Cost Effectiveness of Endovascular Ultrasound Renal Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
PharmacoEconomics Open Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s41669-024-00472-z
Rod S Taylor, Anthony Bentley, Kaylie Metcalfe, Melvin D Lobo, Ajay J Kirtane, Michel Azizi, Christopher Clark, Kieran Murphy, Jennifer H Boer, Marjolijn van Keep, An Thu Ta, Neil C Barman, Garrett Schwab, Ron Akehurst, Roland E Schmieder
{"title":"Cost Effectiveness of Endovascular Ultrasound Renal Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.","authors":"Rod S Taylor, Anthony Bentley, Kaylie Metcalfe, Melvin D Lobo, Ajay J Kirtane, Michel Azizi, Christopher Clark, Kieran Murphy, Jennifer H Boer, Marjolijn van Keep, An Thu Ta, Neil C Barman, Garrett Schwab, Ron Akehurst, Roland E Schmieder","doi":"10.1007/s41669-024-00472-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resistant hypertension (rHTN) is defined as blood pressure (BP) of ≥ 140/90 mmHg despite treatment with at least three antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic. Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) aims to control BP alongside conventional BP treatment with antihypertensive medication. This analysis assesses the cost effectiveness of the addition of the Paradise uRDN System compared with standard of care alone in patients with rHTN from the perspective of the United Kingdom (UK) health care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using RADIANCE-HTN TRIO trial data, we developed a state-transition model. Baseline risk was calculated using Framingham and Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) risk equations to estimate the long-term cardiovascular risks in patients treated with the Paradise uRDN System, based on the observed systolic BP (SBP) reduction following uRDN. Relative risks sourced from a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials were then used to project cardiovascular events in patients with baseline SBP ('control' patients); utility and mortality inputs and costs were derived from UK data. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Modelled outcomes were validated against trial meta-analyses and the QRISK3 algorithm and real-world evidence of RDN effectiveness. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty surrounding the model inputs and sensitivity of the model results to changes in parameter inputs. Results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mean reduction in office SBP of 8.5 mmHg with uRDN resulted in an average improvement in both absolute life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained compared with standard of care alone (0.73 LYs and 0.67 QALYs). The overall base-case ICER with uRDN was estimated at £5600 (€6500) per QALY gained (95% confidence interval £5463-£5739 [€6341-€6661]); modelling demonstrated > 99% probability that the ICER is below the £20,000-£30,000 (€23,214-€34,821) per QALYs gained willingness-to-pay threshold in the UK. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses and validation checks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endovascular ultrasound RDN with the Paradise system offers patients with rHTN, clinicians, and healthcare systems a cost-effective treatment option alongside antihypertensive medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11252101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-024-00472-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Resistant hypertension (rHTN) is defined as blood pressure (BP) of ≥ 140/90 mmHg despite treatment with at least three antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic. Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) aims to control BP alongside conventional BP treatment with antihypertensive medication. This analysis assesses the cost effectiveness of the addition of the Paradise uRDN System compared with standard of care alone in patients with rHTN from the perspective of the United Kingdom (UK) health care system.

Methods: Using RADIANCE-HTN TRIO trial data, we developed a state-transition model. Baseline risk was calculated using Framingham and Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) risk equations to estimate the long-term cardiovascular risks in patients treated with the Paradise uRDN System, based on the observed systolic BP (SBP) reduction following uRDN. Relative risks sourced from a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials were then used to project cardiovascular events in patients with baseline SBP ('control' patients); utility and mortality inputs and costs were derived from UK data. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Modelled outcomes were validated against trial meta-analyses and the QRISK3 algorithm and real-world evidence of RDN effectiveness. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty surrounding the model inputs and sensitivity of the model results to changes in parameter inputs. Results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

Results: A mean reduction in office SBP of 8.5 mmHg with uRDN resulted in an average improvement in both absolute life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained compared with standard of care alone (0.73 LYs and 0.67 QALYs). The overall base-case ICER with uRDN was estimated at £5600 (€6500) per QALY gained (95% confidence interval £5463-£5739 [€6341-€6661]); modelling demonstrated > 99% probability that the ICER is below the £20,000-£30,000 (€23,214-€34,821) per QALYs gained willingness-to-pay threshold in the UK. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses and validation checks.

Conclusions: Endovascular ultrasound RDN with the Paradise system offers patients with rHTN, clinicians, and healthcare systems a cost-effective treatment option alongside antihypertensive medication.

血管内超声肾脏去神经治疗顽固性高血压患者的成本效益。
背景:顽固性高血压(rHTN)的定义是,在使用包括利尿剂在内的至少三种降压药物治疗后,血压(BP)仍≥ 140/90 mmHg。血管内超声肾脏去神经(uRDN)的目的是在使用降压药物进行常规降压治疗的同时控制血压。本分析报告从英国医疗保健系统的角度,评估了在rHTN患者中增加Paradise uRDN系统与单纯标准治疗相比的成本效益:我们利用 RADIANCE-HTN TRIO 试验数据开发了一个状态转换模型。根据uRDN治疗后观察到的收缩压(SBP)降低情况,使用弗雷明汉和前瞻性心血管明斯特(PROCAM)风险方程计算基线风险,以估计接受天堂uRDN系统治疗的患者的长期心血管风险。然后使用随机对照试验荟萃分析得出的相对风险预测基线收缩压(SBP)患者("对照 "患者)的心血管事件;效用和死亡率输入及成本来自英国数据。成本和结果以每年 3.5% 的速度贴现。根据试验荟萃分析、QRISK3 算法和 RDN 效果的实际证据对模型结果进行了验证。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析,以评估模型输入的不确定性以及模型结果对参数输入变化的敏感性。结果以增量成本效益比(ICER)的形式报告:结果:与单纯标准治疗相比,uRDN 可使诊室 SBP 平均降低 8.5 mmHg,从而平均提高绝对生命年(LYs)和质量调整生命年(QALYs)(0.73 LYs 和 0.67 QALYs)。使用uRDN的总体基础案例ICER估计为每QALY获得5600英镑(6500欧元)(95%置信区间为5463-5739英镑[6341-6661欧元]);建模显示,在英国,ICER低于每QALYs获得20000-30000英镑(23214-34821欧元)的支付意愿阈值的可能性大于99%。敏感性分析和验证检查的结果一致:结论:使用 Paradise 系统的血管内超声 RDN 为 rHTN 患者、临床医生和医疗保健系统提供了一种与降压药物治疗并行的经济有效的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信