The mortality of patients with sepsis increases in the first month of a new academic year.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.15441/ceem.23.117
Sukyo Lee, Sungjin Kim, Sejoong Ahn, Hanjin Cho, Sungwoo Moon, Young Duck Cho, Jong-Hak Park
{"title":"The mortality of patients with sepsis increases in the first month of a new academic year.","authors":"Sukyo Lee, Sungjin Kim, Sejoong Ahn, Hanjin Cho, Sungwoo Moon, Young Duck Cho, Jong-Hak Park","doi":"10.15441/ceem.23.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many studies have examined the July effect. However, little is known about the July effect in sepsis. We hypothesized that the July effect would result in worse outcomes for patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients with sepsis, collected prospectively between January 2018 and December 2021, were analyzed. In Korea, the new academic year starts on March 1, so the \"July effect\" appears in March. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle. Outcomes in March were compared to other months. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to adjust for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 843 patients. There were no significant differences in sepsis severity. The 30-day mortality in March was higher (49.0% vs. 28.5%, P<0.001). However, there was no difference in bundle adherence in March (42.2% vs. 48.0%, P=0.264). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression showed that the July effect was associated with 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.925; 95% confidence interval, 1.405-2.638; P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The July effect was associated with 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis. However, bundle adherence did not differ. These.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>suggest that the increase in mortality during the turnover period might be related to unmeasured in-hospital management. Intensive supervision and education of residents caring for patients with sepsis is needed in the beginning of training.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"161-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Many studies have examined the July effect. However, little is known about the July effect in sepsis. We hypothesized that the July effect would result in worse outcomes for patients with sepsis.

Methods: Data from patients with sepsis, collected prospectively between January 2018 and December 2021, were analyzed. In Korea, the new academic year starts on March 1, so the "July effect" appears in March. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle. Outcomes in March were compared to other months. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to adjust for confounders.

Results: We included 843 patients. There were no significant differences in sepsis severity. The 30-day mortality in March was higher (49.0% vs. 28.5%, P<0.001). However, there was no difference in bundle adherence in March (42.2% vs. 48.0%, P=0.264). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression showed that the July effect was associated with 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.925; 95% confidence interval, 1.405-2.638; P<0.001).

Conclusion: The July effect was associated with 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis. However, bundle adherence did not differ. These.

Results: suggest that the increase in mortality during the turnover period might be related to unmeasured in-hospital management. Intensive supervision and education of residents caring for patients with sepsis is needed in the beginning of training.

败血症患者的死亡率在新学年的第一个月有所上升。
研究目的许多研究都探讨了七月效应。然而,人们对败血症中的七月效应知之甚少。我们假设,七月效应将导致败血症患者的预后更差:方法:采用 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间前瞻性收集的败血症患者。在韩国,新学年从 3 月 1 日开始,因此 "七月效应 "出现在 3 月份。主要结果是 30 天死亡率。次要结果包括对 "脓毒症生存运动 "捆绑包的依从性。对三月份和其他月份的结果进行了比较。对混杂因素进行了多变量考克斯比例危害回归调整:结果:共纳入 843 名患者。脓毒症严重程度无明显差异。三月份的 30 天死亡率较高(49% 对 28.5%;P < 0.001)。然而,三月份的捆绑治疗依从性没有差异(42.2% 对 48.0%;P = 0.264)。多变量考克斯比例危险回归显示,七月效应与脓毒症患者的死亡率有关[调整后危险比为1.925;95%置信区间为1.405-2.638;P < 0.001]:七月效应与脓毒症患者的 30 天死亡率有关。结论:"七月效应 "与脓毒症患者的 30 天死亡率有关,但捆绑治疗的依从性并无差异。这些结果表明,周转期死亡率的增加可能与未测量的院内管理有关。需要在培训初期对住院医师进行脓毒症患者护理方面的强化监督和教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信