin initiation between the bolus and no-bolus nomograms.

按需注射肝素对体外膜氧合患者超治疗量活化部分凝血活酶时间的影响。
导言:布里格姆妇女医院(BWH)历来使用基于体重的可滴定肝素提名图,由体外膜氧合(ECMO)专家按需给药,以达到预定的活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)目标。由于医疗服务提供者担心按需给药可能会导致治疗性 aPTT 超标和随后的出血,因此实施了不按需给药的新提名图。本回顾性观察分析的目的是比较有按需给药的肝素提名图和无按需给药的新提名图的安全性和有效性:筛选了在 ECMO 上插管并开始使用已批准的肝素栓剂提名图(2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日)或已批准的肝素无栓剂提名图(2020 年 10 月 20 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日)的成人患者。评估的主要终点是在最初 72 小时内超治疗 aPTT 的百分比,超治疗 aPTT 的定义是 aPTT 高于指定提名图目标的上限:共有 23 名患者被纳入栓剂提名图队列,9 名患者被纳入无栓剂提名图队列。在开始治疗后的 72 小时内,栓剂组有 11.5% 的 aPTT 超治疗量,无栓剂组为 5.1%(P=0.101)。总的来说,无栓剂组有一次出血事件(11.1%),栓剂组有七次出血事件(30.4%)(P=0.26)。两组均未发生血栓栓塞事件:总体而言,栓剂和无栓剂提名图在肝素启动后 72 小时内的超治疗 aPTT 百分比方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信